JCBoston Posted August 30, 2004 Posted August 30, 2004 Take it from Eric Moulds in today's News - don't put too much stock in the preseason. However, Moulds recommended caution about reacting to preseason results. He likes what he has seen of the new offensive scheme in practice - something that has not been unveiled in exhibition games. "I think we're just vanilla right now," Moulds said. "We're just running our base plays. We're not game-planning for people. . . . "It's a new offense. We're going to just run basic plays at this point."
ch19079 Posted August 30, 2004 Posted August 30, 2004 i dont put alot of stock in preseason wins, but i do look at INJURIES!!!! i also look to see if recievers can cetch the ball, and if our O-Line can block. those dont change from game to game. WR good, O-Line bad :I starred in Brokeback Mountain:
billsfanone Posted August 30, 2004 Posted August 30, 2004 Vanilla or not, I thought the first team O looked pretty good. Special teams killed us, which I'm confident will get fixed.
R. Rich Posted August 30, 2004 Posted August 30, 2004 This was discussed earlier. Preseason RECORDS mean nothing; preseason TENDENCIES mean a whole lot more. Are guys fumbling the ball, jumping offsides, missing tackles, blowing coverage assignments, etc. becuase it's preseason? If these things do not happen to the same degree they're happening now once the regular season begins, I'll be happy.
Recommended Posts