4merper4mer Posted July 24, 2020 Posted July 24, 2020 36 minutes ago, Hedge said: A little thing called math says the above cannot be true. Quote
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted July 24, 2020 Posted July 24, 2020 And I keep telling you mathematicians make mistakes all the time. Just saying Quote
4merper4mer Posted July 24, 2020 Posted July 24, 2020 3 hours ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: And I keep telling you mathematicians make mistakes all the time. Just saying It's eighth grade math. Just watch. This will either be completely bogus or some weird spin on words. Like a probe that was manufactured off planet in the space station. Quote
Foxx Posted July 24, 2020 Posted July 24, 2020 11 hours ago, Hedge said: my guess would be Antarctica. https://video.foxnews.com/v/6174546210001?playlist_id=5198073478001#sp=show-clips 1 Quote
4merper4mer Posted July 25, 2020 Posted July 25, 2020 On July 24, 2020 at 7:35 AM, Foxx said: my guess would be Antarctica. https://video.foxnews.com/v/6174546210001?playlist_id=5198073478001#sp=show-clips Aaaaaaaaaaaaaand a big nothing got released yet again. I'd make a crickets joke but crickets are alive and able to communicate to beings on Earth, unlike aliens. Quote
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted July 25, 2020 Posted July 25, 2020 Aliens are people too. When there are numerous unknowns you can’t come up with a real conclusion = number of civilizations with which humans could communicate = mean rate of star formation = fraction of stars that have planets = mean number of planets that could support life per star with planets = fraction of life-supporting planets that develop life = fraction of planets with life where life develops intelligence = fraction of intelligent civilizations that develop communication = mean length of time that civilizations can communicate They can’t even settle on the first humans and languages 1 Quote
4merper4mer Posted July 27, 2020 Posted July 27, 2020 There was supposed to be a big reveal on Friday and at first look there was nothing revealed. Reading between the lines it is clear that the "nothing" was the revelation. It was an announcement that there is nothing out there. Quote
Deranged Rhino Posted July 27, 2020 Posted July 27, 2020 27 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: There was supposed to be a big reveal on Friday and at first look there was nothing revealed. Reading between the lines it is clear that the "nothing" was the revelation. It was an announcement that there is nothing out there. There was a reveal, per the NYT. The Pentagon admitted they have recovered "off world vehicles not of this Earth". That's a major revelation. But it's 2020 so no one noticed or cared. 1 1 Quote
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted July 27, 2020 Posted July 27, 2020 26 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: There was a reveal, per the NYT. The Pentagon admitted they have recovered "off world vehicles not of this Earth". That's a major revelation. But it's 2020 so no one noticed or cared. there is too much other Fake news to talk about my friend. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/23/us/politics/pentagon-ufo-harry-reid-navy.amp.html google is your friend Quote
LeGOATski Posted July 27, 2020 Posted July 27, 2020 The quote was from Eric Davis, who consulted with the Pentagon’s original UFO program and now works for the defense contractor Aerospace Corporation. https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/research/a33413777/pentagon-ufo-program-materials-vehicles/ 2 Quote
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted July 27, 2020 Posted July 27, 2020 1 minute ago, LeGOATski said: The quote was from Eric Davis, who consulted with the Pentagon’s original UFO program and now works for the defense contractor Aerospace Corporation. https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/research/a33413777/pentagon-ufo-program-materials-vehicles/ I was seconds from posting that Quote
Deranged Rhino Posted July 27, 2020 Posted July 27, 2020 12 minutes ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: there is too much other Fake news to talk about my friend. Are you taking the position that it's fake news? Quote
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted July 27, 2020 Posted July 27, 2020 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Are you taking the position that it's fake news? No. The damn sarcasm font isn’t working again. I did say other 1 Quote
Augie Posted July 27, 2020 Posted July 27, 2020 On 7/23/2020 at 10:01 PM, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: And I keep telling you mathematicians make mistakes all the time. Just saying ...............AND, sitcoms aren’t real!!! 1 Quote
Deranged Rhino Posted July 27, 2020 Posted July 27, 2020 1 minute ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: No. The damn sarcasm font isn’t working again. I did say other I didn't think you were, I was just unsure and wanted to clarify. 1 Quote
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted July 27, 2020 Posted July 27, 2020 On this topic you can call me Fox Mulder. 1 Quote
4merper4mer Posted July 27, 2020 Posted July 27, 2020 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: They should try to be more vague. My aunt once found two marbles and now she's my uncle. Off world vehicles could be a tiny probe made on the space station, a rock with organic material, a rock with nothing, the Centenial Falcon or lots of made up crap. Spoiler alert:. Lots of people in any profession are off their rockers. This includes astrophysicists who forgot about math. 1 Quote
LeGOATski Posted July 27, 2020 Posted July 27, 2020 51 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: They should try to be more vague. My aunt once found two marbles and now she's my uncle. Off world vehicles could be a tiny probe made on the space station, a rock with organic material, a rock with nothing, the Centenial Falcon or lots of made up crap. Spoiler alert:. Lots of people in any profession are off their rockers. This includes astrophysicists who forgot about math. I'd be more skeptical if the guy was now retired or unemployed, but he's still working for Aerospace. If he's off his rocker and just riffing to the NYT without Aerospace's consent, then I guess he could be unemployed soon....we'll see. 1 Quote
Deranged Rhino Posted July 28, 2020 Posted July 28, 2020 1 hour ago, LeGOATski said: I'd be more skeptical if the guy was now retired or unemployed, but he's still working for Aerospace. If he's off his rocker and just riffing to the NYT without Aerospace's consent, then I guess he could be unemployed soon....we'll see. It's my understanding he was cleared to give that info to the Times. Both the US Navy and the DoD have already acknowledged the study of the "phenomenon" directly, and the AATIP guys working with Tom Delonge's group have been given the green light by the Pentagon to do what they're doing in public. While I have my reservations about Delonge's group's actual motives, this does seem to be a deliberate and above-board disclosure program with the approval of the US gov't. There's more coming, next from the Senate when they release their report/documents as they are promising to do (not sure a timetable there). 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.