Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 7/15/2019 at 11:05 PM, Foxx said:

this suggests the speed of light is static.

Expand  

Its relevance to this particular discussion is unchanged by your attempted diversion unless you're suggesting that light comes to a grinding halt on a regular basis.  You're not suggesting that are you?

Posted
  On 7/15/2019 at 11:10 PM, 4merper4mer said:

Its relevance to this particular discussion is unchanged by your attempted diversion unless you're suggesting that light comes to a grinding halt on a regular basis.  You're not suggesting that are you?

Expand  

merely suggesting that the speed of light is not static.

Posted
  On 7/15/2019 at 10:49 PM, Patrick_Duffy said:

No it's not.  It means absolutely nothing regarding proof in one way or other in terms of the subject discussed. ?

Expand  

Do yourself a favor.  Find the sitcom math equation on line at ibelieveinmadeupcrap.com or a similar site and plug in your own numbers even if they are based on guesses.  Report back and we'll move on to step two.

Posted (edited)
  On 7/15/2019 at 11:11 PM, Foxx said:

merely suggesting that the speed of light is not static.

Expand  

If you want to keep kicking cans down roads with silly sidesteps and denying reality, that is your option.  There are many roads and lots of kickable cans.  Eventually all of the roads lead to the same place.  And there aren't any aliens or UFOs there.

Edited by 4merper4mer
Posted
  On 7/15/2019 at 11:27 PM, 4merper4mer said:

If you want to keep kicking cans down roads with silly sidesteps and denying reality, that is your option.  There are many roads and lots of kickable cans.  Eventually all of the roads lead to the same place.  And there aren't any aliens or UFOs there.

Expand  

nah, just because you want sitcom maths  to say the speed of light is static, does not mean that i have to let it go unchallenged. your apparent attempt at shaming me for pointing out your failed logic is dubious and calls into question your motivations.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
  On 7/16/2019 at 3:23 AM, 4merper4mer said:

That must have been proven on Earth because there aren't any aliens to prove it anywhere else.

Expand  

 

Lol again, you don't know that for sure as I don't know that for sure. Just still love how you know all the universe has and you are the chosen one. lmao, you don't know ***** ?

 

 

 

 

The-stupidest-people-are-the-ones-that-think-they.jpg

Edited by Patrick_Duffy
Posted
  On 7/16/2019 at 6:37 AM, Patrick_Duffy said:

 

Lol again, you don't know that for sure as I don't know that for sure. Just still love how you know all the universe has and you are the chosen one. lmao, you don't know ***** ?

 

 

 

 

The-stupidest-people-are-the-ones-that-think-they.jpg

Expand  

Where does proper comma use fit into the stupidity calculation?

Posted (edited)
  On 7/15/2019 at 9:21 PM, /dev/null said:

so what's the sitcom math on half a million people running across the desert vs a fleet of A10 Warthogs firing at 70 rounds per second?

Expand  

 

400 must be turned over to the Alien War Lords for transportation back to their home planet and 1 person must survive to tell the harrowing story 

  On 7/15/2019 at 11:05 PM, Foxx said:

this suggests the speed of light is static.

 

Expand  

 

  On 7/15/2019 at 11:10 PM, 4merper4mer said:

Its relevance to this particular discussion is unchanged by your attempted diversion unless you're suggesting that light comes to a grinding halt on a regular basis.  You're not suggesting that are you?

Expand  

 

Good old Math.  Just like with "calculated" statistics you get to pick and choose what "applies" to each equation, ensuring that the data you want is the data "calculated" 

 

Edited by ShadyBillsFan
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 7/15/2019 at 11:10 PM, 4merper4mer said:

Its relevance to this particular discussion is unchanged by your attempted diversion unless you're suggesting that light comes to a grinding halt on a regular basis.  You're not suggesting that are you?

Expand  

Isn't that what a Black Hole does?

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
  On 7/16/2019 at 11:38 AM, ShadyBillsFan said:
Sep 16, 2016 - First off we can blame theorists for the confusion. Light is neither static nor constant, even in vacuum. It is a proportional measurement based 
Expand  

That article was one part ostentatious, one part paranoid, one part unscientific and a thousand parts irrelevant to the conversation.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...