mypetrobot Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 Bills at #5, take a gander: http://www.reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/klo6y/unbiased_mathematically_calculated_week_2_rankings/ The formula used is posted there as well.
Mikie2times Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 Bills at #5, take a gander: http://www.reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/klo6y/unbiased_mathematically_calculated_week_2_rankings/ The formula used is posted there as well. http://www.footballoutsiders.com/dvoa-ratings/2011/week-2-dvoa-ratings By far the most accurate on the internet. 6th overall, adjusted to 13th using other historical data and certain preseason statistics. I would say both are accurate. We played as the 6th best team considering performance and schedule combined, but long term a 13th ranking seems accurate. I hope we can flirt with 10 or below.
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 High on substance, low on platitude-laden analysis. Also, finally some respect for the Bills. My link
BuckeyeBill Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 3 of the top six are in the AFC East. WOW!
benderbender Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 It would complete the best weekend ever if we can snap the streak against the Bellicheaters
Picnic Table F'er Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 I like this. It's good list. Props to whoever puts it together.
CSBill Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 Fun, appears to be based totally on point differential
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 #5 ? that's laughable. Not until the defeat the Pat.riots should they be that high. It is only week 2. Be happy with 10 through 14.
mypetrobot Posted September 21, 2011 Author Posted September 21, 2011 #5 ? that's laughable. Not until the defeat the Pat.riots should they be that high. It is only week 2. Be happy with 10 through 14. Based on statistics and the formula used by the original poster, 5 is accurate. I guess there are pretty wild swings in the rankings until week 4-5 though.
EastRochBillsfan Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 Have you ok'd this post with Astrobot?? lol
MattM Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 From a very quick glance, the thing it seems to be missing is a component going to who your opponent was and how good/tough they are, which to me is an important component....
mypetrobot Posted September 21, 2011 Author Posted September 21, 2011 From a very quick glance, the thing it seems to be missing is a component going to who your opponent was and how good/tough they are, which to me is an important component.... I know the kid who is putting this list together is still working the kinks out of his/her formula, but it looks like he/she is at least attempting to account for strength of opponent with this part of the formula: Total points is calculated by ((winning % * 1.5) + (pt diff / 50) + (off stat) - (def stat) + (rush stat) + (pass stat) + (spec stat)) + (avg of all previous opponents totals / 2)
justnzane Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 Have you ok'd this post with Astrobot?? lol astro is the draft droid... if anyone in board history would have power of veto it would be mile high as he used to keep track of power rankings in his signature.
ACor58 Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 Not to call the Pats overrated, because they certainley are not, but did you see that their two wins came against two of the lowest rated teams (MIA and SD) with Def ranks of 32 and 30. Could explain the video game type numbers that Brady has been putting up.
MattM Posted September 21, 2011 Posted September 21, 2011 I know the kid who is putting this list together is still working the kinks out of his/her formula, but it looks like he/she is at least attempting to account for strength of opponent with this part of the formula: Total points is calculated by ((winning % * 1.5) + (pt diff / 50) + (off stat) - (def stat) + (rush stat) + (pass stat) + (spec stat)) + (avg of all previous opponents totals / 2) Thanks, didn't see that originally....
mypetrobot Posted September 27, 2011 Author Posted September 27, 2011 For those curious, here's week 3: We're #1, woo. Sorry for the double post, but we're also mathematically #1 on Football Outsiders as well: http://www.footballoutsiders.com/dvoa-ratings/2011/week-3-dvoa-ratings
Dorkington Posted September 27, 2011 Posted September 27, 2011 For those curious, here's week 3: We're #1, woo. Sorry for the double post, but we're also mathematically #1 on Football Outsiders as well: http://www.footballoutsiders.com/dvoa-ratings/2011/week-3-dvoa-ratings I like statistical based rankings.
Buffalo Beeeews Posted September 27, 2011 Posted September 27, 2011 Power Rankings are more useless than Tom Donahoe's GM skills...
Recommended Posts