thurman34 Posted September 5, 2011 Posted September 5, 2011 Pats drafted 26 players between 2006 and 2008...only 3 remain on active roster. Ouch (although it hasn't appeared to hurt them too much)
PromoTheRobot Posted September 5, 2011 Posted September 5, 2011 When did Paoli leave? I believe Belichick became the de facto GM when he left. PTR
boyst Posted September 5, 2011 Posted September 5, 2011 The Patriots draft has never been that strong but the way they utilize players is what matters. They are not that great with the draft and save for about 3 or 4 free agents they would not be the same team. Their drafting of the two TE's was a big score, though. When did Paoli leave? I believe Belichick became the de facto GM when he left. PTR 08. He also worked with BB in Cleveland.
Captain Hindsight Posted September 5, 2011 Posted September 5, 2011 Their best players the last few years (minus brady) are Welker, woodhead, Moss, and now they have added Ochocinco and Haynesworth. Their drafting has been bad which is why they wheel and deal so often. Getting Ochocinco and Haynsworth, some say savvy, I say Desperation
SwampD Posted September 5, 2011 Posted September 5, 2011 I already felt better about the Bills after this thread. But now I feel even better about them. ...oh, those silly Patriots*.
NoSaint Posted September 5, 2011 Posted September 5, 2011 Pats drafted 26 players between 2006 and 2008...only 3 remain on active roster. Ouch (although it hasn't appeared to hurt them too much) It's pretty evident that's why they are taking shots with big al, ocho, etc.... The playmakers from those years are missing from the roster.
RJ (not THAT RJ) Posted September 5, 2011 Posted September 5, 2011 All of this of course does not mean that the Pats* are not still a good team. But it should help us all to see just how uncertain the draft can be for all teams. And, alongside the story of the Colts and their fears of life without Peyton, it shows how hard it is for really good teams to stay on top as their superstar players age. Of course, as Bills fans, we should know that already.
GRHater69 Posted September 6, 2011 Posted September 6, 2011 Don't overlook the fact that the Patsies have finished at the top, or near the top of the standings. That means a lot of lower slotting for the draft. That being said, I agree with RJ, the draft is an inexact science that breeds more misses than hits.
NoSaint Posted September 6, 2011 Posted September 6, 2011 Don't overlook the fact that the Patsies have finished at the top, or near the top of the standings. That means a lot of lower slotting for the draft. That being said, I agree with RJ, the draft is an inexact science that breeds more misses than hits. It also means there's less holes to fill so those guys had less of a chance
blogic2 Posted September 6, 2011 Posted September 6, 2011 If you are only counting those on the Patriots roster, you are using the wrong analysis. The better analysis be how many of those players are still active in the NFL. When you have an established, successful team, rookies have a tough time getting on the field. They may have found NFL homes elsewhere.
CardinalScotts Posted September 6, 2011 Posted September 6, 2011 Pats drafted 26 players between 2006 and 2008...only 3 remain on active roster. Ouch (although it hasn't appeared to hurt them too much) I know -it is sick- but the free agent pickups usually seem to work out for them. I shouldn't be a recipe for success and they haven't won a super bowl 7-8 years but still make the playoffs.
billsfan89 Posted September 6, 2011 Posted September 6, 2011 09 draft wasn't spectacular aside from Vollmer they didn't add much (Although if Chung plays consistently they might have something there). The 10 draft was really good however.
Buffalo Barbarian Posted September 6, 2011 Posted September 6, 2011 Pats drafted 26 players between 2006 and 2008...only 3 remain on active roster. Ouch (although it hasn't appeared to hurt them too much) just win Baby. They get so many veterans at the tail end of their careers it makes up for all the busts. You would think with all the draft picks that they get every year they would have more guys but maybe they feel like they are throw away picks that if they pan out great but if not they can get the FAs they need to keep winning.
Sisyphean Bills Posted September 6, 2011 Posted September 6, 2011 [This is an automated response] This subject matter is being currently being discussed or has already been discussed in a previous thread. Please consider using the "search" function before starting new topics. Thank you.
Recommended Posts