Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, LeGOATski said:

Oh look, @4merper4mer tries to have another conversation, but he sucks at it.

 

 

Oh look, you refuse to use research or critical thinking again.  Do you suck at it or just prefer to be spoon fed?

Edited by 4merper4mer
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
5 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

Oh look, you refuse to use these arch or critical thinking again.  Do you suck at it or just prefer to be spoon fed?

I just like watching you get all flustered in here

Posted
2 hours ago, LeGOATski said:

I just like watching you get all flustered in here

Ok here’s the spoon feeding one time.  Elliptical galaxies are comprised almost solely of hydrogen fusing into helium and not enough heavier elements for planets to form.

Posted
1 hour ago, 4merper4mer said:

Ok here’s the spoon feeding one time.  Elliptical galaxies are comprised almost solely of hydrogen fusing into helium and not enough heavier elements for planets to form.

That's so cool

Posted
17 hours ago, LeGOATski said:

That's so cool

It’s just facts.  What I find cooler is that almost every atom in the universe beyond hydrogen, including every atom on Earth, also including every one in you and me was at one point formed inside a star.

Posted
4 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

It’s just facts.  What I find cooler is that almost every atom in the universe beyond hydrogen, including every atom on Earth, also including every one in you and me was at one point formed inside a star.

We all come from the same place, but evolved into unbelievably different, unimaginable forms. That should tell you something.

Posted
31 minutes ago, LeGOATski said:

We all come from the same place, but evolved into unbelievably different, unimaginable forms. That should tell you something.

That’s a vague statement.  Math is precise.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
15 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

That’s a vague statement.  Math is precise.

 

Math based upon wild assumptions is less than precise. That is just a fact. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
16 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

That’s a vague statement.  Math is precise.

 

Not when the equation is based on unknown variables.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Augie said:

 

Math based upon wild assumptions is less than precise. That is just a fact. 

That would be correct if math were based on wild assumptions.  But it isn’t.

Posted
Just now, 4merper4mer said:

That would be correct if math were based on wild assumptions.  But it isn’t.

 

You are familiar with math, correct? You need to plug things into the formula. The things you want to plug in are nothing but wild a$$ guesses. We do not know these things. We CANNOT know these things. So it’s just a way for you to try to confirm your own personal biases. 

 

Period. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

You are familiar with math, correct? You need to plug things into the formula. The things you want to plug in are nothing but wild a$$ guesses. We do not know these things. We CANNOT know these things. So it’s just a way for you to try to confirm your own personal biases. 

 

Period. 

What things have I plugged into what formulas?

Posted
2 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

What things have I plugged into what formulas?

 

What did you put in your math? These are “mathy” things I speak of. Don’t claim math makes you right, then refuse to show your work. 

Posted
On 10/15/2023 at 6:36 PM, LeGOATski said:

Just spoon-feed yourself another YouTube video.

Sheldon and sticking your fingers in your ears singing lalala > YouTube, books, peer reviewed studies, observations of the cosmos, basic logic and math?

 

You've got me there.

 

image.jpeg.988b86e41fdc8ee0fb6c0c2311d6823e.jpeg

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
18 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

Sheldon and sticking your fingers in your ears singing lalala > YouTube, books, peer reviewed studies, observations of the cosmos, basic logic and math?

 

You've got me there.

 

image.jpeg.988b86e41fdc8ee0fb6c0c2311d6823e.jpeg

I did get you. And it was too easy.

 

Try not being a huge hypocrite and you might have a productive conversation.

Posted
4 hours ago, LeGOATski said:

I did get you. And it was too easy.

 

Try not being a huge hypocrite and you might have a productive conversation.

For starters on the productive conversation, how about you post one thought/opinion that uses physics, math or even just good reasoning on something that points to the existence or potential existence of communicative/intelligent alien species?

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
8 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

For starters on the productive conversation, how about you post one thought/opinion that uses physics, math or even just good reasoning on something that points to the existence or potential existence of communicative/intelligent alien species?

I love that you're desperate for me to talk to you about this stuff and you want my attention. I'm truly flattered. We're just in two different places right now and I can't give you the attention you deserve. It's not you, it's me.

  • Haha (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...