Dexter Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 In the quest of certain "Republicans" to suck up to Israel, Ms. Palin really takes the cake, even more than Huck-a-THUMP. What precisely is "unconditional support" for another country? A: just that, you do whatever that country wants... How does Ms. Palin exemplify this? A: Ms. Palin was for keeping Mubarak since Israel liked him. Now, in Israel raising cash for her run for "US" President, Ms. Palin says she would attack Libya, clearly to cheers from her completely non-American audience. So what was the difference between Egypt and Libya, Ms. Palin? Why support one democratic uprising but not the other in the neighboring country?? UNCONDITIONAL SUPPORT for another country is TREASON Ms. Palin's foreign policy as "US President" would be "whatever Israel wants, period..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 (edited) In the quest of certain "Republicans" to suck up to Israel, Ms. Palin really takes the cake, even more than Huck-a-THUMP. What precisely is "unconditional support" for another country? A: just that, you do whatever that country wants... How does Ms. Palin exemplify this? A: Ms. Palin was for keeping Mubarak since Israel liked him. Now, in Israel raising cash for her run for "US" President, Ms. Palin says she would attack Libya, clearly to cheers from her completely non-American audience. So what was the difference between Egypt and Libya, Ms. Palin? Why support one democratic uprising but not the other in the neighboring country?? UNCONDITIONAL SUPPORT for another country is TREASON Ms. Palin's foreign policy as "US President" would be "whatever Israel wants, period..." lol, and how is that any different than any President since Bush Sr. who tried tying foreign aid to Israel to an end to their West Bank settlements? After the Israel-lobby went bat sh#t and slapped him down, he promptly got in line and backed off. Since then no one dare go near this. We do have a chance though if Rand Paul gets more traction, given he will end foreign aid across the board. Edited March 20, 2011 by Joe_the_6_pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dexter Posted March 20, 2011 Author Share Posted March 20, 2011 (edited) Bush 41 kept our troops out of Iraq in 1992, and for that, the "US media" went hyper for Bill "finish the (Israeli, not our) job in Iraq" Clinton. That was the "lesson" the DECIDER "learned" from 1992, that doing the right thing for the US loses elections, while selling out to ISRAEL gets the money and media coverage needed to win elections, even with someone retarded as the candidate... Bush 41 was a great US President. How he lost in 1992 is a case study of the US having too much influence coming from one very dishonest "ally..." Edited March 20, 2011 by Dexter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
....lybob Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dexter Posted March 20, 2011 Author Share Posted March 20, 2011 A conservative would oppose socializing senior drugs by lying about the cost to the Congress, while a Bible Thumping Socialist W supporter is too stupid to understand what "conservative" really means... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 A conservative would oppose socializing senior drugs by lying about the cost to the Congress, while a Bible Thumping Socialist W supporter is too stupid to understand what "conservative" really means... I don't know anyone right of Lybob who considers W a conservative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 (edited) Bush 41 kept our troops out of Iraq in 1992, and for that, the "US media" went hyper for Bill "finish the (Israeli, not our) job in Iraq" Clinton. That was the "lesson" the DECIDER "learned" from 1992, that doing the right thing for the US loses elections, while selling out to ISRAEL gets the money and media coverage needed to win elections, even with someone retarded as the candidate... Bush 41 was a great US President. How he lost in 1992 is a case study of the US having too much influence coming from one very dishonest "ally..." The pattern is a repeating one: newly elected President tries to do the right thing via-a-vis Israel and the Palestineans, gets slapped down by "the Lobby", becomes unabashed unconditional supporter: - Bush Sr. tried tying aid to ending settlments ...had to back off - Bush Jr. told Ariel Sharon to "get out of Palestine now." Sharon said don't mess me, Israel lobby went bat sh#t, key politicians advised Bush to back off, becomes 1st US President to endorse permanent West Bank settlements and expansion in East Jerusalem - Obama tries to sponsor direct talks between Israel and Palestineans stating, appropriately, Israel should put a halt to west bank settlements. Lobby goes nuts and Joe Lieberman holds Obama's coveted health care bill hostage. Obama backs down and offers Israel absurd deal of billions in weapons and unconditional veto of Palestinean state and anti-settlement initiatives at UN if they'd put settlements on hold for 3 months. Israel wisely rejects because they know they'll get that from US anyway!!! Clinton was such a slick dude he was the only one who could walk the tight rope of trying to make progress on the conflict whilst not drawing the full wrath of the feared Israel lobby. But his middling approach was doomed without any conditions on Israel. Edited March 20, 2011 by Joe_the_6_pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dexter Posted March 20, 2011 Author Share Posted March 20, 2011 (edited) Bush jr. George W Bush, never did anything for Israel except get undressed to his undies and on his knees - "thank you can I have another" Bush 41 was the last President to oppose Israel's UN violating settlements... until O. George W Bush was, by far, the worst ever US President precisely because he did things 180 degrees from his dad, with US national interest and spending... Edited March 20, 2011 by Dexter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 Dexter you sould like the moron who has been stting in front of a local car dealership for TWENTY YEARS with a sandwich sign complaing that they screwed him over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 Look at all the anti-semites coming out now. Notice how they are all to the left. Just like Byrd (KKK)- WV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 Damn Jews. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 What's with PPP lately? Are they posting the minutes of the Iranian council? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 What's with PPP lately? Are they posting the minutes of the Iranian council? I think JtSP posted a link to this site to the other four people who also post at AboveTopSecret.com. Outside chance, though, that it's John Adams !@#$ing with is. Lots of these posters write too well to be as stupid as they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Is this one of those "I gotta love my kids no matter what" threads? Damn liberals!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 I think JtSP posted a link to this site to the other four people who also post at AboveTopSecret.com. Outside chance, though, that it's John Adams !@#$ing with is. Lots of these posters write too well to be as stupid as they are. Whatever happened to JA? Haven't seen him post in a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Whatever happened to JA? Haven't seen him post in a while. Hey gumbadi... Big Habs-Sabres game coming up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Whatever happened to JA? Haven't seen him post in a while. There is good evidence he is now known as "Peace". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Maybe I'll meet him at the Bass Pro Shop in PA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dexter Posted March 21, 2011 Author Share Posted March 21, 2011 (edited) Look at all the anti-semites coming out now. Notice how they are all to the left. Just like Byrd (KKK)- WV. I am curious. Clearly, someone above "sould" get a clue and an education... The concept that George W Bush was somehow "not left," that W was "conservative," there is precisely no evidence of this. It takes either a serial liar or a sub human to even attempt to claim W was anything but a big liberal spender and the most liberal warmonger since LBJ, and just as sold out to Israel as LBJ. And then there is this race card, "anti-semite," which on this board appears to mean 1. one doesn't think the US exists to serve and fund Israel, and to use the US military to wipe out all of Israel's enemies who had nothing to do with 911 2. General Hugh Shelton's refusal to fly a U2 "low enough and slow enough for Saddam to hit it" to start a war with the US and Iraq in 1998 3. noticing that our CIA report not only clearly identifies Israel as starting the 1967 war, but also LBJ expecting Israel to start it with weapons LBJ gave Israel 4. noticing the truth that George Tenet's record as "US" CIA Director is that he failed to off Osama, failed to stop 911, broke our laws and treaties and lied to the US Senate about WMD right before the 2002 Iraq War resolution vote 5. noticing that after no WMD were found in Iraq by 2005, the ADL gave Tenet its "highest award," including a Shin Bet "you certainly deserve this award" 6. noticing that the captain of the USS Liberty, and just about everyone else except LBJ, believed the attack on the USS Liberty by Israel was deliberate I could go on. In short, to be "not anti-semitic" here, you have to have your head up your ass, you have to support treason against the US, and you believe that making Osama "not a priority" was holy... What's with PPP lately? Are they posting the minutes of the Iranian council? Did you vote for Ahmadinejad in 2005 over Rafsanjani? Some of your "conservative" Zionist heroes were for Ahmadinejad... http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2009/06/rooting-for-ahmadinejad "I am rooting for Ahmadinejad." Clearly, one has to be "anti-semitic" to notice this. "Conservative" "American-Israeli" Danny Pipes is for Ahmadinejad, which helps to explain why he supports the biggest spending US President since LBJ, that being W, because without W's multiple acts of treason against the US, Rafsanjani wins easily in 2005, and only lost, in a run-off because of 1. "axis of evil" 2. endless Iranian media coverage of Iraqi Sunnis blowing up Iraqi Shia mosques while The Decider told the Shias they could not arm themselves to stop it, and told a US Marine General "just kick ass, kill them, kill the bad people." That is when the Shias we "liberated" became "insurgents armed by Iran." So, yeah, you, W, Danny Pipes and the rest of the "conservatives" who cheered as W socialized senior drugs and outspent Carter with a Dem Congress... you were all necessary for Ahmadinejad to win, just as Zionist "conservatives" who were for CLINTON and W wanted... and Iran slipped back from "Islamic democracy" with a moderate two term president to dictatorship, and then the same "conservatives" were for keeping dictator Mubarak in Egypt because Israel liked him, only to later credit W for Mubarak's ouster... LOL!!! Zionist Traitors and their sub human Bible Thumping Socialist American Slaves Edited March 21, 2011 by Dexter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Zionist Traitors and their sub human Bible Thumping Socialist American Slaves What really burns me up about this crowd is their incessant perpetuation of this "holocaust" myth. Even if those "concentration" camps were real, they probably wouldn't have been so bad anyway. I used to love camp. When you're so high and mighty as to stick your nose up and free room and board with plenty of exercise and fresh air, I have no use for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts