Da Big Man Posted June 28, 2011 Posted June 28, 2011 (edited) Don't let facts get in the way of your fantasy Da Big Idiot. Yeah again you know how I know I am right because true blind, bag over their head jerks like you tell me I am wrong. Show what isn't fact Jerktex. 70%, 45%, what is the difference? Link The difference is polls are taken by liberal news outlets and Democratic run researchers and are skewed. If I go to Greenwich village or Allentown and poll 1000 people my results will be completely different than if I go to Cheektowaga, East Amherst, Hamburg, Eden, Lancaster, Depew, Clarence....get it! Probably not,you live in the grey area don't you? Edited June 28, 2011 by Da Big Man
Da Big Man Posted June 28, 2011 Posted June 28, 2011 People that upset by this law crack me up!! So funny. People didn't mind Hitler either until he came for them. You people are drowning in the new Sodom and Gemorrah and don't realize it or don't care. If not now then when? Well, you sure showed him. I figured that if I stooped to his simple minded level that he may understand a tad of the macro idea I am trying to convey.
DC Tom Posted June 28, 2011 Posted June 28, 2011 People didn't mind Hitler either until he came for them. You people are drowning in the new Sodom and Gemorrah and don't realize it or don't care. If not now then when? Worst...Hitler reference...EVER! Where's crayonz? We need crayonz. Only crayonz can match this level of stupid.
Adam Posted June 28, 2011 Posted June 28, 2011 If you don't know what that means you are worse off than I thought. And since when is truth hate mongering. Watch tv and listen to the radio. Will and Grace...I kissed a girl and I liked it. The list of slow desensitization goes on and on. Now our moldable, vulnerable children are growing up in a society where same sexes can marry. Don't think about yourself and 6 feet in front of you think of everyone. Not what is PC but what is good for everybody You are missing the true agenda behind the action. Forget that it is amoral, asocial, anti religious, anti biological, void of values and anti monogamous. It is a kill shot at mainstream society and a bad example for our helpless children. Not to mention the fact that with all the woes of NYS these crooked politicans chose to cater to a small portion of NY. Blind obedience to the liberal agenda is the most dangerous mind set. Name one incorrect thing in my post or is it just an attempt to get a Republican to flee...I guess next you will call me a racist or the nondiscursive term " homophobe". Where is the nonsense? please show me...with your infinite wisdom The nonsense is that they are trying to indoctrinate us- this makes no sense- they are not nazis and not trying to indoctrinate anyone. YOU are trying to indoctrinate people with these statements. There is no such thing as blind obedience to a liberal or conservative agenda- there ARE people who are blindly obedient to the agenda of certain politicians. Furthermore, marriage SHOULD NOT be a right of a couple- it should be the right of any living human individual to marry any other willing human individual, regardless of color, creed, religion or orientation. I won't call you the above terms, but I reserve the right to call you or anyone else a troll- and I promise not to use fire or acid on you (If you don't get that, you don't wanna know)
Peace Posted June 28, 2011 Posted June 28, 2011 (edited) I won't call you the above terms, but I reserve the right to call you or anyone else a troll- and I promise not to use fire or acid on you (If you don't get that, you don't wanna know) Da Big Man is never, and should never be, taken seriously. He adds about as much to the board as crayonz, minus the Canadian references. Edited June 28, 2011 by Peace
Delete This Account Posted June 28, 2011 Posted June 28, 2011 (edited) If you don't know what that means you are worse off than I thought. And since when is truth hate mongering. Watch tv and listen to the radio. Will and Grace...I kissed a girl and I liked it. The list of slow desensitization goes on and on. Now our moldable, vulnerable children are growing up in a society where same sexes can marry. Don't think about yourself and 6 feet in front of you think of everyone. Not what is PC but what is good for everybody i kissed a girl and i liked it, too. perhaps, you should try it some time. and as Paul Reiser said about two women kissing: "I agree with both of them." vulnerable children, my behind. confused children who have to put up with bigotry and so-called "christian" values are the ones who are left hiding, because they are left to feel ashamed by the likes of social butchers and gate-keepers of what's "acceptable," and who have deemed their homosexual leanings as being "deviant," and "abhorent," and "unnatural," which is so far removed from the truth that it would be laughable, if it weren't so obtuse and sad. hiding behind your so-called value system and referring it to be some kind of "truth" does not make it so. it's pure and utter bigotry. jw Edited June 28, 2011 by john wawrow
The Poojer Posted June 28, 2011 Author Posted June 28, 2011 (edited) I linked the adoption stipulations from the NYS Website about adoptions....are you saying they have their facts straight, or are you simply ignoring the facts I pointed out? Yeah again you know how I know I am right because true blind, bag over their head jerks like you tell me I am wrong. Show what isn't fact Jerktex. The difference is polls are taken by liberal news outlets and Democratic run researchers and are skewed. If I go to Greenwich village or Allentown and poll 1000 people my results will be completely different than if I go to Cheektowaga, East Amherst, Hamburg, Eden, Lancaster, Depew, Clarence....get it! Probably not,you live in the grey area don't you? confused children who have to put up with bigotry and so-called "christian" values are the ones who are left hiding, because they are left to feel ashamed by the likes of social butchers and gate-keepers of what's "acceptable," and who have deemed their homosexual leanings as being "deviant," and "abhorent," and "unnatural," which is so far removed from the truth that it would be laughable, if it weren't so obtuse and sad. :worthy: :worthy: Very well put! Edited June 28, 2011 by The Poojer
Buftex Posted June 29, 2011 Posted June 29, 2011 Well, you sure showed him. Jim left the Chef thing for this?
OCinBuffalo Posted July 8, 2011 Posted July 8, 2011 everyone can get married now, sounds fair to me. if OCinBuffalo wanted to marry a goat, i'd be fine with that. what's the big deal? jw Perhaps you should ask Governor Cuomo why he made such a big deal out of limiting the liability of religious organizations and their members and protecting them from lawsuits. If it's "no big deal" then why did he bother to go through all that negotiation for the last 3 months? Oh, I know why: because if he didn't, the law wouldn't have passed. Idiot. Moreover, he was concerned, rightly, about providing gay people the rights they deserve...and not concerned, rightly, with providing the ACLU and other militant political organizations the pretext to declare war on religion and the religious. Or, perhaps you are simply ignorant? Perhaps willfully so? Perhaps you'd like to be coy and pretend that the usual assclowns would not have taken a gay marriage law without these restrictions, and run wild suing everybody. Or, perhaps you are just too dumb to see the obvious unintended consequences even when they are staring you in the face, like most liberals of the last 60 years. In all cases, you should ask Gov. Cuomo, not me, why it was such a big deal. The only thing left is what you think won't happen: people suing for the rights to other "alternative" marriages based on this law. Hey, personally I never cared about any of this, I still don't, I just wanted to expose the buffoons here and I did. Incidentally, I wouldn't care about the other "alternatives" either....provided they: 1. think it through first 2. remove the emotional, Hallmark-moment seeking people from the room 3. don't let people like you, or other far-left loons, have any part in the process 4. create equitable laws that deal with ALL consequences Because, as we know: "If you want something to be done, let the far-left be in charge of doing the opposite!TM"
Delete This Account Posted July 11, 2011 Posted July 11, 2011 Perhaps you should ask Governor Cuomo why he made such a big deal out of limiting the liability of religious organizations and their members and protecting them from lawsuits. If it's "no big deal" then why did he bother to go through all that negotiation for the last 3 months? Oh, I know why: because if he didn't, the law wouldn't have passed. Idiot. Moreover, he was concerned, rightly, about providing gay people the rights they deserve...and not concerned, rightly, with providing the ACLU and other militant political organizations the pretext to declare war on religion and the religious. Or, perhaps you are simply ignorant? Perhaps willfully so? Perhaps you'd like to be coy and pretend that the usual assclowns would not have taken a gay marriage law without these restrictions, and run wild suing everybody. Or, perhaps you are just too dumb to see the obvious unintended consequences even when they are staring you in the face, like most liberals of the last 60 years. In all cases, you should ask Gov. Cuomo, not me, why it was such a big deal. The only thing left is what you think won't happen: people suing for the rights to other "alternative" marriages based on this law. Hey, personally I never cared about any of this, I still don't, I just wanted to expose the buffoons here and I did. Incidentally, I wouldn't care about the other "alternatives" either....provided they: 1. think it through first 2. remove the emotional, Hallmark-moment seeking people from the room 3. don't let people like you, or other far-left loons, have any part in the process 4. create equitable laws that deal with ALL consequences Because, as we know: "If you want something to be done, let the far-left be in charge of doing the opposite!TM" seriously, this entire post is an example of why nothing gets done. it nitpicks and name-calls, further polarizing any attempt at discussion with its accusatory us-versus-them mentality that's foolhardy, blowhardy and ruinous. it's really too bad. and i know, you'll come back with the .. "but, but, but ..." but i don't want to hear it. i'm tired of the demagogary when it comes to political issues. it's so freaking boring. so spare me. jw
OCinBuffalo Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 seriously, this entire post is an example of why nothing gets done. it nitpicks and name-calls, further polarizing any attempt at discussion with its accusatory us-versus-them mentality that's foolhardy, blowhardy and ruinous. it's really too bad. and i know, you'll come back with the .. "but, but, but ..." but i don't want to hear it. i'm tired of the demagogary when it comes to political issues. it's so freaking boring. so spare me. jw Yeah, coming from you this is hilarious. ALL people like you have done since 2003 is exactly what you are talking about.... ...and now that it gets turned back on you...and that means you are going to lose election after election, and you know it... ....you don't want to hear it? Too bad, tough schit. deal with it. You could have spared us since 2003, and you chose not to. Payback is a bitchass, isn't it?
Buftex Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 Yeah, coming from you this is hilarious. ALL people like you have done since 2003 is exactly what you are talking about.... ...and now that it gets turned back on you...and that means you are going to lose election after election, and you know it... ....you don't want to hear it? Too bad, tough schit. deal with it. You could have spared us since 2003, and you chose not to. Payback is a bitchass, isn't it? You off your meds again, sweety?
OCinBuffalo Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 You off your meds again, sweety? I think you have me confused with another poster regarding the meds thing... ...and, I noticed you don't deny what I am saying(because you can't) all you can do is, lamely, attack the messenger. Ironic: since this is they type of behavior that I am pointing to above.
Da Big Man Posted July 17, 2011 Posted July 17, 2011 i kissed a girl and i liked it, too. perhaps, you should try it some time. and as Paul Reiser said about two women kissing: "I agree with both of them." vulnerable children, my behind. confused children who have to put up with bigotry and so-called "christian" values are the ones who are left hiding, because they are left to feel ashamed by the likes of social butchers and gate-keepers of what's "acceptable," and who have deemed their homosexual leanings as being "deviant," and "abhorent," and "unnatural," which is so far removed from the truth that it would be laughable, if it weren't so obtuse and sad. hiding behind your so-called value system and referring it to be some kind of "truth" does not make it so. it's pure and utter bigotry. jw In 1996 I went to a NYS college and as a SocialPsychology major I learned about homosexuality in a book called ABNORMAL PSYCH. It has oozed through the pours of society slowly for 15 years and now we are drowning in it. If we don't change this course, we will all reap what we sow and those of you who backed homosexuality will be the first to say how did this happen. This is all part of a much larger agenda and when it comes complete we will all be F@#$ed. This country needs to stop pandering to the bottom 10% and start worrying about problems that effect 100% of us. The nonsense is that they are trying to indoctrinate us- this makes no sense- they are not nazis and not trying to indoctrinate anyone. YOU are trying to indoctrinate people with these statements. There is no such thing as blind obedience to a liberal or conservative agenda- there ARE people who are blindly obedient to the agenda of certain politicians. Furthermore, marriage SHOULD NOT be a right of a couple- it should be the right of any living human individual to marry any other willing human individual, regardless of color, creed, religion or orientation. I won't call you the above terms, but I reserve the right to call you or anyone else a troll- and I promise not to use fire or acid on you (If you don't get that, you don't wanna know) I agree with you that marriage should be open, but only heterosexuals. To equate this new term of sexual orientation yo equality is PC crazy.
DC Tom Posted July 18, 2011 Posted July 18, 2011 In 1996 I went to a NYS college and as a SocialPsychology major I learned about homosexuality in a book called ABNORMAL PSYCH. What book is that? Or did you mean 1956?
LeviF Posted July 18, 2011 Posted July 18, 2011 What book is that? Or did you mean 1956? He cheaped out and got an earlier edition, used.
Jim in Anchorage Posted July 18, 2011 Posted July 18, 2011 I notice " I think gays are wonderful,that proves I'm enlightened" Esmonde loves it- Things are up
Peace Posted July 18, 2011 Posted July 18, 2011 In 1996 I went to a NYS college and as a SocialPsychology major I learned about homosexuality in a book called ABNORMAL PSYCH. It has oozed through the pours of society slowly for 15 years and now we are drowning in it. If we don't change this course, we will all reap what we sow and those of you who backed homosexuality will be the first to say how did this happen. This is all part of a much larger agenda and when it comes complete we will all be F@#$ed. This country needs to stop pandering to the bottom 10% and start worrying about problems that effect 100% of us. I agree with you that marriage should be open, but only heterosexuals. To equate this new term of sexual orientation yo equality is PC crazy. Mmm, trolly.
Recommended Posts