Bishop Hedd Posted March 30, 2011 Posted March 30, 2011 Don't you understand Jack the Tea Party is a movement...not a party! http://buffalo.ynn.com/content/top_stories/538147/jack-davis-stirs-up-the-tea-party/?ap=1&MP4 Interesting race including Buffalo Beast's own Ian Murphy running on the Green party line. Just as long as the repulsive Jane Corwin doesn't win I'm happy.
Buftex Posted March 31, 2011 Posted March 31, 2011 Don't you understand Jack the Tea Party is a movement...not a party! http://buffalo.ynn.com/content/top_stories/538147/jack-davis-stirs-up-the-tea-party/?ap=1&MP4 Interesting race including Buffalo Beast's own Ian Murphy running on the Green party line. Just as long as the repulsive Jane Corwin doesn't win I'm happy. I have heard that somewhere before....
Gene Frenkle Posted March 31, 2011 Posted March 31, 2011 My two-year-old had a movement today which reminded me of the Tea Party.
Bishop Hedd Posted April 8, 2011 Author Posted April 8, 2011 The teabaggers won't let Ian in. Not surprising since the teabagging movement is pretty much anti-free speech. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42486196
IDBillzFan Posted April 8, 2011 Posted April 8, 2011 The teabaggers won't let Ian in. Not surprising since the teabagging movement is pretty much anti-free speech. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42486196 Anti-free speech. Want children to die. Want old people to starve. Hate black people. That's quite a list you're creating there, Skippy. Keep up the good work. :lol:
RkFast Posted April 8, 2011 Posted April 8, 2011 Anti-free speech. Want children to die. Want old people to starve. Hate black people. Demagogery....what the douchebaggers do best.
IDBillzFan Posted April 8, 2011 Posted April 8, 2011 Demagogery....what the douchebaggers do best. I really love how hard the left is trying to sell the fact that the pending shutdown is exclusively because of the tea party. As if the left's inept, embarrassing inability to produce a budget last year has nothing to do with the situation. And here we have the new mantra from Sebelius: "GOP actions could increase number of abortions!" Since when did anyone on the left care about how many abortions are happening?
LeviF Posted April 8, 2011 Posted April 8, 2011 And here we have the new mantra from Sebelius: "GOP actions could increase number of abortions!" Since when did anyone on the left care about how many abortions are happening? I actually know quite a few Obama-voting liberals who think that an abortion is a disgusting medical procedure and want to minimize the amount of them. They just don't think it should be banned.
Gene Frenkle Posted April 8, 2011 Posted April 8, 2011 I actually know quite a few Obama-voting liberals who think that an abortion is a disgusting medical procedure and want to minimize the amount of them. They just don't think it should be banned. I'm anti-abortion, but I think it is a matter of personal liberty and should not be banned. It represents a definingly hypocritical stance from the right, who claim to be all about small, non-intrusive laws and government.
RkFast Posted April 8, 2011 Posted April 8, 2011 I'm anti-abortion, but I think it is a matter of personal liberty and should not be banned. It represents a definingly hypocritical stance from the right, who claim to be all about small, non-intrusive laws and government. Holy !@#$, we agree on something. The idea that everything that you dont agree with (morally or otherwise) should be illegal is moronic. Cheers!
3rdnlng Posted April 8, 2011 Posted April 8, 2011 Holy !@#$, we agree on something. The idea that everything that you dont agree with (morally or otherwise) should be illegal is moronic. Cheers! I agree with you RkFast, but I'll never agree with Frenkle!
Chef Jim Posted April 8, 2011 Posted April 8, 2011 I agree with you RkFast, but I'll never agree with Frenkle! Dr. Samuel Johnson's right about Olson Johnson being right.
DC Tom Posted April 8, 2011 Posted April 8, 2011 I'm anti-abortion, but I think it is a matter of personal liberty and should not be banned. It represents a definingly hypocritical stance from the right, who claim to be all about small, non-intrusive laws and government. I don't give a **** about abortion, as I've never had one. I'm also pro-choice, as it's not my decision. I also don't see any reason Planned Parenthood should be getting federal support - last I checked, their url ends in .org, not .hhs.gov. And here we have the new mantra from Sebelius: "GOP actions could increase number of abortions!" Since when did anyone on the left care about how many abortions are happening? In 20 years, it's that many fewer people voting Democrat.
3rdnlng Posted April 8, 2011 Posted April 8, 2011 I don't give a **** about abortion, as I've never had one. I'm also pro-choice, as it's not my decision. I also don't see any reason Planned Parenthood should be getting federal support - last I checked, their url ends in .org, not .hhs.gov. In 20 years, it's that many fewer people voting Democrat. Some people might wish that you were involved in one though.
Chef Jim Posted April 8, 2011 Posted April 8, 2011 Some people might wish that you were involved in one though. I think he was but climbed out of the trash bin. Explains a lot I think.
Gene Frenkle Posted April 8, 2011 Posted April 8, 2011 Holy !@#$, we agree on something. The idea that everything that you dont agree with (morally or otherwise) should be illegal is moronic. Cheers! Now if only the rest of the Republican Party could see the light... I agree with you RkFast, but I'll never agree with Frenkle! I think he was but climbed out of the trash bin. Explains a lot I think. One tough son of a B word, that one...
Recommended Posts