Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

There are witness reports of a second shooter. Witness reports being what they are, that's questionable but still very possible.

 

Link

 

 

Point the First: The adage is an adage for a reason. When every second counts, police help is just minutes 30 minutes away. :wallbash: Amazing how bold criminals can be when they know no one can/will be shooting back at them, huh? But keep trying to take law-abiding citizens' guns away, Dems! That way we can be just like England, Canada (I read they're apparently going to get rifles and shotguns back under PM Harper later this year) and other socialist paradises where violence never happens and self-defense is never necessary <_< , huh?

 

Point the Second: This was at an event where the Prime Minister was to attend later that day. There were no police or security in place there?!?! (Armed, at least?) Did they believe this was an impenetrable liberal Utopia?!

 

I don't know what's feasible as for the 6 tons of fertilizer. The suspect was apparently a farmer. For mass purchases over a certain tonnage, would it be egregious for the sales company/retailer to have to witness/inspect the fertilizer application to fields? Yeah, it's relatively rare, and yeah it would obviously add to the cost of doing business, but.... Just asking here. What would be the feasibility of that?

In Norway, the annual rate of firearm homicide per 100,000 population was

 

2005: 0.11

 

The U.S. rate for gun deaths in 2005 was 11.5 per 100,000 people

 

I'm not against having guns but you can't get hung up on one event.

  • Replies 146
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

In Norway, the annual rate of firearm homicide per 100,000 population was

 

2005: 0.11

 

The U.S. rate for gun deaths in 2005 was 11.5 per 100,000 people

 

I'm not against having guns but you can't get hung up on one event.

 

 

?????????????????????? Not exactly a proper comparison,

Posted

The man was a nationalist (i.e. anti-multiculturalism). I could see him snapping and walking into a mosque or something (I wouldn't think it's the best way of going about things, but I could see it), but a youth camp?

Some reports that there was a Pro Palestinian Rally at Norway Youth Camp the Day Before the Massacre - don't know if that is true but if it was he might have gone there thinking he'd be shooting Muslims or at least supporters of the Palestinians.

Posted

Some reports that there was a Pro Palestinian Rally at Norway Youth Camp the Day Before the Massacre - don't know if that is true but if it was he might have gone there thinking he'd be shooting Muslims or at least supporters of the Palestinians.

Norway officially backed Palestine's quest for recognition as a UN state just a few days ago.

 

Where's Dexter? Shouldn't be be droning about Jew-led conspiracies by now?

Posted

Islamo-Fascist Fundamentalist Terrorist Bastard! We need to turn the Middle East into a glass parking lot!!!

 

Wait...errr...

 

I wonder who set off the blast.

Posted

Norway officially backed Palestine's quest for recognition as a UN state just a few days ago.

 

Where's Dexter? Shouldn't be be droning about Jew-led conspiracies by now?

 

It was probably the ZIONISTS that did this (blast) and they are trying to make it out to look like ISLAMIC TERRORISTS.

Posted

I wonder who set off the blast.

 

As was said yesterday, with a 2 hour + interval b/w the blast and the shootings, it's entirely possible that he could have acted alone.

 

And like I wrote above, they are looking into witness accounts that there was a second shooter (witness accounts are, however, all too often unreliable).

Posted

That's not a very nice way to speak to me. Why do you think I am PEACE or whoever this JA is?

 

Because it is abundantly clear you are an alt. You had a point at first, now you have jumped the shark. !@#$ing lawyers.

Posted (edited)

Islamo-Fascist Fundamentalist Terrorist Bastard! We need to turn the Middle East into a glass parking lot!!!

 

Wait...errr...

 

Gene, you're just embarrassing yourself. (Well, to a further degree than you already have. Which is tantamount to saying "Infinity plus 1.")

 

What point do you think you're trying to make?

 

That because terror comes from multiple sources/warped ideologies, that combating it wherever it appears is... what?

 

Maybe you should try not attacking an extreme fringe from the opposite extreme fringe. All it proves is that you're an equal idiot.

Edited by UConn James
Posted

It was probably the ZIONISTS that did this (blast) and they are trying to make it out to look like ISLAMIC TERRORISTS.

I guess you'll do.

Posted

As was said yesterday, with a 2 hour + interval b/w the blast and the shootings, it's entirely possible that he could have acted alone.

 

And like I wrote above, they are looking into witness accounts that there was a second shooter (witness accounts are, however, all too often unreliable).

 

What gets me is because his Facebook profile lists him as "conservative" and his religion as "christian" the media is describing him as a fundamentalist, christian nationalistic terrorist. Maybe too many labels, way too soon, eh? Of course Frenkle will use this as a reason to bash all religions.

Posted

What gets me is because his Facebook profile lists him as "conservative" and his religion as "christian" the media is describing him as a fundamentalist, christian nationalistic terrorist. Maybe too many labels, way too soon, eh? Of course Frenkle will use this as a reason to bash all religions.

He was definitely a nationalist. Given the country that he lived in, that he was a fundamentalist christian is doubtful.

Posted

Because it is abundantly clear you are an alt. You had a point at first, now you have jumped the shark. !@#$ing lawyers.

 

Prove that beyond all reasonable doubt.

Posted (edited)

What gets me is because his Facebook profile lists him as "conservative" and his religion as "christian" the media is describing him as a fundamentalist, christian nationalistic terrorist. Maybe too many labels, way too soon, eh? Of course Frenkle will use this as a reason to bash all religions.

 

Yeah, it's best to use quotes around that. This guy is every bit as Christian as my dog is a charcoal grill.

 

And yet, the MSM will continue to identify him that way.

 

It's one thing for them to identify people as "Islamic terrorists." The -ic covers a lot, and there is plenty of wiggle room within the Islam faith/Quran for a follower to justify killing or supporting jihad.

 

There is absolutely no room for Christians to claim that they're killing as prescribed by their faith. If your religious values are to kill, you are not a Christian --- you are 180 degrees from Christianity. Describing someone like this as such is a complete misnomer. There is no wiggle room in the New Testament.

Edited by UConn James
×
×
  • Create New...