akm0404 Posted January 5, 2011 Posted January 5, 2011 On 1/5/2011 at 8:04 PM, Dr. K said: Fortunately, I doubt anyone running the team is reading TBD for advice. Because entertaining various differing ideas and strategies for solving a problem is such a terrible idea.
Fan in Chicago Posted January 5, 2011 Posted January 5, 2011 On 1/5/2011 at 8:00 PM, Van_phelaN1 said: The most successful team in the last 10 years is either the Pats or the Colts. One of them drafted the stud QB, the other built a solid team and fell into an elite QB in the 7th round. I figure the best thing to do now is fix the problems that are huge and upgrade on the QB later, if at all. I still say Fitz should get a fair shake at being the guy through training camp and have a whole season. What is the worst that happens? We are miserable again and we end up drafting a QB. We aren't going to get Luck anyway so why bother reaching with the #3 pick on a guy who is probably only going to be as good (at best) as Fitz was this past year? do you really think Locker/Mallet/Newton are franchise changers? actually the crux of my argument is that Nix and the FO need to first evaluate the candidates and if there is a can't miss QB option, take it. I dont know enough to say one way or the other about any of these QBs.
Nervous Guy Posted January 5, 2011 Posted January 5, 2011 On 1/5/2011 at 8:37 PM, akm0404 said: Because entertaining various differing ideas and strategies for solving a problem is such a terrible idea. Your statement/question cannot be addressed/answered because it depends on incorrect assumptions.
Austin_Bills_Fan Posted January 5, 2011 Posted January 5, 2011 On 1/5/2011 at 2:30 PM, Mr. Negative said: Its time to blow this thing up and start over. There are a lot of players who need to go and Ryan Fitzpatrick is not the answer long term at QB. Sorry but you're wrong. Fitz is our QB for the next 3 to 5 years so you might as well get used to it. We have much bigger problems to dweal with but for once QB is not one of them.
Recommended Posts