truth on hold Posted April 28, 2011 Posted April 28, 2011 I'll say Mark Ingram. His 40 time was very disappointing. Teams want speed at running back, and he doesn't have it. Teams most in need of RB are Fins and Pats. Fins need someone who can run wildcat, and Imgrams small hands and lack of speed eliminates him. Pats last took RB in Rd1 with Laurence Maroney. That was a sour experience and I'm expecting a guy like Bellichek has a long memory. All in all this is a terrible year for RBs, teams realizing this will fatten up where it's rich .. DL, QB*, WR, OL, CB * Pundits view, not mine
BuffaloBill Posted April 28, 2011 Posted April 28, 2011 Me .... my 40 time is unreal ... 4.15 ..... days
NoSaint Posted April 28, 2011 Posted April 28, 2011 I'll say Mark Ingram. His 40 time was very disappointing. Teams want speed at running back, and he doesn't have it. Teams most in need of RB are Fins and Pats. Fins need someone who can run wildcat, and Imgrams small hands and lack of speed eliminates him. Pats last took RB in Rd1 with Laurence Maroney. That was a sour experience and I'm expecting a guy like Bellichek has a long memory. All in all this is a terrible year for RBs, teams realizing this will fatten up where it's rich .. DL, QB*, WR, OL, CB * Pundits view, not mine Saints say they want him at 24
truth on hold Posted April 28, 2011 Author Posted April 28, 2011 (edited) Saints say they want him at 24 what if a DE like Bowers or Quinn is there? Or even Wilkerson? How can a blitz-only defense who pass rush disappointed last year take Ingram over them? Edited April 28, 2011 by Joe_the_6_pack
purple haze Posted April 28, 2011 Posted April 28, 2011 (edited) I'll say Mark Ingram. His 40 time was very disappointing. Teams want speed at running back, and he doesn't have it. Teams most in need of RB are Fins and Pats. Fins need someone who can run wildcat, and Imgrams small hands and lack of speed eliminates him. Pats last took RB in Rd1 with Laurence Maroney. That was a sour experience and I'm expecting a guy like Bellichek has a long memory. All in all this is a terrible year for RBs, teams realizing this will fatten up where it's rich .. DL, QB*, WR, OL, CB * Pundits view, not mine I believe Ingram winds up in New Orleans. And Ryan Williams and Mikel LeShoure could be really good backs. Taiwan Jones as well. Edited April 28, 2011 by purple haze
It's in My Blood Posted April 28, 2011 Posted April 28, 2011 I'll say Mark Ingram. His 40 time was very disappointing. Teams want speed at running back, and he doesn't have it. Teams most in need of RB are Fins and Pats. Fins need someone who can run wildcat, and Imgrams small hands and lack of speed eliminates him. Pats last took RB in Rd1 with Laurence Maroney. That was a sour experience and I'm expecting a guy like Bellichek has a long memory. All in all this is a terrible year for RBs, teams realizing this will fatten up where it's rich .. DL, QB*, WR, OL, CB * Pundits view, not mine Biggest surprise to me would be Carimi falling out of round 1
The Cincinnati Kid Posted April 28, 2011 Posted April 28, 2011 Cam Newton...it could happen...Clausen was a sure fire First Rounder according to the Media as was Brohm. I dunno if it will, he might be off the board in less than 45 minutes, but he might be there tomorrow.
spartacus Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 Cam Newton...it could happen...Clausen was a sure fire First Rounder according to the Media as was Brohm. I dunno if it will, he might be off the board in less than 45 minutes, but he might be there tomorrow. nice call
Hapless Bills Fan Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 Cam Newton...it could happen...Clausen was a sure fire First Rounder according to the Media as was Brohm. I dunno if it will, he might be off the board in less than 4.5 minutes, but he might be there tomorrow. Fixed
gobillies Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 how come bowers isn't off the board? he was a top 10 pick up until the last couple weeks. that wouldn't be a bad pick either at 34.
Sisyphean Bills Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 how come bowers isn't off the board? he was a top 10 pick up until the last couple weeks. that wouldn't be a bad pick either at 34. Maybe because his knee has no cartilage?
gobillies Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 Maybe because his knee has no cartilage? worse than when mcgahee came out?
Sisyphean Bills Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 worse than when mcgahee came out? I have no idea. The McGahee pick really worked out. I see your point. (Just kidding with you.)
Pete Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 degenerate knee and microfracture which eventually will need surgery and is possible career ender. He is off a few teams boards
truth on hold Posted April 29, 2011 Author Posted April 29, 2011 No thanks. We are full up on dline and his knee sounds awful
Recommended Posts