Turbosrrgood Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 The Bills made the right choice here, there is no question that Dareus is more built for the Bills and a 3-4, with Fairley built for a 4-3. Plus the Bills definitely needed size and run stopping power. No question Dareus is better in both categories, and in my opinion is simply better overall. I did really like Fairley though, loved watching him in college. I was happy to see him go the Lions, a Suh/Fairley combination is just downright scary. If he shows half the ability he did in college, that line will be unblockable. LB's on that team must be licking their chops... Dareus best 3-4 lineman Fairley best pure 4-3 lineman
Ozymandius Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 also, Dareus had been outstanding for two seasons, fairley only one
John from Riverside Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 Warren Sapp seemed to think it was a no brainer
The Wiz Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 The real important question is do we get a new Bills Show. Marcell's Mailbag!
BEAST MODE BABY! Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 Warren Sapp seemed to think it was a no brainer Yeah. Sapp did NOT like Fairly at all. Said he didn't use his hands.
Turbosrrgood Posted May 4, 2011 Author Posted May 4, 2011 (edited) Yeah. Sapp did NOT like Fairly at all. Said he didn't use his hands. Thats actually pretty interesting, I wonder if Fairley ends up struggling against much stronger and more skilled O-linesmen in the NFL. I think his great quickness and strength, along with attacking instincts will still allow him to succeed, especially next to Suh though. Dareus really seems to have ALL the tools, the pressure is on to produce...The Bills have to get it right one of these times...right? Edited May 4, 2011 by Turbosrrgood
Recommended Posts