LGB Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 Buddy Nix says he does not think the Bills’ have as many needs as most think. What?!? A perennial sub-500 team under Dick Jauron that regressed the last couple of years does not have many needs? Is Buddy Nix looking at the same Bills record or body of work that “most” everyone else is? Year - W - L 2005 - 5 - 11 2006 - 7 - 9 2007 - 7 - 9 2008 - 7 - 9 2009 - 6 - 10 2010 - 4 - 12 C’mon Buddy, we all know that hope springs eternal, but this is a team that competes in the AFC East, not the NFC West. In this division, you need about 7 more wins a year to just compete for a wild card and until you can put a team on the field that has a clue about stopping Tom Brady and the Patriots, you had better take the blinders off and see what “most” of us are seeing: New England owns Buffalo and with New England's six draft picks in the first three rounds this year, I doubt that they are going to get any weaker. Optimism is fine, but the proof is in the win/lost column and it would seem that the Bills have a lot to prove.
eball Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 I think you're getting a little too worked up over that statement. Buddy didn't say "we have no holes" -- he said "we have fewer holes." Why make a big deal out of that?
Dorkington Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 (edited) Actually, I agree with him. We have a lot of average players, and no depth in some areas. We have lost a few close games the last couple years, and have had pretty difficult schedules. Does this mean we are a great team? No. But if we add a couple good players at key positions, we'll be pretty good. Instead of needing a complete team replacement. Example.... Let's say Darius and Merriman work out for us. All of a sudden we stop the run better and get to the QB more often. Which helps out our already ok secondary. We aren't playing from behind as often, so Fitzpatrick can take a few less chances. Our OL continues to solidify (it did OK last year), CJ "gets it" in his second year, Easley, the Nelsons, and Parrish play to their potentials... we have a decent offense. Etc.. See how all of a sudden we become a better team without a bunch of changes? Obviously this isn't a guarantee of success, but imo, it's easy to see that we aren't too far away. It's just a matter of people playing to their potential, staying healthy, and having depth when injuries do happen. Edited April 29, 2011 by Dorkington
Typical TBD Guy Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 I see the Bills as having 3 glaring holes at RT, OLB, and ILB. I hope Nix agrees with me. The good news is that there is still plenty of talent left to find starters at each of these positions.
Chandler#81 Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 Actually, I agree with him. We have a lot of average players, and no depth in some areas. We have lost a few close games the last couple years, and have had pretty difficult schedules. Does this mean we are a great team? No. But if we add a couple good players at key positions, we'll be pretty good. Instead of needing a complete team replacement. Example.... Let's say Darius and Merriman work out for us. All of a sudden we stop the run better and get to the QB more often. Which helps out our already ok secondary. We aren't playing from behind as often, so Fitzpatrick can take a few less chances. Our OL continues to solidify (it did OK last year), CJ "gets it" in his second year, Easley, the Nelsons, and Parrish play to their potentials... we have a decent offense. Etc.. See how all of a sudden we become a better team without a bunch of changes? Obviously this isn't a guarantee of success, but imo, it's easy to see that we aren't too far away. It's just a matter of people playing to their potential, staying healthy, and having depth when injuries do happen. Healthy being the operative word here.
LGB Posted April 29, 2011 Author Posted April 29, 2011 I think you're getting a little too worked up over that statement. Buddy didn't say "we have no holes" -- he said "we have fewer holes." Why make a big deal out of that? I just hope that the Bills improve on their 4-12 record from last year since the Bills have been turning their coaching staff over every three years, Chan Gailey could already be a third of his way to another coaching carousel exit if there isn’t great improvement this year. Who knows, maybe this will be the year for John McCargo, Aaron Maybin and Kris Kelsey to all go to the Pro Bowl. We can only hope.
BobChalmers Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 I see the Bills as having 3 glaring holes at RT, OLB, and ILB. I hope Nix agrees with me. The good news is that there is still plenty of talent left to find starters at each of these positions. TE more than ORT and maybe even more that OLB if Merriman and Moats work out.
Dorkington Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 Healthy being the operative word here. Very much agreed. I think we have a solid "base" to work from, just add a few pieces, and we can start moving up... But likely is, we'll get injuries, players will under perform, and we'll go through the same dance next year.
robertpaul49 Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 I think you have to take it from two perspectives. I think the Bills have more talent that the media types give them credit for since the Bills are a small market team. For example, how many times have we heard about left tackle and quarterback being the Bills biggest needs. On the other hand, I think the fans on this board can be overly critical of the team. For example, how many Bills fans do not believe Whitner even deserves a spot of the team?
mrags Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 (edited) Actually, I agree with him. We have a lot of average players, and no depth in some areas. We have lost a few close games the last couple years, and have had pretty difficult schedules. Does this mean we are a great team? No. But if we add a couple good players at key positions, we'll be pretty good. Instead of needing a complete team replacement. Example.... Let's say Darius and Merriman work out for us. All of a sudden we stop the run better and get to the QB more often. Which helps out our already ok secondary. We aren't playing from behind as often, so Fitzpatrick can take a few less chances. Our OL continues to solidify (it did OK last year), CJ "gets it" in his second year, Easley, the Nelsons, and Parrish play to their potentials... we have a decent offense. Etc.. See how all of a sudden we become a better team without a bunch of changes? Obviously this isn't a guarantee of success, but imo, it's easy to see that we aren't too far away. It's just a matter of people playing to their potential, staying healthy, and having depth when injuries do happen. I agree. Great reply post. We have too many guys that COULD be really good players IF things just come into place. Batten Spiller Moats Merriman Bell Easley Nelson Jones Maybin (I know. I thought this would make everyone lol, but truth is he COULD still be good enough at least to play) Troupe Carrington Coleman Even Johnson because we don't know if what were getting is what he did last year or if he only scratched the surface of his potential. Many what if's on this team. But if even 50% of them contribute on a regular basis were already miles ahead of where we were last year. Just saying Edited April 29, 2011 by mrags
Sisyphean Bills Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 I was really thinking he'd come out and say he did a poor job so far and his team is regressing like a runaway train. OK, maybe not.
SouthernMan Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 (edited) I agree. Great reply post. We have too many guys that COULD be really good players IF things just come into place. Batten Spiller Moats Merriman Bell Easley Nelson Jones Maybin (I know. I thought this would make everyone lol, but truth is he COULD still be good enough at least to play) Troupe Carrington Coleman Even Johnson because we don't know if what were getting is what he did last year or if he only scratched the surface of his potential. Many what if's on this team. But if even 50% of them contribute on a regular basis were already miles ahead of where we were last year. Just saying You lost all credibility when you threw Maybin's name into the mix. I have a better chance at performing autofellatio than Maybin has of making the 2011 roster. Edited April 29, 2011 by DML2005
Sisyphean Bills Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 You lost all credibility when you threw Maybin's name into the mix. I have a better chance at performing autofellatio than Maybin has of making the 2011 roster. Ahem. Are you a contortionist? Just wondering.
bladiebla Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 He's right, we need one thing, nothing else... The Lombardy Thropy!
LGB Posted April 29, 2011 Author Posted April 29, 2011 I think you have to take it from two perspectives. I think the Bills have more talent that the media types give them credit for since the Bills are a small market team. For example, how many times have we heard about left tackle and quarterback being the Bills biggest needs. On the other hand, I think the fans on this board can be overly critical of the team. For example, how many Bills fans do not believe Whitner even deserves a spot of the team? There are a few examples that don't make sense in terms of players drafted high that do not perform as expected (or don't even see the playing field like Maybin and McCargo), but other players are just plain overpaid for how they produce (e.g. Lee Evans). Add to that injuries that occur and it makes being competitive with a chance for the playoffs pretty difficult.
SouthernMan Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 Ahem. Are you a contortionist? Just wondering. Hell no - that's the point! Maybin has as much chance (zero%) of making the team as I have humming on my hambone. Which, BTW, I wouldn't even if I could - not that there's anything wrong with it.
Recommended Posts