DreReed83 Posted July 28, 2011 Posted July 28, 2011 No thanks. I don't want Kawika Mitchell version 2.0 on this team. This guy can't even stay healthy anymore and I don't want another teams damaged goods.
26CornerBlitz Posted July 28, 2011 Posted July 28, 2011 http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d82107c4b/article/trash-into-treasure-fits-for-five-released-players?module=HP11_content_stream Nick Barnett, LB Why didn't it work out in Green Bay? Barnett's injury history and outspoken nature led the Packers to hand over the reins to Desmond Bishop. While the ninth-year pro still has the skills to play at a high level, the abundance of athleticism and talent at linebacker allowed Green Bay to jettison the veteran on the eve of training camp. Where will he land next? Barnett would fill a void in Buffalo. He would give Chan Gailey a proven winner on the field to provide guidance to a young squad, and his active run-stopping skills would help shore up the defense's biggest weakness. Although the team is toying with the idea of using a hybrid 4-3, Barnett's versatile skills are still an ideal fit -- if he can pass all of the medical evaluations.
DrDawkinstein Posted July 28, 2011 Posted July 28, 2011 Burnett >> Barnett Wish those threads werent merged.
Endless Ike Posted July 28, 2011 Posted July 28, 2011 God I hope this happens, I will laugh and laugh...my best friend was on his HS team and hates his guts...he got kicked off the team for being a ****head punk and went to a different school
Saint Doug Posted July 28, 2011 Posted July 28, 2011 you guys realize that nick barnett and kevin burnett are 2 completely different people right? This will matter not when the Bills decide to sign them both.
cvanvol Posted July 28, 2011 Posted July 28, 2011 ooh yea you're right. 100% right. I was mistaken. He was our leading tackler and a starter on one of the worst defenses in the league. Lets give him a medal. Give me someone who has half his tackles and more game changing ability and I'll take that any day. Quality over quantity. But obviously you don't understand that concept bruh. SO that would be 76 times that a player wouldnt be tackled by our linebacker and got into the secondary.... We would have a much worse defense, but maybe you dont understand that concept Bruh. ooh yea you're right. 100% right. I was mistaken. He was our leading tackler and a starter on one of the worst defenses in the league. Lets give him a medal. Give me someone who has half his tackles and more game changing ability and I'll take that any day. Quality over quantity. But obviously you don't understand that concept bruh. SO that would be 76 times that a player wouldnt be tackled by our linebacker and got into the secondary.... We would have a much worse defense, but maybe you dont understand that concept Bruh.
Recommended Posts