Dave_In_Norfolk Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 That's the basic Republican position. They want less abortions but once the baby is born they expect him/her to either work hard or starve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 I always thought that politicians SHOULD not let their faith get involved with policy? And this day and age it's not simply work hard, it's work hard for less money and benefits or lose your job and starve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 That's the basic Republican position. No its not, !@#$. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 That's the basic Republican position. They want less abortions but once the baby is born they expect him/her to either work hard or starve. Sounds like you're starving. Good for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 That's the basic Republican position. They want less abortions but once the baby is born they expect him/her to either work hard or starve. What's wrong with "work hard or starve"? You say that as though it's a bad thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UConn James Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 (edited) What's wrong with "work hard or starve"? You say that as though it's a bad thing. You mean this country can't afford to support 100M free riders? Yes we can! WAAAAHHH! (Using Dave logic, that's the basic Democrat position.) Edited April 8, 2011 by UConn James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peace Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 (edited) That the Republicans are holding up this deal over abortion pisses me off to no end. It's done. STFU and fight about abortion another day !@#$s. Edited April 8, 2011 by Peace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 Shut it down for a couple months. No time like the present to start saving money. All the idiots in Congress etc shouldn't get paid either. Including lefty marx in the oval office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 That the Republicans are holding up this deal over abortion pisses me off to no end. It's done. STFU and fight about abortion another day !@#$s. Is is really just about abortion? Or is that Harry Reid speaking out his ass again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peace Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 Is is really just about abortion? Or is that Harry Reid speaking out his ass again? Even that article doesn't answer the question. Reid and others say the sticking points are abortion and EPA regs. Boehner isn't denying that as the sticking points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 Is is really just about abortion? Or is that Harry Reid speaking out his ass again? Isn't that the only way he can communicate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 Hooray, more legislation of "morals" from the small-government Tea-infused right! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 Hooray, more legislation of "morals" from the small-government Tea-infused right! Tea Party Movement: Fiscal Responsibility Limited Government Free Trade No position on social issues. Did you not read about this a little while back? Do you lack reading comprehension skills or you just don't care if you are viewed as a partisan hack? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 Tea Party Movement: Fiscal Responsibility Limited Government Free Trade No position on social issues. Did you not read about this a little while back? Do you lack reading comprehension skills or you just don't care if you are viewed as a partisan hack? Actions speak louder than words, my gullible friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 Actions speak louder than words, my gullible friend. The Tea Party Movement is holding the Republicans feet to the fire over fiscal issues, but demonize them for your own political reasons you partisan hack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 The Tea Party Movement is holding the Republicans feet to the fire over fiscal issues, but demonize them for your own political reasons you partisan hack. If it's all about fiscal issues, why such a strong Christian theme at all the rallies and gatherings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 (edited) My view if you want an abortion, pay for it yourself. Same category as facelifts and tummy tucks. Totally elective (except for ectopic pregnancies). No govt or insurance company $ at all. If Planned Parenthood Abortion gets govt. $ why don't counseling centers? Edited April 8, 2011 by Wacka Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 If it's all about fiscal issues, why such a strong Christian theme at all the rallies and gatherings? The Tea Party Movement has nothing to do with Christianity except by coincidence. Try my link. http://articles.cnn.com/2011-04-06/politics/tea.party.shut.down_1_government-shutdown-spending-cuts-republican-pledge?_s=PM:POLITICS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted April 8, 2011 Share Posted April 8, 2011 Sure the Republicans want to cut and save the taxpayers money as long as it doesn't affect programs they like and it includes their social agenda. Plain and simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts