Dexter Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 (edited) It is absolutely staggering to think any so-called "American" could still defend Traitor W. W inherited a superpower with a budget surplus. All he had to do, with a "Republican" Congress, was keep spending FLAT as Clinton/Gingrich did, producing strong economy and budget surplus. But W was way too dumb to understand fiscal conservatism. All W understood was how to use his last name to get elected. W was a "compassionate conservative," meaning he was for big government socialism and Bible Thumping. And W knew that W should listen to Rove and just Rove and only Rove... W had gone to AIPAC before November of 2000 and promised to take out Saddam, because the Israel lobby hated his dad for not doing so, and the ISrael lobby was 100% for Clinton in 1992, giving him the most biased media coverage in US history. When 911 hit, W didn't respond rationally at all. The rational US national interest response was to track down and kill those behind 911. But that was the sort of thing W's dad would've done (and why his dad was a GREAT US PResident), and Israel wouldn't like that. W wanted to get re-elected unlike daddy, and that meant selling out anything and everything he could to the Israel Lobby. So W made Osama and Al Qaeda not a priority, sent way too few (12k, barely enough to take and hold Kabul and Khandahar, and nowhere near enough to encircle "not a priority" Osama when spotted at Tora Bora) after the not a priority, and then flipped off those at war on 911 with those behind 911 via the "axis of evil," since Northern Alliance was armed and funded by Iran. Essentially, W deployed our troops to country A(fghan) to fight with ally B (TNA) against enemy C (Taliban/AQ), and then flipped off ally B with our troops still there and the mission not accomplished. The DECIDER was not finished committing treason and harming the US. Lie after obvious lie was dumped on the US public, and particularly the US Senate, about why it was necessary to invade non-Islamic Iraq while screwing up Afghan. Iraq provided our real enemy, Al Qaeda, with its greatest ever recruiting opportunity. The sum total of W's multiple counts of treason pushed Iran to Ahmadinejad. On the domestic side, W socialized senior drugs by lying about the cost, threatening the actuary who did the estimate. W's first response to 911 was to unionized baggage screeners, doubling their cost to the taxpayer. The end result of eight years of Bible Thumping Socialism was a trillion dollar deficit, a depression, and left wing Dems in total control... For Israel, W sold out The FED the TREASURY the Dept of JUSTICE the CIA US military US national interest all to get the money and favorable media coverage that went for Clinton in 1992. For Schwarzkopf, Scowcroft, Bush 41, Robert Novak, Pat Buchanan, Chuck Hagel, Bob Barr, and Larry Eagleburger, they got the bird from W/Rove for explaining to The Decider why lying to invade Iraq in 2003 was a bad idea. There is no defending W from a US perspective, since W was a total disaster in every aspect for the US. For Isreal and Israelis, no sellout was too big, with the final one, the Wall St. Choose 'em Ben Bernanke BAILOUT being the biggest, because in the end.. W cared about what the media was going to say about him, and absolutely nothing else... Edited March 15, 2011 by Dexter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 It is absolutely staggering to think any so-called "American" could still defend Traitor W. W inherited a superpower with a budget surplus. All he had to do, with a "Republican" Congress, was keep spending FLAT as Clinton/Gingrich did, producing strong economy and budget surplus. But W was way too dumb to understand fiscal conservatism. All W understood was how to use his last name to get elected. W was a "compassionate conservative," meaning he was for big government socialism and Bible Thumping. And W knew that W should listen to Rove and just Rove and only Rove... W had gone to AIPAC before November of 2000 and promised to take out Saddam, because the Israel lobby hated his dad for not doing so, and the ISrael lobby was 100% for Clinton in 1992, giving him the most biased media coverage in US history. When 911 hit, W didn't respond rationally at all. The rational US national interest response was to track down and kill those behind 911. But that was the sort of thing W's dad would've done (and why his dad was a GREAT US PResident), and Israel wouldn't like that. W wanted to get re-elected unlike daddy, and that meant selling out anything and everything he could to the Israel Lobby. So W made Osama and Al Qaeda not a priority, sent way too few (12k, barely enough to take and hold Kabul and Khandahar, and nowhere near enough to encircle "not a priority" Osama when spotted at Tora Bora) after the not a priority, and then flipped off those at war on 911 with those behind 911 via the "axis of evil," since Northern Alliance was armed and funded by Iran. Essentially, W deployed our troops to country A(fghan) to fight with ally B (TNA) against enemy C (Taliban/AQ), and then flipped off ally B with our troops still there and the mission not accomplished. The DECIDER was not finished committing treason and harming the US. Lie after obvious lie was dumped on the US public, and particularly the US Senate, about why it was necessary to invade non-Islamic Iraq while screwing up Afghan. Iraq provided our real enemy, Al Qaeda, with its greatest ever recruiting opportunity. The sum total of W's multiple counts of treason pushed Iran to Ahmadinejad. On the domestic side, W socialized senior drugs by lying about the cost, threatening the actuary who did the estimate. W's first response to 911 was to unionized baggage screeners, doubling their cost to the taxpayer. The end result of eight years of Bible Thumping Socialism was a trillion dollar deficit, a depression, and left wing Dems in total control... For Israel, W sold out The FED the TREASURY the Dept of JUSTICE the CIA US military US national interest all to get the money and favorable media coverage that went for Clinton in 1992. For Schwarzkopf, Scowcroft, Bush 41, Robert Novak, Pat Buchanan, Chuck Hagel, Bob Barr, and Larry Eagleburger, they got the bird from W/Rove for explaining to The Decider why lying to invade Iraq in 2003 was a bad idea. There is no defending W from a US perspective, since W was a total disaster in every aspect for the US. For Isreal and Israelis, no sellout was too big, with the final one, the Wall St. Choose 'em Ben Bernanke BAILOUT being the biggest, because in the end.. W cared about what the media was going to say about him, and absolutely nothing else... Wow, off to a cracking start, this one. Put on the brown shirts and adjust your armbands, everybody! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 The thing I really love about these posts is trying to figure out who it really is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 It is absolutely staggering to think any so-called "American" could still defend Traitor W. W inherited a superpower with a budget surplus. All he had to do, with a "Republican" Congress, was keep spending FLAT as Clinton/Gingrich did, producing strong economy and budget surplus. But W was way too dumb to understand fiscal conservatism. All W understood was how to use his last name to get elected. W was a "compassionate conservative," meaning he was for big government socialism and Bible Thumping. And W knew that W should listen to Rove and just Rove and only Rove... W had gone to AIPAC before November of 2000 and promised to take out Saddam, because the Israel lobby hated his dad for not doing so, and the ISrael lobby was 100% for Clinton in 1992, giving him the most biased media coverage in US history. When 911 hit, W didn't respond rationally at all. The rational US national interest response was to track down and kill those behind 911. But that was the sort of thing W's dad would've done (and why his dad was a GREAT US PResident), and Israel wouldn't like that. W wanted to get re-elected unlike daddy, and that meant selling out anything and everything he could to the Israel Lobby. So W made Osama and Al Qaeda not a priority, sent way too few (12k, barely enough to take and hold Kabul and Khandahar, and nowhere near enough to encircle "not a priority" Osama when spotted at Tora Bora) after the not a priority, and then flipped off those at war on 911 with those behind 911 via the "axis of evil," since Northern Alliance was armed and funded by Iran. Essentially, W deployed our troops to country A(fghan) to fight with ally B (TNA) against enemy C (Taliban/AQ), and then flipped off ally B with our troops still there and the mission not accomplished. The DECIDER was not finished committing treason and harming the US. Lie after obvious lie was dumped on the US public, and particularly the US Senate, about why it was necessary to invade non-Islamic Iraq while screwing up Afghan. Iraq provided our real enemy, Al Qaeda, with its greatest ever recruiting opportunity. The sum total of W's multiple counts of treason pushed Iran to Ahmadinejad. On the domestic side, W socialized senior drugs by lying about the cost, threatening the actuary who did the estimate. W's first response to 911 was to unionized baggage screeners, doubling their cost to the taxpayer. The end result of eight years of Bible Thumping Socialism was a trillion dollar deficit, a depression, and left wing Dems in total control... For Israel, W sold out The FED the TREASURY the Dept of JUSTICE the CIA US military US national interest all to get the money and favorable media coverage that went for Clinton in 1992. For Schwarzkopf, Scowcroft, Bush 41, Robert Novak, Pat Buchanan, Chuck Hagel, Bob Barr, and Larry Eagleburger, they got the bird from W/Rove for explaining to The Decider why lying to invade Iraq in 2003 was a bad idea. There is no defending W from a US perspective, since W was a total disaster in every aspect for the US. For Isreal and Israelis, no sellout was too big, with the final one, the Wall St. Choose 'em Ben Bernanke BAILOUT being the biggest, because in the end.. W cared about what the media was going to say about him, and absolutely nothing else... 15 March 2011 Mr. Theodore Dexter Kaczynski c/o ADX Supermax federal Penitentiary Florence, Colorado Dear Ted, Mom told me that they gave you a computer to help pass the time in solitary. Let me know if you get access to the internet. Your loving brother, David Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dexter Posted March 15, 2011 Author Share Posted March 15, 2011 Indeed, the W Treason Supporters cannot dispute any of my post, and hence "forfeit" by name calling instead. W's record is in the books. Whether the DoJ ever tries to prosecute Cheney and Tenet for the 'boardings, all about getting Cheney a lie to take to Meet the Press and claim "Saddam is arming AQ with chem," is up to Eric Holder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 Indeed, the W Treason Supporters cannot dispute any of my post, and hence "forfeit" by name calling instead. W's record is in the books. Whether the DoJ ever tries to prosecute Cheney and Tenet for the 'boardings, all about getting Cheney a lie to take to Meet the Press and claim "Saddam is arming AQ with chem," is up to Eric Holder. We tend not to dispute posts offered by people who appear to be raging conspiracy theorists and just make fun of them instead. So all I have to say is.....Welcome to PPP!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 Indeed, the W Treason Supporters cannot dispute any of my post, and hence "forfeit" by name calling instead. I can't dispute Jabberwocky, either... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dexter Posted March 15, 2011 Author Share Posted March 15, 2011 Translation = as sub human supporters of W's multiple counts of treason against the US, we are too stupid to try to debate you, and hence would rather resort to hiding behind a sheet and tossing insults... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 Dexter, Welcome to the board. We look forward to a continued spirited debate about all the issues of the current political scene. P.S. Please extend all our best to Lyndon LaRouche on a successful 2012 presidential campaign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 Translation = as sub human supporters of W's multiple counts of treason against the US, we are too stupid to try to debate you, and hence would rather resort to hiding behind a sheet and tossing insults... A better translation would be "We're not in the mood to argue with a raging idiot." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dexter Posted March 15, 2011 Author Share Posted March 15, 2011 I can't dispute Jabberwocky, either... You also cannot dispute anything in the topic starting post, or the fact that W and the rest of the Israel/sold out to Israel crowd, the FIXED "W supporters," were all 100% for keeping Mubarak in Egypt, yet there you were staring a lie-a-thon topic designed to somehow justify W's multiple counts of treason by pretending you and the rest of the Israel lobby really were not for keeping Mubarak, but rather for "democracy," which, of course, you weren't... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 You also cannot dispute anything in the topic starting post, or the fact that W and the rest of the Israel/sold out to Israel crowd, the FIXED "W supporters," were all 100% for keeping Mubarak in Egypt, yet there you were staring a lie-a-thon topic designed to somehow justify W's multiple counts of treason by pretending you and the rest of the Israel lobby really were not for keeping Mubarak, but rather for "democracy," which, of course, you weren't... Let me restate, in deference to your obviously limited comprehension: I can't dispute Jabberwocky, either, because it's just as grounded in unreality as you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dexter Posted March 15, 2011 Author Share Posted March 15, 2011 A better translation would be "We're not in the mood to argue with a raging idiot." The best was to refute a "raging idiot" is to actually document a refutation, which you and your cowardly pro-treason fellow W supporters cannot do, because you lack any facts and you have zero patriotism to the United States, and hence celebrate all the harm W did to the United States... Let me restate, in deference to your obviously limited comprehension: I can't dispute Jabberwocky, either, because it's just as grounded in unreality as you are. Translation = you were 100% for keeping Mubarak, and you don't care one bit about democracy or the United States = all you care about is ISRAEL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 When does Dexter start up again? That show is awesome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 Dear Dexter, Thank you for your recent submissions. We regret at this time that we have no personnel available to follow your particular brand of idiocy down whatever rabbit hole you prefer. We urge you, however, not to get discouraged, and to continue submitting as often as possible. P.S. Please tell Keith Olbermann we really, really miss him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 A better translation would be "We're not in the mood to argue with a raging idiot." Oh come on. Ask him how he feels about Dresden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 The best was to refute a "raging idiot" is to actually document a refutation, which you and your cowardly pro-treason fellow W supporters cannot do, because you lack any facts and you have zero patriotism to the United States, and hence celebrate all the harm W did to the United States... Or because you believe in the boogey-man, and it's a waste of time arguing his existence with you. Translation = you were 100% for keeping Mubarak, and you don't care one bit about democracy or the United States = all you care about is ISRAEL. Only because all the damn sand !@#$s are gang rapists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dexter Posted March 15, 2011 Author Share Posted March 15, 2011 Keith Olbermann and you had absolutely no problem with W outspending Jimmy Catta with a Demo Congress, and socializing senior drugs by lying about the cost. I did... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 Dear Dexter, Thank you for your recent submissions. We regret at this time that we have no personnel available to follow your particular brand of idiocy down whatever rabbit hole you prefer. We urge you, however, not to get discouraged, and to continue submitting as often as possible. P.S. Please tell Keith Olbermann we really, really miss him. Two different Lewis Carroll references in one thread. That's got to be some sort of record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dexter Posted March 15, 2011 Author Share Posted March 15, 2011 Or because you believe in the boogey-man, and it's a waste of time arguing his existence with you. Only because all the damn sand !@#$s are gang rapists. wow, we get some actual Israeli-speak from our resident Zionist, who started a topic crediting W for Egypt's democratic uprising, never noticing that he and the rest of W's apologists were 100% for KEEPING THE DICTATOR... Lie a lot, you do... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts