truth on hold Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 I'll get back to you when they use both VC-25A's in a !@#$ing special forces raid. "Even well-maintained equipment breaks." ,,, no mention of it being raid related. Called out again ... lol what a maroon!!
DC Tom Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 "Even well-maintained equipment breaks." ,,, no mention of it being raid related. Called out again ... lol what a maroon!! Do you own a car? A can opener? Anything mechanical? Because you're obviously not living in anything remotely approaching reality. Guess what: **** BREAKS. All the time. Particularly aircraft. Even VC-25s - it's why they have a spare.
Buftex Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 (edited) I'll get back to you when they use both VC-25A's in a !@#$ing special forces raid. Could it be this? http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/03/binladen-helicopter-idUSN0312515020110503 "The accident was not unusual, military experts said. Dozens of U.S. helicopters have crashed or been shot down in Afghanistan and Iraq, challenged by sandstorms and high temperatures that reduce the lifting capability of aircraft powered by rotors. In mountainous Afghanistan, there is the added challenge of flying at high altitudes." Edited May 4, 2011 by Buftex
DC Tom Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 Could it be this? http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/03/binladen-helicopter-idUSN0312515020110503 "The accident was not unusual, military experts said. Dozens of U.S. helicopters have crashed or been shot down in Afghanistan and Iraq, challenged by sandstorms and high temperatures that reduce the lifting capability of aircraft powered by rotors. In mountainous Afghanistan, there is the added challenge of flying at high altitudes." I would have thought they'd use something bigger than Blackhawks. They're also known as "Crash Hawks"...for a reason. But no...that couldn't be it. It's an administration coverup so the people don't know the truth about 9/11...
truth on hold Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 (edited) Lol bogus reference to something I never said. Well what to expect from a clown claimed he'd run me off the board. What was that few months ago. Lol .... How's that working out!!? Edited May 4, 2011 by Joe_the_6_pack
Booster4324 Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 Lol bogus reference to something I never said. Well what to expect from a clown claimed he'd run me off the board. What was that few months ago. Lol .... How's that working out!!? Sadly, not so well. Way to go Tom.
Chef Jim Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 Sadly, not so well. Way to go Tom. Easy, easy. Think of all the missed future entertainment had Tom been successful.
Doc Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 Why cover-up the reason the chopper went down? If it was mechanical failure, BFD. No SEAL was lost and they still got UBL. If it was shot down, the SEALS were justified in using deadly force. And now the word is that UBL was unarmed...but reaching for a weapon. Again, who cares? It was a kill or be killed mission.
Jim in Anchorage Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 Could it be this? http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/03/binladen-helicopter-idUSN0312515020110503 "The accident was not unusual, military experts said. Dozens of U.S. helicopters have crashed or been shot down in Afghanistan and Iraq, challenged by sandstorms and high temperatures that reduce the lifting capability of aircraft powered by rotors. In mountainous Afghanistan, there is the added challenge of flying at high altitudes." When one of the helicopters ran into problems -- including temperatures that were 17 degrees higher than expected -- and had to land abruptly, Just for that one helicopter? Pilot error all the way. Did he plan his control inputs on a weather report or the encountered conditions?
truth on hold Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 (edited) Yeap pilot error. The next fishy smell on the agenda is why they won't release OBL's photo. Obamas saying it's because he's not a trophy when in fact that's exactly how he's been treating it. Real reason I'm guessig is photos will show him to have been shot excessively in the head and chest. Think sonny in the godfather. This causes problems because its become clear he was unarmed (which in itself contradicts initial reports). Edited May 4, 2011 by Joe_the_6_pack
Jim in Anchorage Posted May 5, 2011 Posted May 5, 2011 Yeap pilot error. The next fishy smell on the agenda is why they won't release OBL's photo. Obamas saying it's because he's not a trophy when in fact that's exactly how he's been treating it. Real reason I'm guessig is photos will show him to have been shot excessively in the head and chest. Think sonny in the godfather. This causes problems because its become clear he was unarmed (which in itself contradicts initial reports). So? The photos of Uday and Qusay where more mortician's wax then flesh and blood. 3 hour DNA analysis, a quick dump at sea that didn't follow Muslim practice anyway. To many questions, show the photos for what there worth.
truth on hold Posted May 5, 2011 Posted May 5, 2011 (edited) But they've said it wasnt an assasination and if OBL surrended they were required to accept it. But of course it was an assassination. An unarmed man shot 40 times would support that. Edited May 5, 2011 by Joe_the_6_pack
Chef Jim Posted May 5, 2011 Posted May 5, 2011 But of course it was an assassination. Good. Or was it an enemy soldier killed on the field of battle?
outsidethebox Posted May 5, 2011 Posted May 5, 2011 Before someone bites my head off, can some one answer my question how did they get a positive DNA match so fast? This is not an attempt at any conspiracy theory, just curious. Thanks.
Bronc24 Posted May 5, 2011 Posted May 5, 2011 But they've said it wasnt an assasination and if OBL surrended they were required to accept it. But of course it was an assassination. An unarmed man shot 40 times would support that. youtube.com/watch?v=yrv1roq_gBw Why does every occurrence spiral into a conspiracy for you? You have this "show me, show me" attitude that anyone with the power to "show you" doesn't give two s#its about. I doubt anyone in senior admin is saying, "Hey, we'd better release that photo, otherwise that moron on TBD will think we're lying."
Taro T Posted May 5, 2011 Posted May 5, 2011 Good. Or was it an enemy soldier killed on the field of battle? It was a home owner offed in a home invasion. Such a shame he wasn't using Brinks or ADT.
Chef Jim Posted May 5, 2011 Posted May 5, 2011 Before someone bites my head off, can some one answer my question how did they get a positive DNA match so fast? This is not an attempt at any conspiracy theory, just curious. Thanks. Well it wasn't really DNA. See Osama married a really dumb woman. When the Seals came to the door and asked for him she turned around and yelled. 'Ooooooossssaaaaaamaaa. Some men to see you.!!" BLAM!!! Yeah, that's him.
outsidethebox Posted May 5, 2011 Posted May 5, 2011 Well it wasn't really DNA. See Osama married a really dumb woman. When the Seals came to the door and asked for him she turned around and yelled. 'Ooooooossssaaaaaamaaa. Some men to see you.!!" BLAM!!! Yeah, that's him. LOL. Makes sense to me. Is it possible to process DNA in less than 24 hours? I didn't think it was. I could be wrong though. I don't really know.
truth on hold Posted May 5, 2011 Posted May 5, 2011 (edited) Why does every occurrence spiral into a conspiracy for you? You have this "show me, show me" attitude that anyone with the power to "show you" doesn't give two s#its about. I doubt anyone in senior admin is saying, "Hey, we'd better release that photo, otherwise that moron on TBD will think we're lying." Hello there, The subject relates to how our government communicates with its citizens. It's a somewhat sophisticated discussion covering what the government thinks people want to hear, how they release information and then how they maneuver to modify the story to fit the scrutiny of logic and emerging information more factual in nature. There's also a "whodunnit" intrique. Ultimately we are seeking the truth for truth's sake, and what that tells us about ourselves as a people. Given the above, for you I'd recommend sticking with Rush Limbaugh. He reduces the world to the simplistic struggle of good conservatves vs bad liberals . Artificial yes, but at least something you can process. Cheers Edited May 5, 2011 by Joe_the_6_pack
Bronc24 Posted May 5, 2011 Posted May 5, 2011 Hello there, The subject relates to how our government communicates with its citizens versus what really happened. It's a somewhat sophisticated discussion covering what the government thinks people want to hear, how they release information and then how they maneuver to modify the story to fit the scrutiny of logic and emerging information more factual in nature. Ultimately we are seeking the truth for truth's sake, and what that tells us about ourselves as a people. Given the above, for you I'd recommend sticking with Rush Limbaugh, who reduces the world to the simplistic struggle of good conservatves vs bad liberals. Artificial yes, but at least something you can process. Cheers Here's a truth....you're an idiot. There. Now you know what you are as a people.
Recommended Posts