Dante Posted September 29, 2011 Posted September 29, 2011 On 9/28/2011 at 11:04 PM, Rob said: I really hope you're joking. Yes
DaveinElma Posted October 7, 2011 Posted October 7, 2011 http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/10/06/police-seek-thugs-suspected-of-series-of-robberies-in-lower-manhattan-subways/
Booster4324 Posted October 7, 2011 Posted October 7, 2011 On 10/7/2011 at 9:19 PM, DaveinElma said: http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/10/06/police-seek-thugs-suspected-of-series-of-robberies-in-lower-manhattan-subways/ Umm AD crusade? Ban this putz.
KD in CA Posted October 8, 2011 Posted October 8, 2011 On 10/7/2011 at 11:01 PM, Booster4324 said: Umm AD crusade? Ban this putz. Well, this is the "inner city youth mob attacks" thread.....it's not like he starts a new one for each attack.
3rdnlng Posted October 8, 2011 Posted October 8, 2011 On 10/7/2011 at 11:01 PM, Booster4324 said: Umm AD crusade? Ban this putz. You know, he might be a one trick pony, but tell me on an individual basis on what he posts, what reason is there to ban him?
Dante Posted October 8, 2011 Posted October 8, 2011 On 10/8/2011 at 1:15 AM, 3rdnlng said: You know, he might be a one trick pony, but tell me on an individual basis on what he posts, what reason is there to ban him? yup. Really it's just news. Why would anyone want to censor that?
Booster4324 Posted October 8, 2011 Posted October 8, 2011 On 10/8/2011 at 1:20 AM, Dante said: yup. Really it's just news. Why would anyone want to censor that? Because all his posts are racially motivated. It really is that simple.
DaveinElma Posted October 8, 2011 Posted October 8, 2011 On 10/8/2011 at 1:34 AM, Booster4324 said: Because all his posts are racially motivated. It really is that simple. Like Hank Williams JR? Or Occupy Wall Street?
Jim in Anchorage Posted October 8, 2011 Posted October 8, 2011 On 10/8/2011 at 1:34 AM, Booster4324 said: Because all his posts are racially motivated. It really is that simple. Would BO speaking at the black caucus be considered racially motivated? Hard question. Consider all the angles before you condemn people.
3rdnlng Posted October 8, 2011 Posted October 8, 2011 (edited) On 10/8/2011 at 1:34 AM, Booster4324 said: Because all his posts are racially motivated. It really is that simple. So, your solution is to ban him? Why don't you engage him in a discussion and get him to see the "error of his ways"? The link below pretty much tells it like it is. Liberals love to legislate and ban according to their beliefs, while conservatives tend to tell people they can do what they want unless the are screwing with the rest of society. http://ttoes.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/liberal-or-conservative-whats-the-difference/ Make sure to read the comments. They sure are amusing. Edited October 8, 2011 by 3rdnlng
KD in CA Posted October 8, 2011 Posted October 8, 2011 On 10/8/2011 at 2:56 AM, Jim in Anchorage said: Would BO speaking at the black caucus be considered racially motivated? Hard question. Consider all the angles before you condemn people. "black caucus" Nothin' racial there. Nope.
Booster4324 Posted October 8, 2011 Posted October 8, 2011 On 10/8/2011 at 12:48 PM, 3rdnlng said: So, your solution is to ban him? Why don't you engage him in a discussion and get him to see the "error of his ways"? The link below pretty much tells it like it is. Liberals love to legislate and ban according to their beliefs, while conservatives tend to tell people they can do what they want unless the are screwing with the rest of society. http://ttoes.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/liberal-or-conservative-whats-the-difference/ Make sure to read the comments. They sure are amusing. I do not care to discuss anything with such a contemptible person. He has been banned before and this should be not be up to debate. He is crusading.
3rdnlng Posted October 8, 2011 Posted October 8, 2011 On 10/8/2011 at 1:06 PM, Booster4324 said: I do not care to discuss anything with such a contemptible person. He has been banned before and this should be not be up to debate. He is crusading. I could have saved you some time by posting your answer in my prior comments to you. You prove the point I was making in my link. Your solution is to ban someone or legislate against something that you don't agree with. If your ideas and thought processes are so superior, why don't you put them on display and debate him into the ground?
DaveinElma Posted October 8, 2011 Posted October 8, 2011 On 10/8/2011 at 1:06 PM, Booster4324 said: I do not care to discuss anything with such a contemptible person. He has been banned before and this should be not be up to debate. He is crusading. So everything has been said about how liberal entitlement programs have led to the collapse of urban america? I suppose then too that we shouldn't have any more threads on the deficit, obama, unions, or unemployment or any other of the issues that have torpedoed the economy. Those have been talked about too much here and are making me uncomfortable.
DC Tom Posted October 8, 2011 Posted October 8, 2011 On 10/8/2011 at 1:43 PM, DaveinElma said: So everything has been said about how liberal entitlement programs have led to the collapse of urban america? I suppose then too that we shouldn't have any more threads on the deficit, obama, unions, or unemployment or any other of the issues that have torpedoed the economy. Those have been talked about too much here and are making me uncomfortable. Except that your confusing intelligent discussion with...whatever the hell it is you're doing. It's not your politics that's irritating. It's that your an !@#$.
Jim in Anchorage Posted October 8, 2011 Posted October 8, 2011 On 10/8/2011 at 1:00 PM, KD in CT said: "black caucus" Nothin' racial there. Nope. Can you imagine Bush speaking at the "White caucus"? About advancing whites? Wow.
LeviF Posted October 8, 2011 Posted October 8, 2011 On 10/8/2011 at 12:48 PM, 3rdnlng said: So, your solution is to ban him? Why don't you engage him in a discussion and get him to see the "error of his ways"? The link below pretty much tells it like it is. Liberals love to legislate and ban according to their beliefs, while conservatives tend to tell people they can do what they want unless the are screwing with the rest of society. http://ttoes.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/liberal-or-conservative-whats-the-difference/ Make sure to read the comments. They sure are amusing. He forgot one: If a conservative is religious, he tries to wedge said religion into the classroom with silly phrases such as "teach the controversy." If a liberal is religious, he reads The Communist Manifesto on a weekly basis.
Booster4324 Posted October 8, 2011 Posted October 8, 2011 On 10/8/2011 at 1:43 PM, DaveinElma said: So everything has been said about how liberal entitlement programs have led to the collapse of urban america? I suppose then too that we shouldn't have any more threads on the deficit, obama, unions, or unemployment or any other of the issues that have torpedoed the economy. Those have been talked about too much here and are making me uncomfortable. You are a racist and on a crusade. You have been banned before for the same ****. This is not rocket science,
DaveinElma Posted October 8, 2011 Posted October 8, 2011 On 10/8/2011 at 4:59 PM, Booster4324 said: You are a racist and on a crusade. You have been banned before for the same ****. This is not rocket science, I have?
3rdnlng Posted October 8, 2011 Posted October 8, 2011 (edited) On 10/8/2011 at 4:58 PM, LeviF91 said: He forgot one: If a conservative is religious, he tries to wedge said religion into the classroom with silly phrases such as "teach the controversy." If a liberal is religious, he reads The Communist Manifesto on a weekly basis. I think you are taking both positions to the extreme. Regardless, Booster is wrong here. His call to ban Dave is baseless and just smacks as his own crusade to ban Dave. Edited October 8, 2011 by 3rdnlng
Recommended Posts