GelMibson Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 I guess you'll do. Aw shucks, I was just filling in for DEXTER since I think he was banned. Some people can see the method to my madness while others just aren't smart enough and think I'm PEACE or this JA character. They must be lawyers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 Aw shucks, I was just filling in for DEXTER since I think he was banned. Some people can see the method to my madness while others just aren't smart enough and think I'm PEACE or this JA character. They must be lawyers? Indeed they are. Worked for the ACLU, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GelMibson Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 Indeed they are. Worked for the ACLU, too. What does JA stand for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 What does JA stand for? John Adams. AKA peace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 What does JA stand for? John Adams, your original account. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peace Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 Yeah, it's best to use quotes around that. This guy is every bit as Christian as my dog is a charcoal grill. And yet, the MSM will continue to identify him that way. It's one thing for them to identify people as "Islamic terrorists." The -ic covers a lot, and there is plenty of wiggle room within the Islam faith/Quran for a follower to justify killing or supporting jihad. There is absolutely no room for Christians to claim that they're killing as prescribed by their faith. If your religious values are to kill, you are not a Christian --- you are 180 degrees from Christianity. Describing someone like this as such is a complete misnomer. There is no wiggle room in the New Testament. Says you. 2000 years of history says elsewise. Christians kill in the name of Christ all the time. Crazy is crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
....lybob Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 Yeah, it's best to use quotes around that. This guy is every bit as Christian as my dog is a charcoal grill. And yet, the MSM will continue to identify him that way. It's one thing for them to identify people as "Islamic terrorists." The -ic covers a lot, and there is plenty of wiggle room within the Islam faith/Quran for a follower to justify killing or supporting jihad. There is absolutely no room for Christians to claim that they're killing as prescribed by their faith. If your religious values are to kill, you are not a Christian --- you are 180 degrees from Christianity. Describing someone like this as such is a complete misnomer. There is no wiggle room in the New Testament. Kinda like an Ayn Rand follower claiming to be Christian and yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 Says you. 2000 years of history says elsewise. Christians kill in the name of Christ all the time. Crazy is crazy. Killing in the name of Christ doesn't make somebody a Christian. It only implies a severe and profound misunderstanding of Christianity. That guy can CALL himself a Christian all he wants, but that doesn't make him one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted July 24, 2011 Share Posted July 24, 2011 In Norway, the annual rate of firearm homicide per 100,000 population was 2005: 0.11 That number just went up for 2011. Killing in the name of Christ doesn't make somebody a Christian. It only implies a severe and profound misunderstanding of Christianity. That guy can CALL himself a Christian all he wants, but that doesn't make him one. Lentils is brain food. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted July 24, 2011 Share Posted July 24, 2011 91 dead. Damn he killed a ton of kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UConn James Posted July 24, 2011 Share Posted July 24, 2011 (edited) Update: It took 90 minutes for police to arrive. Link. !@#$ing... an hour and a half. Why'd they even bother showing up at all? They have modern transportation in Norway, right? And again, this is a place where the PM was going to be later in the day. Nice !@#$ing security there, Olie! Edited July 24, 2011 by UConn James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Hedd Posted July 24, 2011 Share Posted July 24, 2011 I blame the Tea Party. You probably have no clue how close you were with your lame quip. They're also saying now that it's looking like al Qaeda is behind the attack. Norway? Why attack Norway? Who was saying that besides yourself? Most here consider you apolitical, non-partisan whatever. I consider you a boob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted July 24, 2011 Share Posted July 24, 2011 Yeah, it's best to use quotes around that. This guy is every bit as Christian as my dog is a charcoal grill. And yet, the MSM will continue to identify him that way. It's one thing for them to identify people as "Islamic terrorists." The -ic covers a lot, and there is plenty of wiggle room within the Islam faith/Quran for a follower to justify killing or supporting jihad. There is absolutely no room for Christians to claim that they're killing as prescribed by their faith. If your religious values are to kill, you are not a Christian --- you are 180 degrees from Christianity. Describing someone like this as such is a complete misnomer. There is no wiggle room in the New Testament. Does all this rationalization make you feel better? Terrorist attack in the name of Islam: Look at the "Religion of Peace"... Terrorist attack in the name of Christianity: That guy's obviously not a REAL Christian. No hypocrisy there... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GelMibson Posted July 24, 2011 Share Posted July 24, 2011 John Adams, your original account. You are a liberal and "liberals know so much that isn't so". You don't have a clue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted July 24, 2011 Share Posted July 24, 2011 You are a liberal and "liberals know so much that isn't so". You don't have a clue. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GelMibson Posted July 24, 2011 Share Posted July 24, 2011 :lol: Did you use to post as someone called Conner? He was before my time I think, but the way people speak of him makes me think he could have been you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted July 24, 2011 Share Posted July 24, 2011 Did you use to post as someone called Conner? He was before my time I think, but the way people speak of him makes me think he could have been you. Low blow. But then that is what we have come to expect from all your handles. Must be the lawyer in you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GelMibson Posted July 24, 2011 Share Posted July 24, 2011 Low blow. But then that is what we have come to expect from all your handles. Must be the lawyer in you. A lawyer? Really? Furthest thing from the truth, so help me God. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 24, 2011 Share Posted July 24, 2011 Who was saying that besides yourself? CNN, AP, MSNBC, BBC... Most here consider you apolitical, non-partisan whatever. I consider you a boob. That's non-partisan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted July 24, 2011 Share Posted July 24, 2011 CNN, AP, MSNBC, BBC... That's non-partisan. It can go either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts