/dev/null Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 And if the enemy of my friend is http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8304654/WikiLeaks-cables-US-agrees-to-tell-Russia-Britains-nuclear-secrets.html#'>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8304654/WikiLeaks-cables-US-agrees-to-tell-Russia-Britains-nuclear-secrets.html# Dude, i'm confused. Screw it. Yes we can! And if the enemy of my friend and the friend of my enemy. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8304654/WikiLeaks-cables-US-agrees-to-tell-Russia-Britains-nuclear-secrets.html# Dude, i'm confused. Screw it. Yes we can! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 And if the enemy of my friend is http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8304654/WikiLeaks-cables-US-agrees-to-tell-Russia-Britains-nuclear-secrets.html# Dude, i'm confused. Screw it. Yes we can! I dunno, but the sub looks super cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 And if the enemy of my friend is http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8304654/WikiLeaks-cables-US-agrees-to-tell-Russia-Britains-nuclear-secrets.html# Dude, i'm confused. Screw it. Yes we can! The Russian request is itself not unreasonable from the standpoint of the treaty. I imagine we made similar demands of them. !@#$ing the British over for that demand, though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 Whose missiles are they anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 Whose missiles are they anyway? England's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RI Bills Fan Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 England's. Nope, They're ours deployed aboard British FBM's under NATO Treaty. They count against our arsenal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whateverdude Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 (edited) Nope, They're ours deployed aboard British FBM's under NATO Treaty. They count against our arsenal. The missiles or the warheads? William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, last year disclosed that “up to 160” warheads are operational at any one time, but did not confirm the number of missiles Edited February 6, 2011 by whateverdude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 Nope, They're ours deployed aboard British FBM's under NATO Treaty. They count against our arsenal. So the Brits have operational control of our missiles with their warheads on their subs? That's !@#$ed up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frit0 Bandit0 Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 (edited) Looks like smoke and mirrors to me ... Clinton privy, used or the initiator of a con to negotiate. I'm sure wiki is not the only one to have those cables, and certainly not before Russia. A real release of GB's sensitive intel, world not be beneficial to us at all, ever. My money is certainly on a hoax with the cables perpetuating it...With the state department knowing of course, Russia can more than certainly intercept them. ...and believing there are more spies and sympathizers in the state dept than anywhere else -imo Edited February 6, 2011 by Frit0 Bandit0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts