Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Every other reporter is more credible than him right now. I'm sorry one normally does not see a "reporter" jumping up on the stage and taking over a press conference. Most reporters sit in the crowd and ask questions. Even those who broke a story and were right all a long.

 

So since he's the one that broke the story, why can't he state how he came in possession with the photos? Why is he not releasing the another photo... the story has been completely blown open releasing anything else just makes him look like he's piling on.

In fairness, most reporters don't have a team of douche bag politicians smearing them the way team Weenie did in claiming Breitbart was the hacker who perpetrated the whole fiasco.

  • Replies 452
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Why "question" someone when EVERYTHING they have put forth has checked out as bonafide?

 

And why does he have to prove to YOU that his motives are clean.

 

Typical leftard Alinksy tactic.....foist a label (like racism) on your oppoistion and then demand they disprove it, which is impossible.

 

tell ya what....Breitbart will have to "prove" his motives are "just" when Joy Behar has to "prove" she isnt a c-nt.

 

Deal?

 

 

To be quite honest, I didn't question Breitbart until after the statements he made yesterday. Those statements make me believe his motives are NOT clean.

 

Leftard.. nice name. Typical BS that makes people not want to actually discuss things. Makes you look so credible as well. Talking about foisting a label. Is that like Obama is a Socialist? Obama is not from the country? Obama is muslim... racist... etc., etc. Come on don't act all high and mighty like your party doesn't toss out labels. By the way, I'm not a big fan of placing labels on people.

 

In fairness, most reporters don't have a team of douche bag politicians smearing them the way team Weenie did in claiming Breitbart was the hacker who perpetrated the whole fiasco.

 

 

What other politicians smeared Breitbart over this?

Posted

To be quite honest, I didn't question Breitbart until after the statements he made yesterday. Those statements make me believe his motives are NOT clean.

Breitbart has been hawking a new book for three weeks. Is it really so hard for you to connect the dots? Did you also believe Trump was running for President? :lol:

Posted

Every other reporter is more credible than him right now. I'm sorry one normally does not see a "reporter" jumping up on the stage and taking over a press conference. Most reporters sit in the crowd and ask questions. Even those who broke a story and were right all a long.

 

So since he's the one that broke the story, why can't he state how he came in possession with the photos? Why is he not releasing the another photo... the story has been completely blown open releasing anything else just makes him look like he's piling on.

 

 

Reveal his source? Are you kidding? Sources are how reporters make their living. If he revealed his source do you honestly think that source or any other source would want to tell him anything. God you're an idiot.

 

And he didnt take over the press conference. Other reporters told him to get up to the podium because they couldnt hear him responding to numorus questions from other reporters. In addition it was around 2 PM while the Weiner presser was to start at 4 PM

 

 

4th time..........Please list for me the "Typical Reporters" you have in mind.

Posted (edited)

The only thing Andrew Breitbart is "guilty" of is being an attention hog. But according to pBills, that makes his motives "not clean."

 

Got that?

 

NOT whether or not what he or his 'big" sites reports is true....but what his 'motives' are.

 

By the way, you idiot....Breitbart himself has ADMITTED what his "motives" are. All you need to do is take a peek at the COVER of his !@#$ing book....you dont even have to crack it open.

Edited by RkFast
Posted

Breitbart has been hawking a new book for three weeks. Is it really so hard for you to connect the dots? Did you also believe Trump was running for President? :lol:

 

 

Did not know about his book. Did not believe Trump was going to run.... do not believe Palin is going to run either.

Posted

The only thing Andrew Breitbart is "guilty" of is being an attention hog. But according to pBills, that makes his motives "not clean."

 

Got that?

 

NOT whether or not what he or his 'big" sites reports is true....but what his 'motives' are.

 

By the way, you idiot....Breitbart himself has ADMITTED what his "motives" are. All you need to do is take a peek at the COVER of his !@#$ing book....you dont even have to crack it open.

 

Breitbart is an !@#$. I hadn't really seen a lot of him being interviewed in the press, until yesterday, and a few weeks ago on Real Time. He kind of reminds me of Bill O'Riley. Not stupid, by any means, but just desperate for people to like him, and wanting his "just due" on everything. Weiner has nobody to blame but himself for his current situation, but pretending his intent is anything beyond just wanting to "take people down" is giving him too much credit.

Posted

Breitbart is an !@#$. I hadn't really seen a lot of him being interviewed in the press, until yesterday, and a few weeks ago on Real Time. He kind of reminds me of Bill O'Riley. Not stupid, by any means, but just desperate for people to like him, and wanting his "just due" on everything. Weiner has nobody to blame but himself for his current situation, but pretending his intent is anything beyond just wanting to "take people down" is giving him too much credit.

 

 

Don't you liberals have another messenger target to go after, TMZ?...

 

http://www.tmz.com/2011/06/06/anthony-weiner-congressman-sex-text-twitter-kcover-up-facebook-photo-women-admitted-wrongdoing-press-conference-penis-picture-apologized/

 

Weiner lied in yesterday's press conference when he said that he didn't attempt to tell people to lie to cover this up. I suppose TMZ is an !@#$ now?

Posted

Don't you liberals have another messenger target to go after, TMZ?...

 

http://www.tmz.com/2011/06/06/anthony-weiner-congressman-sex-text-twitter-kcover-up-facebook-photo-women-admitted-wrongdoing-press-conference-penis-picture-apologized/

 

Weiner lied in yesterday's press conference when he said that he didn't attempt to tell people to lie to cover this up. I suppose TMZ is an !@#$ now?

 

 

TMZ has always been an !@#$!

 

Weiner has always been an !@#$ as well. Nobody wins in this situation. I just find it ironic that so many of you are praising Breitbart, as if he is somehow some kind of god. Weiner has only himself to blame. He is stupid as hell for thinking none of this would get out.

Posted

TMZ has always been an !@#$!

 

Weiner has always been an !@#$ as well. Nobody wins in this situation. I just find it ironic that so many of you are praising Breitbart, as if he is somehow some kind of god. Weiner has only himself to blame. He is stupid as hell for thinking none of this would get out.

 

 

I think Breitbart is an attention whore....

 

But I ALSO think he IS a God and I LOVE him becuase hes taking a page out of the left's playbook and using it with impunity. He is also teaching the right to grow a sack and FIGHT, instead of whine. Hes teaching the right to call the left on their Alinsky-fed bull **** and fight back.

Posted

Yes, it was everybody's fault but Weiner. Probably those Koch brothers taking photos of Weiner's dick and posting them on the internet and forcing Weinter to give a press conferece to lie and tell everyone he did it.

 

Ahhh, progressives. Always the victims.

In this case wouldn't it be the Kroch brothers?

Posted

In this case wouldn't it be the Kroch brothers?

Until we start seeing the photos that were sent to Weiner by the porn chick, in which case we can easily go back to blaming "bush."

Posted

Until we start seeing the photos that were sent to Weiner by the porn chick, in which case we can easily go back to blaming "bush."

Are you familiar with the term "Brazilian"?

Posted

The only thing Andrew Breitbart is "guilty" of is being an attention hog. But according to pBills, that makes his motives "not clean."

 

Got that?

 

NOT whether or not what he or his 'big" sites reports is true....but what his 'motives' are.

 

By the way, you idiot....Breitbart himself has ADMITTED what his "motives" are. All you need to do is take a peek at the COVER of his !@#$ing book....you dont even have to crack it open.

 

 

Do you know for certain that they are? I mean come on, he was doing this to protect his marriage? Really? Yeah and his new book ".... Excuse Me While I Save the World" yes, good ol' Andy can save us all. :thumbsup:

×
×
  • Create New...