Jump to content

The French vs. the W apologists


Recommended Posts

No, that is 100% accurate, every word.

 

Israel did not want Iran's ally, The Northern Alliance, to take over Afghan and give Iran an ally instead of an enemy on Iran's NE border. Hence, Israel did not want The Northern Alliance to defeat Taliban and Taliban's terror special force Al Qaeda.

 

In the end, the full circle of the Zionist Treason that was W's War on (Exclusively Anti-Israel) Terror was not only to not get those behind 911, but actually to start a war with those trying to off those behind 911 on 911... all to sell out and get that cash and favorable media coverage that went against daddy in 1992...

As an FYI, the more you ignore the Viagra theory, the more it becomes obvious that it is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 147
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Brothers! We are foregathered here to preserve our hallowed culture'n heritage! From intrusions, inclusions and dilutions! Of culluh! Of creed! Of our ol'-time religion!

 

We aim to pull evil up by the root! Before it chokes out the flower of our culture'n heritage! And our women! let's not forget those ladies, y'all, lookin' to us for p'tection! From darkies! From Jews! From Papists! And from all those smart-ass folk say we come descended from the monkeys! That's not my culture'n heritage! And so... we gonna hang us a neegra!

don't think he's said anything to justify all that. while clumsily stated, does anyone here deny the power of the jewish and israeli lobbies in the US and their proven ability to influence foreign policy positions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more you cheer harm and treason against the United States...

Who is cheering that? I just don't think some old bag in front of you in line is treason. Get some prospective on this whole thing. Yes all of the Oy Vey's are annoying but if you were smart you would just DVR the Real Housewives. You wouldn't be in a hurry to get home and you could do stuff like rewind and slow motion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

don't think he's said anything to justify all that. while clumsily stated, does anyone here deny the power of the jewish and israeli lobbies in the US and their proven ability to influence foreign policy positions?

Proof? was Libya going to attack Israel?

Edited by whateverdude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more you cheer harm and treason against the United States...

 

I thought the bigger treason was when the Bills cut those 2 worthless scrubs, King and Geisinger, who are both probably out of the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the bigger treason was when the Bills cut those 2 worthless scrubs, King and Geisinger, who are both probably out of the league.

Rumor has it that on the day they were cut, the Jewish Viagra lady was seen leaving Ralph's luxury box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Proof? was Libya going to attack Israel?

would you not consider foreign aid to be foreign policy? that's the most straightforward example but there are plenty more. for all the deficit hawks, i ask how many years npr could be run on one years aid to israel?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Proof? was Libya going to attack Israel?

 

 

Clearly, there was a difference between Mubarak and Ghadaffi, and that difference was that Israel liked one, but not the other, just ask "conservative" W supporter Abe Foxman...

 

 

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/foxman-egypt-mubarak-muslim/2011/02/13/id/385921

 

 

"Anti-Defamation League National Director Abraham Foxman tells Newsmax that a takeover of the Egyptian government by radical 'Islamists' would be a “disaster” for 'Western' (cough cough) interests"

 

 

 

and that is why FIXED, Palin, and the rest of the W crowd were 100% for keeping Mubarak, but not Ghadaffi, since Foxman isn't a big fan of Ghadaffi...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clearly, there was a difference between Mubarak and Ghadaffi, and that difference was that Israel liked one, but not the other, just ask "conservative" W supporter Abe Foxman...

 

 

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/foxman-egypt-mubarak-muslim/2011/02/13/id/385921

 

 

"Anti-Defamation League National Director Abraham Foxman tells Newsmax that a takeover of the Egyptian government by radical 'Islamists' would be a “disaster” for 'Western' (cough cough) interests"

 

 

 

and that is why FIXED, Palin, and the rest of the W crowd were 100% for keeping Mubarak, but not Ghadaffi, since Foxman isn't a big fan of Ghadaffi...

These people are getting hard to tell apart. Some are "conservatives", some are "liberals". How will we know who they are? Should we have them all wear something to tell who they are? Maybe something we can pin on them. How about tattoos so it is more permanent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These people are getting hard to tell apart. Some are "conservatives", some are "liberals". How will we know who they are? Should we have them all wear something to tell who they are? Maybe something we can pin on them. How about tattoos so it is more permanent?

 

 

 

LOL!!!

 

Our "US media" keeps telling us

 

1. W supporters are "conservative"

2. opponents of W's Iraq Treason are not "conservative"

 

The problem starts there. W wasn't conservative at all. Our "US media" simply lies about it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL!!!

 

Our "US media" keeps telling us

 

1. W supporters are "conservative"

2. opponents of W's Iraq Treason are not "conservative"

 

The problem starts there. W wasn't conservative at all. Our "US media" simply lies about it...

I know. That's why we should put stars on their clothes and give them all star tattoos right? Well, that plus waiting in line for Viagra.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know. That's why we should put stars on their clothes and give them all star tattoos right? Well, that plus waiting in line for Viagra.

 

 

I actually like Robin Williams' idea of having Congress and Senators wear logos of their donors like race car drivers. Certainly, Dems would wear AFSCME logos and Israel's bought seats would wear the star...

 

Hello, tonight, we have a Dem Rep bought and paid for by the teachers unions, and a Republican who is obsessed with selling out anything and everything for the cause of a Greater Israel...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clearly, there was a difference between Mubarak and Ghadaffi, and that difference was that Israel liked one, but not the other, just ask "conservative" W supporter Abe Foxman...

 

 

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/foxman-egypt-mubarak-muslim/2011/02/13/id/385921

 

 

"Anti-Defamation League National Director Abraham Foxman tells Newsmax that a takeover of the Egyptian government by radical 'Islamists' would be a “disaster” for 'Western' (cough cough) interests"

 

 

 

and that is why FIXED, Palin, and the rest of the W crowd were 100% for keeping Mubarak, but not Ghadaffi, since Foxman isn't a big fan of Ghadaffi...

 

There you go again, PARROTING other websites. BAWK!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I missed something here, but WTF does the SR medicare benefit have to do with Israel?

Nothing, for us.

 

But, it does support the conclusion that Dexter lives in Florida and is some low level employee who gets ordered about and abused by elderly Jews all day long.

 

Hope that helps. ( I have this client who loves to end emails this way, and it's irksome, so now I'm doing it to you. )

Edited by OCinBuffalo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or a shotgun.

 

 

 

And there you have it. If you notice all the things Israel has done that harmed the US, you should be shot...

 

 

Kinda like noticing that the "Moses" who went up the mountain looked kinda different than the "Moses" who came down...

 

 

solution = OFF 3500 newly freed Israelites...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...