/dev/null Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2011/01/07/jk.pelosi.dem.loss.bush.cnn Why it's George W of course! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 "Sweet Nancy was so fancy..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 She keeps briging up her Italian heritage. Shes starting to embarrass Snooki. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 She has no idea how to create jobs. Pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 But Palin is the moran.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 But Palin is the moran.......... They aren't mutually exclusive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 They aren't mutually exclusive. Agreed, but its hard to yell at the neighbor for the garbage on his lawn when your grass is four feet high and full of weeds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 Agreed, but its hard to yell at the neighbor for the garbage on his lawn when your grass is four feet high and full of weeds. The American voters are not the neighbor in this analogy and have every right to complain about both of these morons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 She has no idea how to create jobs. Pathetic. I thought conservatives didn't want the gov't creating jobs, yet you're complaining that she didn't do it. Fortunately the holy grail Bush tax cuts, with the irreplaceable cuts for the wealthy so they'd trickle jobs down on us, have led us through a golden age of job creation. And now the Republicans will really get going with their emphasis on jobs, jobs, jobs. Except they first needed to read through the whole Constitution (which you figure they would know before they ran for office). Oh, and the wholly political vote to repeal the new health care laws, which has no chance of passing, and they don't even tell us what their alternative is, just that they're for increasing the debt (according to the CBO). What, another contradiction, say it ain't so! But remember, it's jobs, jobs, jobs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 I thought conservatives didn't want the gov't creating jobs, yet you're complaining that she didn't do it. Fortunately the holy grail Bush tax cuts, with the irreplaceable cuts for the wealthy so they'd trickle jobs down on us, have led us through a golden age of job creation. And now the Republicans will really get going with their emphasis on jobs, jobs, jobs. Except they first needed to read through the whole Constitution (which you figure they would know before they ran for office). Oh, and the wholly political vote to repeal the new health care laws, which has no chance of passing, and they don't even tell us what their alternative is, just that they're for increasing the debt (according to the CBO). What, another contradiction, say it ain't so! But remember, it's jobs, jobs, jobs! Didn't say I wanted government to create jobs - that's not generally speaking it's responsibility. Creating an atmosphere where economic prosperity can ensue is. And she is clueless on what that entails. If the Bush tax cuts are so cataclysmically horrible and mean death to the economy - then why did the Democrat Congress pass them - they had a strangle hold on power and they voted to pass them - for everybody - even for the wealthy people you so despise. Why are they now suddenly good? Oh, it was just the $700 million that the Dems coveted and planned on stealing from the wealthiest that was in play. As for The Constitution - probably many of the azz jacks that were elected in modernity haven't read it except in sixth grade civics class. You're right about health care though - whatever that is. Our first affirmative action President - President BO will veto any such attempt at repeal that would reach his desk. However, your boy Harry will guarantee that possibility will never take place under his reign. It's BS that "they don't even tell us what their alternative is". The Dems never allowed any of their ideas to get out of committee last year. Not one. Apparently they don't put them in the Huffington Post. Regarding the CBO - I'd like to see the new Congress have them run the numbers again without some of the grossly stupid assumptions that the Dems foisted on them in their ponzi scheme planning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Regarding the CBO - I'd like to see the new Congress have them run the numbers again without some of the grossly stupid assumptions that the Dems foisted on them in their ponzi scheme planning. And they should subtract the ten years of taxes being paid before the coverage starts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts