High Mark Posted January 3, 2011 Posted January 3, 2011 …which would you prefer Ok this is pure speculation and I would like to get everyone’s opinion on what would be the best way to go *IF* we take a QB in the 1st. According to the Draft Value trade chart it would take our 1st, second, and third to move up to #1. Now I realize Carolina will likely not trade their pick, but a lot of posters use the logic of “We need OL/DL/LB and have Fitz for now so improve those positions don’t draft a QB” and I have to assume some Carolina fans have the same opinion. Luck is clearly the #1 player but if there is a somewhat close second that Carolina thinks they could land at 3 they may be ok with trading down. So what would you rather see if you knew we were going to land a QB like Ralph said we were.
VirginiaMike Posted January 3, 2011 Posted January 3, 2011 If we can't draft Luck at #3 (and we won't be able to -- not even sure he will come out) there is no way we should draft a QB at #3. We need to shore up our defense big time. I saw some posts about us taking the WR from Georgia. If we do that it will be more stupid that the Spiller pick of last year and that's saying something. Fix what is really broken and our defense is shattered into 1000 pieces. WR is not broken nearly as bad.
BillsCelticsAngelsBama Posted January 3, 2011 Posted January 3, 2011 There is no "IF". We have to draft a QB. No present, no future, etc. without a franchise QB. The thought of not drafting is beyond my comprehension.
Recommended Posts