Dave_In_Norfolk Posted August 11, 2011 Author Posted August 11, 2011 Let me guess, you idolize JFK? Rich boy who admitted he really didn't even really know the Depression was going on when he was growing up. Good President, though. Lincoln is worth idolizing Nah. Huey Long. Ya, like you love Steve Forbes
DC Tom Posted August 12, 2011 Posted August 12, 2011 Rich boy who admitted he really didn't even really know the Depression was going on when he was growing up. Good President, though. When he was growing up? What? I always like the Onion headline: FDR Introduces "Big Deal" Plan: "Big deal. I'm rich." Lincoln is worth idolizing
3rdnlng Posted August 12, 2011 Posted August 12, 2011 Rich boy who admitted he really didn't even really know the Depression was going on when he was growing up. Good President, though. Lincoln is worth idolizing Ya, like you love Steve Forbes Just so you know, I call myself a JFK conservative. That has to be so tough for you far out loony leftist ***** to comprehend. The icon of your party was to the right of George Bush. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted August 13, 2011 Author Posted August 13, 2011 Bachmann wins! And Mr. Anti-abortion, the social conservative Ron Paul gets second. Long live the moon bats!!
/dev/null Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0811/61315.html Big boost for the Bachmann candidacy. Ron Paul comes in a close second. Biggest loser IMO was Huntsman. 69 votes total Not that any of it matters. I never quite understood what the big deal with the Iowa Strawpoll was
Joe Miner Posted August 14, 2011 Posted August 14, 2011 Not that any of it matters. I never quite understood what the big deal with the Iowa Strawpoll was It gives the media something to talk about. Otherwise, it's as important to the country as the second half of the Bills/Bears game tonight.
Buftex Posted August 14, 2011 Posted August 14, 2011 http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0811/61315.html Big boost for the Bachmann candidacy. Ron Paul comes in a close second. Biggest loser IMO was Huntsman. 69 votes total Not that any of it matters. I never quite understood what the big deal with the Iowa Strawpoll was Bob Dole, Phil Graham, Mitt Romney and Pat Robertson are all calling to congratulate her!
/dev/null Posted August 14, 2011 Posted August 14, 2011 Bob Dole, Phil Graham, Mitt Romney and Pat Robertson are all calling to congratulate her! Dole, Graham, and Robertson haven't figured out how to use that new fangled telephony device yet, so they sent her a telegram. Romney is a used car salesman, so at least he's a little more up to date. Dude will whatever it takes to get you to drive off the lot in a late Model T
Bishop Hedd Posted August 14, 2011 Posted August 14, 2011 Bachmann's nomination to lose. All the negative media attention she will continue to receive will not stop her. The Republican etablishment is probably wondering what is going on?
Booster4324 Posted August 14, 2011 Posted August 14, 2011 Bachmann/ Palin or Palin/Bachmann 2012!!!!! So you want Obama to get a second term?
1billsfan Posted August 14, 2011 Posted August 14, 2011 Bachmann's nomination to lose. All the negative media attention she will continue to receive will not stop her. The Republican etablishment is probably wondering what is going on? Get real. After the Obama disaster, you won't see another person from congress get their party's nomination for at least fifty years. This is a real job, amateurs need not apply. We need a decision maker, not another talker.
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted August 14, 2011 Author Posted August 14, 2011 Get real. After the Obama disaster, you won't see another person from congress get their party's nomination for at least fifty years. This is a real job, amateurs need not apply. We need a decision maker, not another talker. Fifty years? You know fifty years in the future? And Senator Obama is a disaster for having to clean up Governor Bush's wrecking of the Federal government?
birdog1960 Posted August 14, 2011 Posted August 14, 2011 (edited) Bachmann/ Palin or Palin/Bachmann 2012!!!!! best possible scenario for liberals! anyone watching fox news sunday? it's like a republican pep rally...i mean, even more than usual we just saw unprecedented wall street volatility and continued panic and they spend an hour on bachmann and perry never mentioning the markets? Edited August 14, 2011 by birdog1960
Bishop Hedd Posted August 14, 2011 Posted August 14, 2011 there is no way the conservative base is going to rally around Romney. They tried that with McCain and are still upset about that. As for Perry all you have to say is Texas and governor and there goes that campaign. Michelle will have this wrapped up by next february. Her strange unflappability on Meet the Press this morning proves nothing phases her. I think that is what the base wants.
1billsfan Posted August 14, 2011 Posted August 14, 2011 (edited) Fifty years? You know fifty years in the future? And Senator Obama is a disaster for having to clean up Governor Bush's wrecking of the Federal government? The big liberal lie (that lost it's mojo a full year ago) is that the mess was Bush's fault. The 30 year liberal agenda of pushing mortgages on people who couldn't afford them and lack of basic oversight on wallstreet was the main cause of the mess. Bush was just the guy in charge when the bottom fell out. Obama took a mess and created an epic disaster. America lost theirs collective minds voting for such an rank amateur in Obama. Not only is he an amateur, he will surely go down as the laziest president we've ever had. He's either on the golf course, on vacation, at a ritzy celeb party or on the campaign trail. American's have finally clued into the fact that he simply doesn't like to work. With the exception of a few people, almost everyone who works in congress doesn't like to work, that's why they become congressmen. Those people are the laziest workers in America. When I heard that Obama voted "present" 128 times in the state senate I laughed and said that this guy can't even do the lazy man's job of simply voting!...LOL Edited August 14, 2011 by 1billsfan
/dev/null Posted August 14, 2011 Posted August 14, 2011 Meet the Depressed and Faux News Sunday both reporting that Paulenty is dropping out of the race
Gene Frenkle Posted August 14, 2011 Posted August 14, 2011 The big liberal lie (that lost it's mojo a full year ago) is that the mess was Bush's fault. The 30 year liberal agenda of pushing mortgages on people who couldn't afford them and lack of basic oversight on wallstreet was the main cause of the mess. Bush was just the guy in charge when the bottom fell out. Obama took a mess and created an epic disaster. America lost theirs collective minds voting for such an rank amateur in Obama. Not only is he an amateur, he will surely go down as the laziest president we've ever had. He's either on the golf course, on vacation, at a ritzy celeb party or on the campaign trail. American's have finally clued into the fact that he simply doesn't like to work. With the exception of a few people, almost everyone who works in congress doesn't like to work, that's why they become congressmen. Those people are the laziest workers in America. When I heard that Obama voted "present" 128 times in the state senate I laughed and said that this guy can't even do the lazy man's job of simply voting!...LOL You're going to go absolutely ballistic when he gets re-elected. You won't be able to comprehend how such a thing could happen. Welcome to my 2004.
finknottle Posted August 14, 2011 Posted August 14, 2011 http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0811/61315.html Big boost for the Bachmann candidacy. Ron Paul comes in a close second. Biggest loser IMO was Huntsman. 69 votes total Not that any of it matters. I never quite understood what the big deal with the Iowa Strawpoll was Don't think of it as an election, think of it as a job fair. If your strategy for the nomination involves Iowa, you need to fight for the Iowa activists. The straw poll weeds out weaker candidates, freeing up their operatives to sign on with the candidates they think can win.
Bishop Hedd Posted August 14, 2011 Posted August 14, 2011 I thought their was no way George W Bush was going to be re-elected in 2004. Never doubt the power of incumbancy especially with the weak and strange GOP field of candidates.
Recommended Posts