truth on hold Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 (edited) Obama can go you know what himself as far as Im concerned. We suffered thru 8 yrs of bold faced lies justifying war under Bush, and now he's has sunk to the same level. Ghadafi never directed a comment at civilians that he was going to be "merciless and slaughter" them as Obama keeps using as his punchline. And now he's interjecting "mission creep" by saying regional stability was at stake and this "threatened" America and we had to act. B U L L $ # ! +. We're blowing billions more we have to borrow from China, backing a group of insurgents we know nothing about. This country is in a lot of freaking trouble if it can't elect a single President who doesn't have the balls to stand up to the same special interest groups that pulled Bush's strings. Edited March 27, 2011 by Joe_the_6_pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 Obama can go you know what himself as far as Im concerned. We suffered thru 8 yrs of bold faced lies justifying war under Bush, and now he's has sunk to the same level. Ghadafi never directed a comment at civilians that he was going to be "merciless and slaughter" them as Obama keeps using as his punchline. And now he's interjecting "mission creep" by saying regional stability was at stake and this "threatened" America and we had to act. B U L L $ # ! +. We're blowing billions more we have to borrow from China, backing a group of insurgents we know nothing about. This country is in a lot of freaking trouble if it can't elect a single President who doesn't have the balls to stand up to the same special interest groups that pulled Bush's strings. Who would that be? The Jews? Or the reptoids, im having a hard time keeping track. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 Obama can go you know what himself as far as Im concerned. We suffered thru 8 yrs of bold faced lies justifying war under Bush, and now he's has sunk to the same level. Ghadafi never directed a comment at civilians that he was going to be "merciless and slaughter" them as Obama keeps using as his punchline. And now he's interjecting "mission creep" by saying regional stability was at stake and this "threatened" America and we had to act. B U L L $ # ! +. We're blowing billions more we have to borrow from China, backing a group of insurgents we know nothing about. This country is in a lot of freaking trouble if it can't elect a single President who doesn't have the balls to stand up to the same special interest groups that pulled Bush's strings. I picture you ending up like my 88 year old neighbor. He still works how evil FDR was into any conversation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 Who would that be? The Jews? Or the reptoids, im having a hard time keeping track. The Jewish Reptoids Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted March 28, 2011 Share Posted March 28, 2011 I picture you ending up like my 88 year old neighbor. He still works how evil FDR was into any conversation. Thats cool. OTOH I can't picture you making a balanced, well articulated, non-partisan argument on this topic or any other of a political nature. Who would that be? The Jews? Or the reptoids, im having a hard time keeping track. I can tell keeping up is not exactly a strength of yours, to put it politely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 seriously who are the Libyan rebels? Shouldn't we know? from the "The Audacity of Hope," Obama said the U.S. will lack international legitimacy if it intervenes militarily "without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands." He questioned: "Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur?" Fact Check rips O's speech http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OBAMA_LIBYA_FACT_CHECK?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 Thats cool. OTOH I can't picture you making a balanced, well articulated, non-partisan argument on this topic or any other of a political nature. If that isn't the ganja addressing the boiler as achromatic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 seriously who are the Libyan rebels? Shouldn't we know? "Not Qadaffi." In other news, the "political steering committee" behind the military intervention in Libya (no, not that committee, Sarozsky. No, not that one either, NATO. No, not you, UN) has ddecided that the interventoion will not end until Qadaffi is removed from power...but removing Qadaffi from power is not a goal of the intervention. Seriously? What the bloody !@#$ kind of a plan is that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 "Not Qadaffi." In other news, the "political steering committee" behind the military intervention in Libya (no, not that committee, Sarozsky. No, not that one either, NATO. No, not you, UN) has ddecided that the interventoion will not end until Qadaffi is removed from power...but removing Qadaffi from power is not a goal of the intervention. Seriously? What the bloody !@#$ kind of a plan is that? Like the Taliban wasn't the Soviet Union. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 Like the Taliban wasn't the Soviet Union. What? What does that even mean? On what alien planet in which alternate universe did that bizarre, irrational retort make any sense whatsoever? Seriously...read a !@#$in' book, moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 What? What does that even mean? On what alien planet in which alternate universe did that bizarre, irrational retort make any sense whatsoever? Seriously...read a !@#$in' book, moron. Sometimes he's a little obtuse with his writing style. Maybe if you hecne the italics you'll be able to figure it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 The French are now in full scale warrior mode, and now finally the morons can each french fries, drink French wines, and eat French cheese without going batshit. Where's my cognac? I'm not just pissed at him for that, but for opening up Atlantic drilling offshore, not lifting the Cuban embargo, and free spending into oblivion like the Democrats were accused of before Clinton. He's damn lucky the GOP has no viable candidate and scorns Donald Trump, or he'd lose. War or no war, as a progressive he has made me angry on several occasions. Donald Trump is not a viable candidate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Donald Trump is not a viable candidate. Neither was Barack Obama, and yet here we are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
....lybob Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 What happened to Obama http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6XLE7qZxik&feature=player_embedded I just don't know when he shaved his beard. The new rebel leader lived in Virgina for twenty years 5 miles from Langley Khalifa Hifter was once a top military officer for Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, but after a disastrous military adventure in Chad in the late 1980s, Hifter switched to the anti-Gadhafi opposition. In the early 1990s, he moved to suburban Virginia, where he established a life but maintained ties to anti-Gadhafi groups. Late last week, Hifter was appointed to lead the rebel army, which has been in chaos for weeks. He is the third such leader in less than a month, and rebels interviewed in Libya openly voiced distrust for the most recent leader, Abdel Fatah Younes, who had been at Gadhafi's side until just a month ago. Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/03/26/111109/new-rebel-leader-spent-much-of.html#ixzz1I86zCCnS AJDABIYA, Libya — As word surfaced Wednesday that President Barack Obama had authorized CIA operations in Libya, and that the agency was using clandestine operatives to gather intel for airstrikes, the rebels lost ground and pleaded for heavier bombardment of Moammar Gadhafi's troops.Obama signed the order, known as a presidential "finding," within the last two or three weeks, four government sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. A split has appears to have emerged between the US and Nato over whether they are allowed to arm rebels looking to oust Libyan leader Col Gaddafi. The division emerged following a summit in London, where some 35 countries agreed the dictator's regime had "completely lost legitimacy". Questioned by reporters after the meeting, Foreign Secretary William Hague, who chaired the conference, said arming rebels had not been discussed. Then, his American counterpart Hillary Clinton said it would be "legitimate" under the terms of the UN resolution which has so far allowed the coalition to launch military action against Gaddafi's forces. Libya -- a country sewn together from its tribal history of which there are no less than 140. It is really two countries -- one centered on the capital city Tripoli, the other centered on the eastern city of Benghazi. The two are 480 battle-scarred miles apart from each other as the crow flies. Each city has a number of tribes that control their environs. Gaddafi has his tribe (the Qadhadhfa), and Benghazi is protected by the largest adversarial tribe to Gaddafi known as the Senoussi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 AJDABIYA, Libya — As word surfaced Wednesday that President Barack Obama had authorized CIA operations in Libya, and that the agency was using clandestine operatives to gather intel for airstrikes, [...] Obama signed the order, known as a presidential "finding," within the last two or three weeks, four government sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. Yeah, no ****. Not only is that not a surprise, it's actually half-smart (only half, because it's retarded to give that task to the CIA). But the big question I want to know is: is NATO now commanding CIA assets, too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 AJDABIYA, Libya — As word surfaced Wednesday that President Barack Obama had authorized CIA operations in Libya, and that the agency was using clandestine operatives to gather intel for airstrikes, the rebels lost ground and pleaded for heavier bombardment of Moammar Gadhafi's troops.Obama signed the order, known as a presidential "finding," within the last two or three weeks, four government sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. Boots on the ground Boots on the ground Looking like a fool with those boots on the ground Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted April 3, 2011 Share Posted April 3, 2011 Ivory Coast next? http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_US_IVORY_COAST?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-04-03-07-00-55 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted April 3, 2011 Share Posted April 3, 2011 Ivory Coast next? http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_US_IVORY_COAST?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-04-03-07-00-55 Only if France says so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whateverdude Posted April 3, 2011 Author Share Posted April 3, 2011 Ivory Coast next? http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_US_IVORY_COAST?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-04-03-07-00-55 Don't forget the eastern Congo too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 3, 2011 Share Posted April 3, 2011 Ivory Coast next? http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_US_IVORY_COAST?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-04-03-07-00-55 I don't understand this "Ivory" Coast thing. Shouldn't it be called "Ebony" Coast? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts