superbills315 Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 well i think today showed how good fitz is and if he gets a good line in front of him maybe he could be great, i feel if fitz played it would have been a different game, anybody else feel the same? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowery4 Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Not so sure, better than BB looked but with the line the way it was playing today it was awfully like the first Jets game this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8-8 Forever? Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Not so sure, better than BB looked but with the line the way it was playing today it was awfully like the first Jets game this year. Glad I missed most of the game. Waste of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Fitz is better by a mile but he is not franchise. We need a Franchise QB to sit behind and be mentored by Fitz. If he had an arm with accuracy he would be the "Guy" but sadly he is not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benderbender Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 I want a franchise offensive line that can give a QB at least 2 full seconds to look downfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodeMonkey Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Not starting Fitz yesterday was a smart move. Our QBs were taking some big hits yesterday and the line was horrible ... even non existent in some cases. Fitz had his confidence shaken in the NE game, no need to pile it on yesterday. He almost certainly is the Bills starter next season no matter who is drafted so let him heal and shake off the one very bad game to get ready for next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hapless Bills Fan Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 well i think today showed how good fitz is and if he gets a good line in front of him maybe he could be great, i feel if fitz played it would have been a different game, anybody else feel the same? According to his presser, Gailey Interestingly enough, Gailey (who watches all the film and all the practice) refers to Fitzpatrick as having accuracy I wonder what he sees (or how he judges) that is different than everyone here who tags Fitz as "inaccurate"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JESSEFEFFER Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 According to his presser, Gailey Interestingly enough, Gailey (who watches all the film and all the practice) refers to Fitzpatrick as having accuracy I wonder what he sees (or how he judges) that is different than everyone here who tags Fitz as "inaccurate"? This hidden part of the game has always intrigued me. The HC knows the play call and if was changed. He knows if a breakdown occurred and who was respoonsible. If a receiver ran the wrong route, missed a sight adjust, or if a protection failure was overcome. I suspect that Fitz has been good at avoiding disaster in the face of multiple breakdowns, made quick reads and gotten rid of the ball to avoid sacks. In short Chan would know every obstacle that was presented and how Fitz handled it. These post game film sessions and the conclusions the coaching staff draws from them are pivotal to building a team but as fans we are lagely ignorant of them. I think that Gailey was honest about Brohm's play. He wasn't errant or careless with the ball nor was unaware of what the plays required. The speed of the game was a couple beats too fast for him and those disastrous plays are the result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts