OCinBuffalo Posted September 19, 2011 Posted September 19, 2011 (edited) No kidding. As of right now, we lead in YPG and YPC. In every way that matters, we are the #1 rushing team in the league. This was done against supposedly superior run defenses mind you. The only way we don't end up with this after tomorrow night is if the Rams run for 240+ yards. Who knows...but for today, we are #1. So, can anyone explain to me, especially those who have been carping about Ralph being cheap, us not getting Altanta's right tackle...who was mediocre tonight, Buddy Nix being asleep at the wheel....how a terrible front office, with a terrible coach, puts together a terrible O line....that leads the league in rushing? I know, I know, it's only week 2. However, if I had told any of you that we would be the #1 rushing team in the league....at ANY point in the season...during the preseason, you'd still be calling me names. Time for some accountability, or, time for some excuses, or, time for some pretty darn good explanations. Carry on. Edited September 19, 2011 by OCinBuffalo
JPicc2114 Posted September 19, 2011 Posted September 19, 2011 Teams still run the ball?? It doesn't seem like it. Looks like everyone is throwing every play to me.
John Cocktosten Posted September 19, 2011 Posted September 19, 2011 I'm hopeful but seriously, it's week 2. Carry on though.
Stenbar Posted September 19, 2011 Posted September 19, 2011 We will find out if they are for real this week....
OCinBuffalo Posted September 19, 2011 Author Posted September 19, 2011 (edited) I'm hopeful but seriously, it's week 2. Carry on though. We will find out if they are for real this week.... Non-answer 1. Non-answer 2. What is the point of posting non-answers? Give specific reasons/ make excuses for why you were wrong/ be accountable for being wrong....or GTFO of my thread. Fantastic. After today. Obama is not any part of the reason I do not visit PPP, other than how people act toward him. I know. Just saying hi to a respected PPP veteran...and Hollywood writer....in a PPP way. Edited September 19, 2011 by OCinBuffalo
djsabres Posted September 19, 2011 Posted September 19, 2011 (edited) We also lead in Points scored and TD's Edited September 19, 2011 by djsabres
Hapless Bills Fan Posted September 19, 2011 Posted September 19, 2011 (edited) No kidding. As of right now, we lead in YPG and YPC Actually after MNF we're now 3rd in YPC. But still 1st in YPG and also in PPG, rushing. We are very high up in passing PPG, too - in fact, 1st. But middle of the pack for YPA and YPG passing. Points being what win games, I'll take it! (Hey, don't you need a new avatar - a crow with a little Raider shield on it or something?) Edited September 19, 2011 by Hopeful
OCinBuffalo Posted September 19, 2011 Author Posted September 19, 2011 (edited) Actually after MNF we're now 3rd in YPC. But still 1st in YPG and also in PPG, rushing. We are very high up in passing PPG, too - in fact, 1st. But middle of the pack for YPA and YPG passing. Points being what win games, I'll take it! The only teams that were close/ahead were the Eagles and Rams. The Eagles came close...but not quite on YPG. Unless I screwed up the YPC somehow...which is entirely possible...who is ahead? EDIT Eagles First Game: 32 att 236 yards... Eagles 2nd Game 30 att 133 yards I get 5.95 so...they are better in YPC by .05 Edited September 19, 2011 by OCinBuffalo
ndirish1978 Posted September 19, 2011 Posted September 19, 2011 We also lead in Points scored and TD's +1, beat me to it!
Captain Caveman Posted September 19, 2011 Posted September 19, 2011 Because no other team has been able to play both the Raiders and the Chiefs? And Fred Jackson.
John from Riverside Posted September 19, 2011 Posted September 19, 2011 I think its a combonation of things (although i expected us to be much improved in the 2nd year of Chan's offense I didnt expect this) - A offensive line with veteran players that up till today was pretty much intact (hopefully Rhinehart can hold it down because Urbik was playing pretty darn well.....I acutally think the two of them are interchangable) - An offense that is not designed to hold onto the ball....hense no Lee Evans..... - A QB who reads and reacts quickly.....does not hold onto the ball - Finally having a TE that can both be a weapon AND block - A extremely underrated main back and a change of pace speed back who is improving by the game Stir it all up and you have this output....which was actually pretty impressive against a Raiders defensive line
OCinBuffalo Posted September 19, 2011 Author Posted September 19, 2011 Because no other team has been able to play both the Raiders and the Chiefs? And Fred Jackson. You can't be marked down for both an excuse AND an explanation. Pick one. Fred Jackson is either good because he is Fred Jackson, or, he is "good" because the Raiders/Chiefs suck.
#34fan Posted September 19, 2011 Posted September 19, 2011 Fred Jackson. Period. He's the unsung hero of the day. Guy made some absolutely beautiful plays out there today. We lose that game without Fred.
NewEra Posted September 19, 2011 Posted September 19, 2011 "Fred Jackson is an average RB"....who on this board said it? Not me.
Captain Caveman Posted September 19, 2011 Posted September 19, 2011 (edited) You can't be marked down for both an excuse AND an explanation. Pick one. Fred Jackson is either good because he is Fred Jackson, or, he is "good" because the Raiders/Chiefs suck. Without Fred Jackson, we would not be leading the league in rushing. If we hadn't opened up against KC and Oakland, we would not be #1 in rushing. I stand by my answer. The O-line has looked adequate; these two wins have been entirely because of our skill players (on offense at least.) Fitz had very little time to throw yesterday, he was getting rid of the ball extremely quickly. Jackson made the most out of some small gaps. BTW, I'm not one who was bashing the O-line before the season, I was (and still am) hoping that experience brings them more confidence and success. But don't expect to still be leading the league in rushing at the end of the season. We will find out if they are for real this week.... Maybe. The Pats defense hasn't been stellar. Edited September 19, 2011 by Captain Caveman
UConn James Posted September 19, 2011 Posted September 19, 2011 Time for some accountability, or, time for some excuses, or, time for some pretty darn good explanations. Seriously, I think it's my avatar and caption that's doing it.
8-8 Forever? Posted September 19, 2011 Posted September 19, 2011 Without Fred Jackson, we would not be leading the league in rushing. If we hadn't opened up against KC and Oakland, we would not be #1 in rushing. I stand by my answer. The O-line has looked adequate; these two wins have been entirely because of our skill players (on offense at least.) Fitz had very little time to throw yesterday, he was getting rid of the ball extremely quickly. Jackson made the most out of some small gaps. BTW, I'm not one who was bashing the O-line before the season, I was (and still am) hoping that experience brings them more confidence and success. But don't expect to still be leading the league in rushing at the end of the season. Maybe. The Pats defense hasn't been stellar. Pats will put a ton of points up on this defense. If Jason Campbell can do what he did, Brady will have a field day. Lots of points on the board this week, it would seem.
eball Posted September 19, 2011 Posted September 19, 2011 I'm pretty certain that the existence of Lee Evans is drawing coverage away from our rushing attack, leading to...umm...never mind.
Recommended Posts