Greybeard Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 First, the Browns couldn't run the ball. And that meant the Bills could Tee Off on the QB. Next their receivers had a fair amount of dropped passes. Nothing like putting more pressure on your QB. To compensate the QB took risks he should have not taken. Leading to turnovers. Lastly, they managed to get penaltys at the worse possible tiime. And if that doesn't describe the early season Bills, I don't know what does.
Simon Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 I disagree Grey. The Bills were competitive every week(actually they beat the snot out of Jax for 55:00 in the opener), losing very close games over a tough 4game stretch that included NE, Jax, @NYJ and on the West Coast when the Raiders still had Gannon. That Browns team is not only the worst in the NFL, they're not remotely competitive and among the worst I've ever seen. 0-4 was indeed frustrating, but there were still some hints of what the Bills could do.
Guest Guest Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 Their receivers were not dropping balls? The ball was not getting there.
Recommended Posts