Rockinon Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 (edited) 2. Denver Broncos: Patrick Peterson, CB, LSU. Denver has seen their defensive backs go from one of the best in the NFL, to now finding themselves in need of improvement. Champ Bailey and Brian Dawkins are both passes their prime, and don't have many years left to play at the NFL level. Their other cornerback, Perrish Cox, has found himself in legal troubles. Linky Personally, I think this plays into our hands nicely. Edited February 14, 2011 by Rockinon
Captain Hindsight Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 2. Denver Broncos: Patrick Peterson, CB, LSU. Denver has seen their defensive backs go from one of the best in the NFL, to now finding themselves in need of improvement. Champ Bailey and Brian Dawkins are both passes their prime, and don't have many years left to play at the NFL level. Their other cornerback, Perrish Cox, has found himself in legal troubles. Linky Personally, I think this plays into our hands nicely. How do you figure? Not saying your wrong just wondering what your thinking
BuffaloBillsMagic1 Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 2. Denver Broncos: Patrick Peterson, CB, LSU. Denver has seen their defensive backs go from one of the best in the NFL, to now finding themselves in need of improvement. Champ Bailey and Brian Dawkins are both passes their prime, and don't have many years left to play at the NFL level. Their other cornerback, Perrish Cox, has found himself in legal troubles. Linky Personally, I think this plays into our hands nicely. Let's trade them one of ours for a second rounder as well.
808 Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 they need a whole new D. they switched to the 34 2 years ago and drafted for it and brought in a aging jamal williams. their DBs are old and the younger ones they have are below AVG. the switch back to the 43 will force them to draft for it cause they dont have the pieces for that either. they could go any way on D. and not to mention D.thomas just ruptured his achilles. they are kinda like the bills in the that they could draft about anything.
Rockinon Posted February 14, 2011 Author Posted February 14, 2011 (edited) 2 veteran CBs growing old. Their rookie, Cox may miss some time next year as well. Linky That's a pretty big need and is going to make it hard for them to pass up in the 1st round. They could very well go in a different direction and try to pick a CB in the latter rounds but the odds highly in favor of a round 1 pick. Edited February 14, 2011 by Rockinon
Ghost of Rob Johnson Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Let's trade them one of ours for a second rounder as well. Cause we need one, might as well make it two?
Rockinon Posted February 14, 2011 Author Posted February 14, 2011 Now if we can just get Carolina to pick Cam Newton
Johnny Hammersticks Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 2. Denver Broncos: Patrick Peterson, CB, LSU. Denver has seen their defensive backs go from one of the best in the NFL, to now finding themselves in need of improvement. Champ Bailey and Brian Dawkins are both passes their prime, and don't have many years left to play at the NFL level. Their other cornerback, Perrish Cox, has found himself in legal troubles. Linky Personally, I think this plays into our hands nicely. I actually think this scenario may work against us, that is, if our goal is to trade down in the first round. The overwhelming assumption is that Fairley will go to the Panthers at #1 and Bowers will go to Denver at #2....leaving 2-3 potential "BPA" players that teams might be willing to trade up for (Peterson, Green, & possibly Newton). Denver taking Peterson at #2 just takes one of these players out of the equation. I still would be happy sticking at #3, however, and taking either Dareus or Quinn.
Mr. WEO Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 2. Denver Broncos: Patrick Peterson, CB, LSU. Denver has seen their defensive backs go from one of the best in the NFL, to now finding themselves in need of improvement. Champ Bailey and Brian Dawkins are both passes their prime, and don't have many years left to play at the NFL level. Their other cornerback, Perrish Cox, has found himself in legal troubles. Linky Personally, I think this plays into our hands nicely. Is Peterson better than Bailey in his prime? If not, then what's the point of drafting him--Bailey didn't make that team better when he could play.
Swift Sylvan Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 Is Peterson better than Bailey in his prime? If not, then what's the point of drafting him--Bailey didn't make that team better when he could play. Well I'm sure he made the team better. Just not good enough because of all the pieces missing elsewhere.
Ghost of Rob Johnson Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 Is Peterson better than Bailey in his prime? If not, then what's the point of drafting him--Bailey didn't make that team better when he could play. Is it the same exact team? Is Jake Plummer still playing QB?
Thoner7 Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 correct me if I am wrong, but the highest CB drafted EVER was Terrance Newman at 3. So are we or Denver willing to make Peterson the highest drafted CB ever? Hmmm... Im not.
NewEra Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 Is Peterson better than Bailey in his prime? If not, then what's the point of drafting him--Bailey didn't make that team better when he could play. Just a stupid post
Bill from NYC Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 >>>>>Champ Bailey and Brian Dawkins are both passes their prime<<<<< Well, even if those two are "passes their prime," I doubt that Denver would be stupid enough to squander a #2 selection in a draft on a cornerback. Normally I would not make this assessment on the Bills, but I am thinking that even Mr. Wilson knows that a corner at #3 would serve to destroy this franchise. Honestly, I wouldn't want a corner at #15 if we traded down 12 spots. It would be a stupid move because this is NOT what this franchise needs. We need blocking, front 7, and a franchise qb. We don't have the room for idiotic luxury picks ala Spiller, Whitner, McKelvin, etc. Given the above, I would be the happiest poster on TBD if Denver really is dumb enough to be the first team in NFL History to draft a corner that early.
BillsVet Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 Denver was 31st in the NFL against the run under Josh McD and will probably change over to a 4-3 under John Fox. So I highly doubt they decide to build their football team like Dick Levy did 5 years ago with a bunch of secondary picks.
Bill from NYC Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 Denver was 31st in the NFL against the run under Josh McD and will probably change over to a 4-3 under John Fox. So I highly doubt they decide to build their football team like Dick Levy did 5 years ago with a bunch of secondary picks. Agreed. There is no reason to believe that there is any other franchise that would do something as stupid as our draft in 2006. But again, I cannot even see the Bills doing something as destructive as drafting a defensive back at #3. A receiver? Perhaps under the premise of selling tickets. But even Mr. Wilson would seem incapable of taking a corner at #3 given the state of this team and the dwindling ticket sales. Let's hope!
Captain Hindsight Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 Denver was 31st in the NFL against the run under Josh McD and will probably change over to a 4-3 under John Fox. So I highly doubt they decide to build their football team like Dick Levy did 5 years ago with a bunch of secondary picks. They did hire a man who called Brian St Pierre and thought he gave his team the best chance to win after he had been sitting t home for year. Lets not rule anything out now
NoSaint Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 (edited) They did hire a man who called Brian St Pierre and thought he gave his team the best chance to win after he had been sitting t home for year. Lets not rule anything out now lets be honest, there was a lot of animosity between fox and the front office. it was rumored fox essentially decided he didnt want to play the guys the front office brought in and instead would rather send st peirre to the wolves before he gave the gm a chance to prove his personnel decisions. a whole different problem then talent evaluation if true. one such article http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/19/john-fox-accused-of-mutiny-in-carolina/ Edited February 15, 2011 by NoSaint
boyst Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 lets be honest, there was a lot of animosity between fox and the front office. it was rumored fox essentially decided he didnt want to play the guys the front office brought in and instead would rather send st peirre to the wolves before he gave the gm a chance to prove his personnel decisions. a whole different problem then talent evaluation if true. one such article http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/19/john-fox-accused-of-mutiny-in-carolina/ It was an amazing show down here, the Fox vs. the Panthers series. To the original topic... I think Denver will ignore the need at CB and draft best defensive player on the board - which there are a lot of...I do not think that will be Peterson or Amukarma
Buffalo Barbarian Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 2. Denver Broncos: Patrick Peterson, CB, LSU. Denver has seen their defensive backs go from one of the best in the NFL, to now finding themselves in need of improvement. Champ Bailey and Brian Dawkins are both passes their prime, and don't have many years left to play at the NFL level. Their other cornerback, Perrish Cox, has found himself in legal troubles. Linky Personally, I think this plays into our hands nicely. couldn't agree more, now we wont have to draft the "BPA" and can get our line in order. Now if we can just get Carolina to pick Cam Newton even better :thumbsup:
Recommended Posts