KD in CA Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 The "last guy" ... 1. made those behind 911 "not a priority" 2. sent way too few after them, too few to encircle Osama when spotted at Tora Bora 3. flipped off those at war with the "not a priority," proving to every sane and rational life form in the universe that the Decider had no intention of getting the "not a priority," since local cooperation was by far our best shot 4. intentionally lied to sell out our troops in Iraq, creating the greatest ever recruiting class for the "not a priority" behind 911 The endless attempts to re-write W's lies with yet new lies and bigoted distortions is a big attempt to cover for the crime of treason by "the last guy," and until "this guy" commits treason against the US, he is infinitely preferable to the "last guy," who is a traitor, as is everyone defending him... It had to be the case. The concept that the "UN" and the "US" are not "one and the same" is beyond the capability of a sub human to comprehend. US = "us" = US = UN = whatever, just kill Muslims, all of 'em... but not Mubarak, because Israel really likes him... Actually, I was questing the current guy, not commenting on the last guy. But since your Bush Derangement Syndrome drives hysterical rantings at every turn, I can't even tell if you agree or disagree with intervention in Libya. But last time I checked, they weren't being bombed by UN pilots flying UN aircraft. Unless USAF = UN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dexter Posted March 28, 2011 Share Posted March 28, 2011 Actually, I was questing the current guy, not commenting on the last guy. But since your Bush Derangement Syndrome drives hysterical rantings at every turn, I can't even tell if you agree or disagree with intervention in Libya. But last time I checked, they weren't being bombed by UN pilots flying UN aircraft. Unless USAF = UN. This is really a "tough" concept, that the USAF would fight as part of a UN no fly operation, exactly as what happened in Iraq 1991-2003... except sub humans don't understand what the UN is, whether the UN is different from the US, or why the "US media" always calls UN military operations "our, we, America's war... etc..." Iraq in 2003 was W's war since the UN did not approve it, and neither did 115 out of 120 Gulf War allies, not fooled into believing smoking drinking Saddam and Islamic lifestyle Osama were anything but mortal enemies. I have absolutely no problem with the US participating in a UN no fly operation in Libya or anywhere else. I liked the French picking up "their share" of the UN task as well. I have a huge problem with a White House that intentionally lies to start a war with precisely no US national interest, because that is treason. Participating in a UN operation is not starting a war. Invading IRaq in 2003 was... Whenever someone tries to cloak their argument for US intervention with grandiose claims of American "exceptionalism", "struggle between good and evil", "nobility" of US policy, like Murdoch's $20 million a year man does here, you know he's full of s#&@. Remember this is the same guy who demonized Hans Blix for not finding WMDs; O'Reilly, the Irish Catholic, who called the Pope senile for opposing the Iraq war. It is amazing to think anyone still watches all the outed liars on FIXED. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 28, 2011 Author Share Posted March 28, 2011 Last person out... Turn off the lights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted March 28, 2011 Share Posted March 28, 2011 This is really a "tough" concept, that the USAF would fight as part of a UN no fly operation, exactly as what happened in Iraq 1991-2003... except sub humans don't understand what the UN is, whether the UN is different from the US, or why the "US media" always calls UN military operations "our, we, America's war... etc..." Iraq in 2003 was W's war since the UN did not approve it, and neither did 115 out of 120 Gulf War allies, not fooled into believing smoking drinking Saddam and Islamic lifestyle Osama were anything but mortal enemies. I have absolutely no problem with the US participating in a UN no fly operation in Libya or anywhere else. I liked the French picking up "their share" of the UN task as well. I have a huge problem with a White House that intentionally lies to start a war with precisely no US national interest, because that is treason. Participating in a UN operation is not starting a war. Invading IRaq in 2003 was... It is amazing to think anyone still watches all the outed liars on FIXED. You continue to parrot the talking points of your one world government international socialist buddies you pretend to despise. Again, you are either an effective troll, or an overeducated idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dexter Posted March 28, 2011 Share Posted March 28, 2011 You continue to parrot the talking points of your one world government international socialist buddies you pretend to despise. Again, you are either an effective troll, or an overeducated idiot. Where do I push the "one world government?" The one thing the UN is good for is borders and united military action like Desert Storm. As a supporter of Israel, you don't like that, because Israel is the one and only one country on the planet outside its UN borders, and you cheer that, while at the same time try to use "UN violations" to justify the Iraq Treason you and the rest of Israel so love. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts