Nervous Guy Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 Dude, Amy Carter actually got MORE homely as the years went on. I still haven't recovered from the wedding photo I saw in People magazine while waiting for a prescription to be filled. Brutal. 161511[/snapback]
R. Rich Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 Guess you are more of a "Chelsea" guy:http://www.yaleherald.com/archive/xxvii/19...cs/chels229.jpg or.....Amy Carter! http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/holida...styamy-398v.jpg 161478[/snapback] Yeah, that's it. I remember it being written in stone somewhere that you had to find the daughter of a president attractive. Can't put anything past you guys.
BillsSouth Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 I guess the question here is, can she teach anything to anyone? The only thing she´s known for is underage drinking. Being a professor myself, it´s not like you can arrive at a classroom and say anything. When you don´t know what you are doing, people notice pretty fast.
pdh1 Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 Yeah, that's it. I remember it being written in stone somewhere that you had to find the daughter of a president attractive. Can't put anything past you guys. 161522[/snapback] It is the subject of the Post, not carved in stone. Easy there tough guy!
mary owen Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 I guess the question here is, can she teach anything to anyone? The only thing she´s known for is underage drinking. Being a professor myself, it´s not like you can arrive at a classroom and say anything. When you don´t know what you are doing, people notice pretty fast. 161525[/snapback] since when do you have to be "known for something" to be a teacher? she has a degree. Just as I feel she shouldn't get considered for a job because she's the president's daughter, she shouldn't be discriminated against because of it either.
R. Rich Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 It is the subject of the Post, not carved in stone. Easy there tough guy! 161533[/snapback] I just find it amusing that it is ASSumed that if I don't find the Bush girls attractive that I must find the daughters of Democratic presidents attractive, because it's all about the political parties, I guess. It doesn't apply in my case. There is a forum here where it may apply, though...
pdh1 Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 I just find it amusing that it is ASSumed that if I don't find the Bush girls attractive that I must find the daughters of Democratic presidents attractive, because it's all about the political parties, I guess. It doesn't apply in my case. There is a forum here where it may apply, though... 161543[/snapback] HuH? Just looking at women and talking about who is hot and who is not..... Didn't see any mention of political parties here to you just posted.
BuckeyeBill Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 Public school in D.C. I don't know how safe that would be for the daughter of the President. Secret service checks before each class. Right?
R. Rich Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 HuH? Just looking at women and talking about who is hot and who is not.....Didn't see any mention of political parties here to you just posted. 161601[/snapback] It just so happened the two you posted links to were daughters of Democratic presidents as opposed to the topic of the thread, two daughters of a Republican president, eh?
PromoTheRobot Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 She was just offered the presidency at Yale. Go figure. PTR
Alaska Darin Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 She was just offered the presidency at Yale. Go figure. PTR 161632[/snapback] Why? Did they disqualify John Kerry's daughter because her father is a loser?
R. Rich Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 Why? Did they disqualify John Kerry's daughter because her father is a loser? 161633[/snapback] C'mon, man. You're capable of better ones than that.
Alaska Darin Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 C'mon, man. You're capable of better ones than that. 161636[/snapback] Sometimes. There are limitations based on subject.
R. Rich Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 Sometimes. There are limitations based on subject. 161638[/snapback] Well, as Sir Clint of Eastwood always says, "Man's got to know his limitations".
BRH Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 don't laugh...i ran into phil gramm there one night a few years ago...fortunately i had just enough beer in me to wander up and ask him just what he was doing there. it was an interesting converation./.. 161397[/snapback] Was his buddy Dicky Flatt with him?
Guest Guest Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 It just so happened the two you posted links to were daughters of Democratic presidents as opposed to the topic of the thread, two daughters of a Republican president, eh? 161606[/snapback] I can't help if they are ugly! Blame the parents for their crappy genes!
R. Rich Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 I can't help if they are ugly! Blame the parents for their crappy genes! 161771[/snapback] I hear ya. They're all ugly, that's my point. I don't base attraction on someone's political party. Even Gore's daughters and Mondale's slutty daughter aren't all that.
PastaJoe Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 Did they disqualify John Kerry's daughter because her father is a loser? A long-term Senator with a multi-millionaire wife. What a loser.
R. Rich Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 Well, he did lose the last election, PastaJoe. Let people bask in the glory of.....................whatever glory they get out of that.
Recommended Posts