Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Does anyone know if Tim Graham left the AFC East blog with ESPN.com? I haven't seen his name in a while and was curious whether or not someone else is taking over that? Not like many blog posts have been written about the Bills recently, but if so I am curious to see who will take his place and remind us how badly we are lagging behind the Jets and Pats.

Posted
  On 8/10/2011 at 8:12 PM, SpecialK15 said:

Does anyone know if Tim Graham left the AFC East blog with ESPN.com? I haven't seen his name in a while and was curious whether or not someone else is taking over that? Not like many blog posts have been written about the Bills recently, but if so I am curious to see who will take his place and remind us how badly we are lagging behind the Jets and Pats.

 

http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/132164-wheres-tim-graham/

Posted
  On 8/10/2011 at 8:41 PM, gfalk87 said:

Tim's back working at the Buffalo News, but not in a sports role.

 

What's a "Buffalo News"? Is that one of those prehistoric methods of distributing information on a stone tablet or papyrus?

 

Seriously, when is that means of information going to die? In the 24-hour newscycle, what's more useless at 7 a.m. than news printed 6 hours ago that happened 12-24 hours ago. Read one tomorrow's Buffalo News' front page stories right now at cnn.com.

Posted
  On 8/10/2011 at 9:05 PM, zonabb said:

What's a "Buffalo News"? Is that one of those prehistoric methods of distributing information on a stone tablet or papyrus?

 

Seriously, when is that means of information going to die? In the 24-hour newscycle, what's more useless at 7 a.m. than news printed 6 hours ago that happened 12-24 hours ago. Read one tomorrow's Buffalo News' front page stories right now at cnn.com.

Thank you Rupert Murdoch...how's that wiretap business working out?

Posted
  On 8/10/2011 at 9:05 PM, zonabb said:

What's a "Buffalo News"? Is that one of those prehistoric methods of distributing information on a stone tablet or papyrus?

 

Seriously, when is that means of information going to die? In the 24-hour newscycle, what's more useless at 7 a.m. than news printed 6 hours ago that happened 12-24 hours ago. Read one tomorrow's Buffalo News' front page stories right now at cnn.com.

 

That assumes the 24-hour newscycle is necessary. But if you look at a lot of the "content", its kinda obvious we could all live fine with getting our news once or twice a day. Then, at least, it would be quality over quantity, instead of the current opposite situation.

 

I'd gladly give up the news channels and websites.

Posted
  On 8/10/2011 at 9:05 PM, zonabb said:

What's a "Buffalo News"? Is that one of those prehistoric methods of distributing information on a stone tablet or papyrus?

 

Seriously, when is that means of information going to die? In the 24-hour newscycle, what's more useless at 7 a.m. than news printed 6 hours ago that happened 12-24 hours ago. Read one tomorrow's Buffalo News' front page stories right now at cnn.com.

Wow! Do you work for WBEN?

Posted
  On 8/10/2011 at 9:05 PM, zonabb said:

What's a "Buffalo News"? Is that one of those prehistoric methods of distributing information on a stone tablet or papyrus?

 

Seriously, when is that means of information going to die? In the 24-hour newscycle, what's more useless at 7 a.m. than news printed 6 hours ago that happened 12-24 hours ago. Read one tomorrow's Buffalo News' front page stories right now at cnn.com.

 

A good amount of information given during the 24 hour news cycle is not even newsworthy. Just busy "noise." And it leads to a lot of erroneous information

or outright misinformation being "reported." So I'm all for multiple sources of news.

Posted

[This is an automated response]

 

This subject matter is being currently being discussed or has already been discussed in a previous thread.

 

Please consider using the "search" function before starting new topics.

 

Thank you.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...