beausox Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 (edited) It is indisputably true that WMD's were not present in Iraq when Iraq was invaded. It is also true that such disparate stakeholders, from Israeli to Russian to Islamic interests, believed and/or purported to believe that WMD's were present. In short a scenario Oliver Stone would find worthy of film-epic. When they knew that what they thought to be true was in fact not true is when a lie begins. , Edited March 22, 2011 by beausox
Alaska Darin Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 Lead paint chips are not the "Breakfast of Champions".
whateverdude Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 It is indisputably true that WMD's were not present in Iraq when Iraq was invaded. It is also true that such disparate stakeholders, from Israeli to Russian to Islamic interests, believed and/or purported to believe that WMD's were present. In short a scenario Oliver Stone would find worthy of film-epic. When they knew that what they thought to be true was in fact not true is when a lie begins. , Have you ever heard of an intelligence failure.....it happens we are only human and as fair as the lie thing, the burden of proof is with you.
KD in CA Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 It is indisputably true that WMD's were not present in Iraq when Iraq was invaded. How exactly is this "indisputably true"? If I can't find my phone today, does that mean it is 'indisputably true' that it doesn't exist?
truth on hold Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 (edited) It is indisputably true that WMD's were not present in Iraq when Iraq was invaded. It is also true that such disparate stakeholders, from Israeli to Russian to Islamic interests, believed and/or purported to believe that WMD's were present. In short a scenario Oliver Stone would find worthy of film-epic. When they knew that what they thought to be true was in fact not true is when a lie begins. , Yeap, and demonize anyone who didn't see it their way like UN inspector Blix and France. Heck OReilly, supposedly a Roman Catholic, went so far as to allege the Pope was senile, which accounted for his opposition to the invasion. Edited March 22, 2011 by Joe_the_6_pack
Magox Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 We've had some odd characters come out of the woodworks recently.
IDBillzFan Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 We've had some odd characters come out of the woodworks recently. The 1012 election must be nigh. "Okay, boys, time to break out some oldies, but goodies!"
boyst Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 If I can't find my phone today, does that mean it is 'indisputably true' that it doesn't exist? I heard there is a woman in Pennsylvania who might have it...?
DC Tom Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 We've had some odd characters come out of the woodworks recently. All bitching about Bush, neocons, and WMDs. Really, what the !@#$ is going on here?
Dexter Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 (edited) It is absolute treason to keep lying and claim that the treason of lying was not lying. 115 of our Gulf War allies knew right away that every peep that Saddam and Osama were anything but mortal enemies was 100% pure BS. The Niger yellowcake thing was a George Tenet FORGERY. Not only that, but it made NO SENSE from a science perspective, because Saddam already had tons of yellowcake he could not ENRICH because he did not have a CENTRIFUGE. Tenet later tried to lie and say Saddam was trying to get parts for a centrifuge ==== standard aluminum tubing... The "Saddam is training AQ in chem" was a deliberate lie 'boarded out of a non-AQ Gitmo who was later murdered by Tenet's CIA and the tapes of the "interrogations" were destroyed, because they were about manufacturing a lie to sell the Iraq Treason and NOTHING ELSE. And, of course, we must now believe General Hugh Shelton is an "anti-semite treasonous liar" for writing about what happened during a Clinton "National Security (for Israel and just Israel) meeting." Everyone trying to say that the lies used to justify the Iraq Treason were somehow not intentionally fabricated lies is both a liar and a traitor. Edited March 22, 2011 by Dexter
Peace Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 The Niger yellowcake thing was a George Tenet FORGERY. Not only that, but it made NO SENSE from a science perspective, because Saddam already had tons of yellowcake he could not ENRICH because he did not have a CENTRIFUGE. Tenet later tried to lie and say Saddam was trying to get parts for a centrifuge ==== standard aluminum tubing... Unless you're black, you need to revise this ASAP.
Dexter Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 Niger... is a country, moron... http://www.google.com/images?q=niger&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=4Fl&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&prmd=ivnsblm&source=lnms&tbs=isch:1&ei=kNeITf_xBJDPgAep-MG0DQ&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=2&ved=0CBMQ_AUoAQ&biw=1280&bih=600 Good to see that George Will was right, that the public schools' three R's are now Racism, Recycling, and Reproduction...
DC Tom Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 Niger... is a country, moron... http://www.google.com/images?q=niger&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=4Fl&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&prmd=ivnsblm&source=lnms&tbs=isch:1&ei=kNeITf_xBJDPgAep-MG0DQ&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=2&ved=0CBMQ_AUoAQ&biw=1280&bih=600 Good to see that George Will was right, that the public schools' three R's are now Racism, Recycling, and Reproduction... But here, we have to be PC and call it an "African-American African country".
Dexter Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 But here, we have to be PC and call it an "African-American African country". The only thing here against the "PC codes" is...
Rob's House Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 Niger... is a country, moron... http://www.google.com/images?q=niger&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=4Fl&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&prmd=ivnsblm&source=lnms&tbs=isch:1&ei=kNeITf_xBJDPgAep-MG0DQ&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=2&ved=0CBMQ_AUoAQ&biw=1280&bih=600 Good to see that George Will was right, that the public schools' three R's are now Racism, Recycling, and Reproduction... Gotta get up pretty early to get one by you
Gary M Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41609536/ns/world_news-mideast/n_africa/ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/5727868/Saddam-Hussein-lied-about-WMDs-to-protect-Iraq-from-Iran.html
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 It is indisputably true that WMD's were not present in Iraq when Iraq was invaded. It is also true that such disparate stakeholders, from Israeli to Russian to Islamic interests, believed and/or purported to believe that WMD's were present. In short a scenario Oliver Stone would find worthy of film-epic. When they knew that what they thought to be true was in fact not true is when a lie begins. , he who does, is. he who does not, well, who can say?
KD in CA Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 I heard there is a woman in Pennsylvania who might have it...? Uh...she can keep it. But here, we have to be PC and call it an "African-American African country". I thought we were supposed to call it "The N-word country"
Peace Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 Niger... is a country, moron... You did it again you ass%$^&! Maybe you're not really bright but you have now officially been reported. Use"N-word" or something else but that is SUPER offensive.
beausox Posted March 22, 2011 Author Posted March 22, 2011 How exactly is this "indisputably true"? If I can't find my phone today, does that mean it is 'indisputably true' that it doesn't exist? No. You have indisputable .knowledge of your phones existenc. My word choice- indisputable- was based upon the mistaken assumption that even those who professed WMD existed in Iraq have largely recanted.
Recommended Posts