UFO Found on Ocean Floor?

[Bad Things]

https://thehill.com/video/4120312-watch-live-house-oversight-panel-convenes-hearing-on-ufos-national-security/

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/4118340-ufo-hearing-live-updates-lawmakers-former-officials-strange-sightings/

 

Quote

The House Oversight subcommittee on national security spent the morning hearing from witnesses who pushed for more transparency in how the government handles reports of unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP).

Both the witnesses and lawmakers accused the Pentagon of covering up information about its UAP program, and called for transparent and centralized reporting databases moving forward.

 

[Warcodered]

 

[Nextmanup]

19 hours ago, Bad Things said:

https://thehill.com/video/4120312-watch-live-house-oversight-panel-convenes-hearing-on-ufos-national-security/

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/4118340-ufo-hearing-live-updates-lawmakers-former-officials-strange-sightings/

 

 

There are a bunch of good videos on Youtube with footage from the hearing yesterday, for anyone interested.

 

 

[Bad Things]

[Nextmanup]

12 hours ago, Bad Things said:

...but what if it has!  😱

 

Some of the statements that came out of that Congressional hearing (under oath, for whatever that's worth) include:

 

1) we are in possession of "alien" spacecraft

2) we are in possession of "biologics" from said spacecraft

3) we have known about alien spacecraft on Earth since the 1930s

4) some humans have been physically harmed by "biologics" in human vs. "alien" altercations

 

It is more than a little ironic that the "public hearings" meant to get to the bottom of some of this stuff could not really be "public" at all.  

 

All the good stuff remained unspoken, as David Grusch reiterated over and over that he can't discuss X in a non-classified setting.

 

 

 

[4merper4mer]

35 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:

...but what if it has!  😱

 

Some of the statements that came out of that Congressional hearing (under oath, for whatever that's worth) include:

 

1) we are in possession of "alien" spacecraft

2) we are in possession of "biologics" from said spacecraft

3) we have known about alien spacecraft on Earth since the 1930s

4) some humans have been physically harmed by "biologics" in human vs. "alien" altercations

 

It is more than a little ironic that the "public hearings" meant to get to the bottom of some of this stuff could not really be "public" at all.  

 

All the good stuff remained unspoken, as David Grusch reiterated over and over that he can't discuss X in a non-classified setting.

 

 

 

Basic math is all that is needed to explain the falsehoods in play here.

[ChevyVanMiller]

1 hour ago, Nextmanup said:

...but what if it has!  😱

 

Some of the statements that came out of that Congressional hearing (under oath, for whatever that's worth) include:

 

1) we are in possession of "alien" spacecraft

2) we are in possession of "biologics" from said spacecraft

3) we have known about alien spacecraft on Earth since the 1930s

4) some humans have been physically harmed by "biologics" in human vs. "alien" altercations

 

It is more than a little ironic that the "public hearings" meant to get to the bottom of some of this stuff could not really be "public" at all.  

 

All the good stuff remained unspoken, as David Grusch reiterated over and over that he can't discuss X in a non-classified setting.

 

 

 

Only took the AP 48 hours to acknowledge the story.

https://apnews.com/article/ufos-uaps-congress-whistleblower-spy-aliens-ba8a8cfba353d7b9de29c3d906a69ba7

[Augie]

11 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

Basic math is all that is needed to explain the falsehoods in play here.

Why do you keep mentioning math? You don’t show your work, but you admit the possibility is not zero percent. So math seems to say it’s possible. 

 

Saying “math” does not make anything true. 

[Bad Things]

2 minutes ago, Augie said:

Why do you keep mentioning math? You don’t show your work, but you admit the possibility is not zero percent. So math seems to say it’s possible. 

 

Saying “math” does not make anything true. 

Augie, please don't waste your time.

This guy has been doing his schtick for years now. 

[4merper4mer]

20 minutes ago, Augie said:

Why do you keep mentioning math? You don’t show your work, but you admit the possibility is not zero percent. So math seems to say it’s possible. 

 

Saying “math” does not make anything true. 

It’s inthis thread.

[Augie]

2 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

It’s inthis thread.

 

I’d bury it in a 182 page thread too, if it was attached to me and I couldn’t back it up. 😋

[4merper4mer]

2 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

I’d bury it in a 182 page thread too, if it was attached to me and I couldn’t back it up. 😋

No one has refuted it at all.  

Edited July 29, 2023 by 4merper4mer

[Warcodered]

1 hour ago, 4merper4mer said:

No one has refuted it at all.  

 

[4merper4mer]

8 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

 

Then add that to the list you’re wrong about.

[Joe Ferguson forever]

3 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

Then add that to the list you’re wrong about.

Visit the Green Bank Radio telescope complex in West Virginia.  The real characters from "Contact:" worked there with SETI.  There's no phone signals or even spark plug noise (they use diesels) so they can listen.  The math says it's highly likely there are other sentient beings in the universe...

Edited July 29, 2023 by redtail hawk

[4merper4mer]

1 hour ago, redtail hawk said:

Visit the Green Bank Radio telescope complex in West Virginia.  The real characters from "Contact:" worked there with SETI.  There's no phone signals or even spark plug noise (they use diesels) so they can listen.  The math says it's highly likely there are other sentient beings in the universe...

I would love to visit there and the universe is incredible.  Like many, I look forward to the incredible discoveries to come.  Your statement about math is false.

[Joe Ferguson forever]

5 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

Your statement about math is false.

Many physicists, chemists and astronomers that work there disagree.  The $10 tour we took in a diesel van was guided by the PhD Chemist widow of an astrophysicist who worked there too

[Nextmanup]

5 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

I would love to visit

Oh God, aren't you the "math proves no life in universe" guy?

 

Have you ever actually explained what you are trying to mean by this?

 

Just saw a video yesterday with Michio Kaku discussing the recent UAP stuff; he pointed out  that we now know pretty much every star has at least 1 planet on average.  He said "OF course life is out there!  It's everywhere!" or words to this effect.

 

I guess he hasn't been keeping up with "math." 

 

That shoddy education he got from Cal Berkeley and Harvard isn't up to snuff!

 

 

 

[Augie]

48 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:

Oh God, aren't you the "math proves no life in universe" guy?

 

Have you ever actually explained what you are trying to mean by this?

 

Just saw a video yesterday with Michio Kaku discussing the recent UAP stuff; he pointed out  that we now know pretty much every star has at least 1 planet on average.  He said "OF course life is out there!  It's everywhere!" or words to this effect.

 

I guess he hasn't been keeping up with "math." 

 

That shoddy education he got from Cal Berkeley and Harvard isn't up to snuff!

 

 

 

 

Maybe he got confused by the “sitcom” part of the math?  I know I am.  I’m told the truth is buried in here somewhere. 

 

NEWS FLASH: The universe is a very big place. 

[4merper4mer]

2 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

Many physicists, chemists and astronomers that work there disagree.  The $10 tour we took in a diesel van was guided by the PhD Chemist widow of an astrophysicist who worked there too

 

1 hour ago, Nextmanup said:

Oh God, aren't you the "math proves no life in universe" guy?

 

Have you ever actually explained what you are trying to mean by this?

 

Just saw a video yesterday with Michio Kaku discussing the recent UAP stuff; he pointed out  that we now know pretty much every star has at least 1 planet on average.  He said "OF course life is out there!  It's everywhere!" or words to this effect.

 

I guess he hasn't been keeping up with "math." 

 

That shoddy education he got from Cal Berkeley and Harvard isn't up to snuff!

 

 

 

To Next:

 

1. Yes

2. Yes

3. Kaku is a charlatan

4. See 3

5. I’m sure he’s smart but being a charlatan is where the $$$$$$$$$$$ are.

 

To RTH:

 

They’re either wrong, embellishing or lying but everyone has to make a buck.