Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

JT and MM < 0

 

JT x MM would be greater than 0 then because a negative multiplied by a negative is a positive. For instance, if JT was a -2 and MM was a -7, combined they would be a 14. That's a pretty good crew right there. Maybe you just need to give them another chance?

Posted

I'll never complain about Theisman and Millen losing work, but I thought Mayock was absolutely horrible in the playoff game he called.

Posted

I'll never complain about Theisman and Millen losing work, but I thought Mayock was absolutely horrible in the playoff game he called.

I felt he did a good job on the Notre Dame games last season.

Posted

Im not as big a Mayock fan as most fans on here are but this is a great move as Theismann and Millen were just brutal add in Papa and it was a weekly snoozefest....Gus would be fine by himself, can make any game between any two teams seem like the biggest game being played

Posted

JT x MM would be greater than 0 then because a negative multiplied by a negative is a positive. For instance, if JT was a -2 and MM was a -7, combined they would be a 14. That's a pretty good crew right there. Maybe you just need to give them another chance?

 

Awesome :) you get a gold sticker for today

Posted (edited)

JT and MM < 0

 

JT x MM would be greater than 0 then because a negative multiplied by a negative is a positive. For instance, if JT was a -2 and MM was a -7, combined they would be a 14. That's a pretty good crew right there. Maybe you just need to give them another chance?

In the case of multiplication you are correct.

 

However in the case of addition (and really Theesman and Millen would never have a synergistic effect…they wouldn't multiply each other), the addition of two negatives equals a negative.

 

So in that sense, Nanker is correct.

Edited by San Jose Bills Fan
×
×
  • Create New...