Jump to content

Sarah Palin defines "unconditional support" for Israel


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

youtube.com/watch?v=uAwVrsa5AuM&feature=feedu

 

 

So you utilize a RUSSIAN news network to promote a view that this is somehow unacceptable? I'm sorry, but Russia has abotu as much credibility as Germany in speaking on isses involving the Jews and Israel.

 

Look, we get it. You think the Palestinian Arabs need a state and that the woulrd would be honkey-dorey if there was one. Prove it. Prove they wouldn't turn around ant attack Israel again. I'll wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you utilize a RUSSIAN news network to promote a view that this is somehow unacceptable? I'm sorry, but Russia has abotu as much credibility as Germany in speaking on isses involving the Jews and Israel.

 

Look, we get it. You think the Palestinian Arabs need a state and that the woulrd would be honkey-dorey if there was one. Prove it. Prove they wouldn't turn around ant attack Israel again. I'll wait.

 

 

If you feel so strongly about defending Isreal and offing Palestinians, go move THERE and SIGN UP.

 

The CIA filed a report on the 67 Israeli theft of land outside Israel's UN defined border, and it documents that Israel was the one who started the attack (with LBJ's blessing, as well as with the arms LBJ sent ISrael which JFK would not), not the BS you and your ilk spew out day after day.

 

https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol49no1/html_files/arab_israeli_war_1.html

 

 

"Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move."

 

 

 

The US has no national interest in helping Israel continue to hold on to land Israel stole at the point of a US gun in 1967.

 

If all you care about is helping Israel do that, then you should move to Israel, and cease spreading lies in the US...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am curious. Clearly, someone above "sould" get a clue and an education...

 

 

The concept that George W Bush was somehow "not left," that W was "conservative," there is precisely no evidence of this. It takes either a serial liar or a sub human to even attempt to claim W was anything but a big liberal spender and the most liberal warmonger since LBJ, and just as sold out to Israel as LBJ.

 

 

And then there is this race card, "anti-semite," which on this board appears to mean

 

 

1. one doesn't think the US exists to serve and fund Israel, and to use the US military to wipe out all of Israel's enemies who had nothing to do with 911

2. General Hugh Shelton's refusal to fly a U2 "low enough and slow enough for Saddam to hit it" to start a war with the US and Iraq in 1998

3. noticing that our CIA report not only clearly identifies Israel as starting the 1967 war, but also LBJ expecting Israel to start it with weapons LBJ gave Israel

4. noticing the truth that George Tenet's record as "US" CIA Director is that he failed to off Osama, failed to stop 911, broke our laws and treaties and lied to the US Senate about WMD right before the 2002 Iraq War resolution vote

5. noticing that after no WMD were found in Iraq by 2005, the ADL gave Tenet its "highest award," including a Shin Bet "you certainly deserve this award"

6. noticing that the captain of the USS Liberty, and just about everyone else except LBJ, believed the attack on the USS Liberty by Israel was deliberate

 

 

 

I could go on. In short, to be "not anti-semitic" here, you have to have your head up your ass, you have to support treason against the US, and you believe that making Osama "not a priority" was holy...

 

 

 

 

Did you vote for Ahmadinejad in 2005 over Rafsanjani?

 

 

Some of your "conservative" Zionist heroes were for Ahmadinejad...

 

 

http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2009/06/rooting-for-ahmadinejad

 

"I am rooting for Ahmadinejad."

 

 

 

Clearly, one has to be "anti-semitic" to notice this. "Conservative" "American-Israeli" Danny Pipes is for Ahmadinejad, which helps to explain why he supports the biggest spending US President since LBJ, that being W, because without W's multiple acts of treason against the US, Rafsanjani wins easily in 2005, and only lost, in a run-off because of

 

1. "axis of evil"

2. endless Iranian media coverage of Iraqi Sunnis blowing up Iraqi Shia mosques while The Decider told the Shias they could not arm themselves to stop it, and told a US Marine General "just kick ass, kill them, kill the bad people." That is when the Shias we "liberated" became "insurgents armed by Iran."

 

 

 

So, yeah, you, W, Danny Pipes and the rest of the "conservatives" who cheered as W socialized senior drugs and outspent Carter with a Dem Congress... you were all necessary for Ahmadinejad to win, just as Zionist "conservatives" who were for CLINTON and W wanted...

 

 

and Iran slipped back from "Islamic democracy" with a moderate two term president to dictatorship, and then the same "conservatives" were for keeping dictator Mubarak in Egypt because Israel liked him, only to later credit W for Mubarak's ouster...

 

LOL!!!

 

 

Zionist Traitors and their sub human Bible Thumping Socialist American Slaves

hey, i like a good gwb bashing as the next liberal, but this is taking it a step -- or 12 million -- over the line.

fruit to the loops.

 

jw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know anyone right of Lybob who considers W a conservative.

He was a conservative, but his agenda had to move towards the middle, when he was President. Otherwise, nothing would get done. Completely unrelated, but anyone who truly thinks he was an idiot should read his book- he was a shrewd politician, who knew how to win.

 

Bush jr. George W Bush, never did anything for Israel except get undressed to his undies and on his knees - "thank you can I have another"

 

 

Bush 41 was the last President to oppose Israel's UN violating settlements... until O.

 

George W Bush was, by far, the worst ever US President precisely because he did things 180 degrees from his dad, with US national interest and spending...

History will be the judge of that

Edited by Adam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey, i like a good gwb bashing as the next liberal, but this is taking it a step -- or 12 million -- over the line.

fruit to the loops.

 

jw

Was the "12 million" figure in reference to something specific, or was it just an arbitrarily chosen large number?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you utilize a RUSSIAN news network to promote a view that this is somehow unacceptable? I'm sorry, but Russia has abotu as much credibility as Germany in speaking on isses involving the Jews and Israel.

 

Look, we get it. You think the Palestinian Arabs need a state and that the woulrd would be honkey-dorey if there was one. Prove it. Prove they wouldn't turn around ant attack Israel again. I'll wait.

 

I just love the way all our new sock puppets use the same exact BS source for their insanity. Thus proving it's one dumbass who doesn't even know how to troll properly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just love the way all our new sock puppets use the same exact BS source for their insanity. Thus proving it's one dumbass who doesn't even know how to troll properly.

As leader of the sock puppets let me add my two cents

 

HAS AIPAC MADE THE FBI THE “FBE,” FEDERAL BUREAU OF ESPIONAGE?

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

AIPAC is a sham. The group has, over the years, destroyed anyone who has tried to have it named what it really is, a dangerous foreign lobby and nest of spies. AIPAC is the most feared organization in Washington and most powerful, above any law. A former employee of AIPAC, Steve Rosen, who AIPAC claims was a spy, more appropriately a “caught” spy, now claims his former employer does nothing but spy.

 

 

link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're not a sock puppet. A "sock puppet" is an alias used by an established poster to appear to be someone else. You're your own special brand of stupid.

I didn't say I was a sock puppet just a leader of sock puppets you paste licking, nose picking, sheep sticking, poster-boy for Cephalic anal impaction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must have missed it before, but I see Parrot Head is citing Daniel !@#$ing Pipes for some reason. I've had occassion to speak face to face with a certain Daniel Pipes and I can tell you first hand the guy is an idiot (although he seems like a really nice guy). I wiped my ass with him (metaphorically speaking of course) in front of a crowd of students and guy had nothing. Couldn't even answer the question. But this is the guy Parrot Head puts up as the voice of a movement. Nice :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

: :lol: I got to admit that's pretty good

 

I don't know who to give credit for it, but it's not a DC Tom original.

 

"When the solid biological waste material intersects the oscillating cooling device," THAT is a DC Tom original. As is "When an eel bites your hand/And you can't get to land/That's a moray..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...