Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Another goodie from recent email leaks: (warning, slightly political in nature, apologies)

 

Alien-Invasion.jpg

 

"The FIRESIGN scenario is that of an invading extraterrestrial force of nearly incomprehensible scale (massive floating cities descending, god-sized “walkers” among the clouds with terrifying weapons, wheels of fire and eyes, etc.). This phenomena, when activated will bring electoral and social systems to a halt and, in afflicted areas, will permit a narrative wherein POTUS is able to “Call a halt” to the invasion and then “hand over the torch” to Clinton, providing a basic continuity of state.

 

"AFTERMATH The aftermath of FIRESIGN will be the psychological subjugation of areas where uprisings are most likely to occur. The induced trauma of FIRESIGN will provide ample cover to government and NGOs who will be “providing aid” (psychotropic to induce docility) and counseling services which will ensure further domestication. FIRESIGN will require a great deal of power, mobile command stations with nitrogencooled super-computers, and the co-opting of the ELF arrays. We have created a schedule and teams roster that can be moved into position following the third debate."

 

http://media.wix.com/ugd/0cf371_514bfe6a2dec4871ab7da7d50b9be410.pdf

 

:ph34r:

:ph34r:

Posted

Then again, there's always the possibility that some of these "crashes" weren't accidents but shoot-downs from our own defense systems -- which are undoubtedly more advanced than we're generally aware -- and that could explain a number of the more famous alleged crashes... :ph34r:

 

 

If you get that they're less likely to crash than the average high school aged driver, you'll probably agree they are unlikely to get taken down by any rocks we could throw at them. I can NOT imagine what our world could do in one hundred years, much less a million years. (Assuming we can survive that long..... Jodie Foster in the movie Contact - "How did you do it? How did you survive your technological adolescence?")

Posted

If you get that they're less likely to crash than the average high school aged driver, you'll probably agree they are unlikely to get taken down by any rocks we could throw at them. I can NOT imagine what our world could do in one hundred years, much less a million years. (Assuming we can survive that long..... Jodie Foster in the movie Contact - "How did you do it? How did you survive your technological adolescence?")

 

I'm of course speculating wildly (throughout the thread), but to add some more gasoline to the fire... You're right that it would be surprising that our civilization could have any sort of tech that would cause them issues, but it's certainly possible that we have more advanced capabilities than just flinging rocks.

 

This video from the space station remains one of the more crucial pieces of video evidence around imo, you'll see an object moving from left to right (at very high speeds), a faint FLASH from the surface below which "spooks" the object to rapidly change directions in such a way that violates pretty much every law of physics moments before a projectile is launched seemingly at the object. Almost like a missile defense system:

 

Posted

 

I'm of course speculating wildly (throughout the thread), but to add some more gasoline to the fire... You're right that it would be surprising that our civilization could have any sort of tech that would cause them issues, but it's certainly possible that we have more advanced capabilities than just flinging rocks.

 

This video from the space station remains one of the more crucial pieces of video evidence around imo, you'll see an object moving from left to right (at very high speeds), a faint FLASH from the surface below which "spooks" the object to rapidly change directions in such a way that violates pretty much every law of physics moments before a projectile is launched seemingly at the object. Almost like a missile defense system:

 

 

 

Gasoline to the fire? Don't you mean do-doo to the steaming pile?

Posted

Gasoline to the fire? Don't you mean do-doo to the steaming pile?

 

This is pretty compelling visual evidence, from NASA cameras aboard the ISS. It's footage freely available from multiple other outlets, proving that it hasn't been CG'd or altered (unless you want to argue NASA augmented it live -- which would be a different discussion) and has yet to be debunked despite many attempts to do so.

 

Dust and ice particles don't move/change directions like we see in the video. Neither do satellites or any known man-made objects. People ask me a lot what's the best video evidence of the phenomenon out there, I always point them to this.

Posted

 

This is pretty compelling visual evidence, from NASA cameras aboard the ISS. It's footage freely available from multiple other outlets, proving that it hasn't been CG'd or altered (unless you want to argue NASA augmented it live -- which would be a different discussion) and has yet to be debunked despite many attempts to do so.

 

Dust and ice particles don't move/change directions like we see in the video. Neither do satellites or any known man-made objects. People ask me a lot what's the best video evidence of the phenomenon out there, I always point them to this.

 

That's not from the ISS. That's old shuttle footage - I've seen it many, many times before.

Posted

 

And dust/ice particles do change direction like that.

 

You mean they dramatically change course (without slowing down) in response to a threat and accelerate out of orbit??

 

That's some magic spec of ice/dust. :beer:

 

Do we often launch projectiles from the surface of the planet to intercept dust/ice particles in LEO too?

 

:ph34r:

Posted

 

You mean they dramatically change course (without slowing down) in response to a threat and accelerate out of orbit??

 

That's some magic spec of ice/dust. :beer:

 

Do we often launch projectiles from the surface of the planet to intercept dust/ice particles in LEO too?

 

:ph34r:

 

They dramatically change course when they bounce off a piece of glass, in ways that have nothing to do with the completely unrelated streak of light.

 

There is absolutely no depth or perspective in that video to indicate anything, really. That the speck of light "maneuvers" in response to a "threat" is a ridiculous assertion when that speck could be inches away from the camera, and that streak hundreds of miles away, and there's absolutely no way to tell otherwise.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...