papazoid Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 (edited) i isolated and watched every move/play when he was on the field. he gets absolutely no push.....he's not gonna make it in this league....heck, Kellen Heard played better than Troup.....troup did make two nice plays later in the game against the third stringers, but when he was in early against the starters, he did nothing. i don't care what he did in the off season, he looks weak. the only positive thing i saw, was a technique issue change from last year, where he has stopped the bending of his left knee, which put all of his weight on his right side. he now attempts leverage in a balanced stance, but he still gets zero push. Edited November 30, 2011 by papazoid
Doc Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 Wait until he gets the cast off. Reportedly it should come off before the opener.
vincec Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 I wouldn't say that he's "horrible" but he definitely is not starting material right now.
vincec Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 Buddy's first draft is looking like a bust. I wouldn't say a bust, but it doesn't look like there are any home runs. Carrington, Moats, Easley, Batten and Troup all look like possible starters/backups. Carrington, Easley or Batten may even be starting by year's end. That's not bad for their second year. I also think that Moats is being misused.
artmalibu Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 Ok so he got no push, but did he get pushed? Was he double teamed? Are the lions O line better than average? Did the other DTs get a lot of push? I didnt get to see the game tonight due to blackout. errr
truth on hold Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 Buddy's first draft is looking like a bust. Carrying on bills tradition of early round busts/disappointments but finding value in later rounds
bbb Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 Carrying on bills tradition of early round busts/disappointments but finding value in later rounds That's what I was just going to reply to Vince with. You need to hit an early round home run more than once in ten years (so you can trade him for a 4th rounder of course)
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 Carrying on bills tradition of early round busts/disappointments but finding value in later rounds It's more of a crap shoot in the later rounds, IMO. So, I would attribute early round failure to ineptitude and late round success to dumb luck...
Doc Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 That's what I was just going to reply to Vince with. You need to hit an early round home run more than once in ten years (so you can trade him for a 4th rounder of course) Like Dareus?
truth on hold Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 Fingers crossed be breaks a time honored tradition.
buffalohotwings Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 From what I saw I thought he looked pretty good tonight....the announcers even said he was holding his ground against double teams...and he made a nice play in the backfield as well. I don't think you guys are giving him enough credit!
Saint Doug Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 (edited) Carrying on bills tradition of early round busts/disappointments but finding value in later rounds The only reason we find "starters" in the later rounds is because our players really aren't that good. Truth is, these "starters" usually wouldn't be starting on most other teams. These "great finds" become starters more out of necessity. Someone has to start and they can't all be free agents. That said, the other strange thing is that usually NFL teams usually have a greater likelihood of finding quality players in the earlier rounds. As the rounds increase, this probability usually diminishes. Not so with the Bills. If the probability of finding a starter, regardless of the round, remains equal, then it appears these selections are just random guesses, rather than educated/researched guesses. It's more of a crap shoot in the later rounds, IMO. So, I would attribute early round failure to ineptitude and late round success to dumb luck... Bulls eye. Edited September 2, 2011 by kas23
beerme1 Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 i isolated and watched every move/play when he was on the field. he gets absolutely no push.....he's not gonna make it in this league....heck, Kellen Heard played better than Troup.....troup did make two nice plays later in the game against the third stringers, but when he was in early against the starters, he did nothing. i don't care what he did in the off season, he looks weak. the only positive thing i saw, was a technique issue change from last year, where he has stopped the bending of his left knee, which put all of his weight on his right side. he now attempts leverage in a balanced stance, but he still gets zero push. I'm sorry I will be the first in this thread to disagree. Troup had at least one awesome drive where he was responsible for a sack on one play, a loss on another and containment on a third down that resulted in a three and out if i'm not mistaken, So ya whatever. I guess the guy blows or my own lying eyes at the game are really bad. Oh by the way, I also noticed that the white cast was off but he had a bulky black cast still on for this game. I;m sorry I will withold judgement on him until after this season. I do not think he is a bust and I think he will be a solid player.
BillsVet Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 2010 draft class going into their second season features 0 starters. Can't call it a complete waste, but Spiller is a role player, Troup struggles, Carrington is being used as a super hybrid LB in sub-packages, Easley will get the nod because they have nothing but bodies at WR, and Batten and Moats are depth at this point. For a still rebuilding team, I'd expect them to have some of their 2nd year players starting. Well, Buddy has a much higher rate of success drafting in the top 5.
bowery4 Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 2010 draft class going into their second season features 0 starters. Can't call it a complete waste, but Spiller is a role player, Troup struggles, Carrington is being used as a super hybrid LB in sub-packages, Easley will get the nod because they have nothing but bodies at WR, and Batten and Moats are depth at this point. For a still rebuilding team, I'd expect them to have some of their 2nd year players starting. Well, Buddy has a much higher rate of success drafting in the top 5. "Dude I know we haven't had anything to cheer about in a decade, but I think you're being a little negative." who ever said that was spot on with you.
shoretalk Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 I didn't see the game but when reading the first media reports of who played well for the Bills in the game guess whose name was there? Troup's! Now, unlike many who post here I do not keep track of each person's opinions but there have been a few Troup detractors from Day One and perhaps that has been your chosen role. In this thread there is a report from someone who also watched the game and reflects that Troup held his own against double teams and that he did a good job filling up the middle of the line. NT's are not statistic creators but a key role is to take on more than one lineman so that at least one of their teammates is unblocked. Troup came into camp in super shape before suffering his hand injury. I am going to rely on all of the media reports rather than a headliner here who chooses to say that Troup is horrible. Of course we will all know what the coaches have to say in 48 hours.
Doc Posted September 2, 2011 Posted September 2, 2011 I didn't see the game but when reading the first media reports of who played well for the Bills in the game guess whose name was there? Troup's! Now, unlike many who post here I do not keep track of each person's opinions but there have been a few Troup detractors from Day One and perhaps that has been your chosen role. In this thread there is a report from someone who also watched the game and reflects that Troup held his own against double teams and that he did a good job filling up the middle of the line. NT's are not statistic creators but a key role is to take on more than one lineman so that at least one of their teammates is unblocked. Troup came into camp in super shape before suffering his hand injury. I am going to rely on all of the media reports rather than a headliner here who chooses to say that Troup is horrible. Of course we will all know what the coaches have to say in 48 hours. You have to take people's "expert opinions" here with a grain of salt. The true test is how they perform during the season.
Recommended Posts