Dante Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 I really hope you're joking. Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveinElma Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/10/06/police-seek-thugs-suspected-of-series-of-robberies-in-lower-manhattan-subways/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/10/06/police-seek-thugs-suspected-of-series-of-robberies-in-lower-manhattan-subways/ Umm AD crusade? Ban this putz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 Umm AD crusade? Ban this putz. Well, this is the "inner city youth mob attacks" thread.....it's not like he starts a new one for each attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 Umm AD crusade? Ban this putz. You know, he might be a one trick pony, but tell me on an individual basis on what he posts, what reason is there to ban him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 You know, he might be a one trick pony, but tell me on an individual basis on what he posts, what reason is there to ban him? yup. Really it's just news. Why would anyone want to censor that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 yup. Really it's just news. Why would anyone want to censor that? Because all his posts are racially motivated. It really is that simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveinElma Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 Because all his posts are racially motivated. It really is that simple. Like Hank Williams JR? Or Occupy Wall Street? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 Because all his posts are racially motivated. It really is that simple. Would BO speaking at the black caucus be considered racially motivated? Hard question. Consider all the angles before you condemn people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 (edited) Because all his posts are racially motivated. It really is that simple. So, your solution is to ban him? Why don't you engage him in a discussion and get him to see the "error of his ways"? The link below pretty much tells it like it is. Liberals love to legislate and ban according to their beliefs, while conservatives tend to tell people they can do what they want unless the are screwing with the rest of society. http://ttoes.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/liberal-or-conservative-whats-the-difference/ Make sure to read the comments. They sure are amusing. Edited October 8, 2011 by 3rdnlng Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 Would BO speaking at the black caucus be considered racially motivated? Hard question. Consider all the angles before you condemn people. "black caucus" Nothin' racial there. Nope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 So, your solution is to ban him? Why don't you engage him in a discussion and get him to see the "error of his ways"? The link below pretty much tells it like it is. Liberals love to legislate and ban according to their beliefs, while conservatives tend to tell people they can do what they want unless the are screwing with the rest of society. http://ttoes.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/liberal-or-conservative-whats-the-difference/ Make sure to read the comments. They sure are amusing. I do not care to discuss anything with such a contemptible person. He has been banned before and this should be not be up to debate. He is crusading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 I do not care to discuss anything with such a contemptible person. He has been banned before and this should be not be up to debate. He is crusading. I could have saved you some time by posting your answer in my prior comments to you. You prove the point I was making in my link. Your solution is to ban someone or legislate against something that you don't agree with. If your ideas and thought processes are so superior, why don't you put them on display and debate him into the ground? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveinElma Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 I do not care to discuss anything with such a contemptible person. He has been banned before and this should be not be up to debate. He is crusading. So everything has been said about how liberal entitlement programs have led to the collapse of urban america? I suppose then too that we shouldn't have any more threads on the deficit, obama, unions, or unemployment or any other of the issues that have torpedoed the economy. Those have been talked about too much here and are making me uncomfortable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 So everything has been said about how liberal entitlement programs have led to the collapse of urban america? I suppose then too that we shouldn't have any more threads on the deficit, obama, unions, or unemployment or any other of the issues that have torpedoed the economy. Those have been talked about too much here and are making me uncomfortable. Except that your confusing intelligent discussion with...whatever the hell it is you're doing. It's not your politics that's irritating. It's that your an !@#$. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 "black caucus" Nothin' racial there. Nope. Can you imagine Bush speaking at the "White caucus"? About advancing whites? Wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 So, your solution is to ban him? Why don't you engage him in a discussion and get him to see the "error of his ways"? The link below pretty much tells it like it is. Liberals love to legislate and ban according to their beliefs, while conservatives tend to tell people they can do what they want unless the are screwing with the rest of society. http://ttoes.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/liberal-or-conservative-whats-the-difference/ Make sure to read the comments. They sure are amusing. He forgot one: If a conservative is religious, he tries to wedge said religion into the classroom with silly phrases such as "teach the controversy." If a liberal is religious, he reads The Communist Manifesto on a weekly basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 So everything has been said about how liberal entitlement programs have led to the collapse of urban america? I suppose then too that we shouldn't have any more threads on the deficit, obama, unions, or unemployment or any other of the issues that have torpedoed the economy. Those have been talked about too much here and are making me uncomfortable. You are a racist and on a crusade. You have been banned before for the same ****. This is not rocket science, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveinElma Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 You are a racist and on a crusade. You have been banned before for the same ****. This is not rocket science, I have? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 (edited) He forgot one: If a conservative is religious, he tries to wedge said religion into the classroom with silly phrases such as "teach the controversy." If a liberal is religious, he reads The Communist Manifesto on a weekly basis. I think you are taking both positions to the extreme. Regardless, Booster is wrong here. His call to ban Dave is baseless and just smacks as his own crusade to ban Dave. Edited October 8, 2011 by 3rdnlng Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts