Chef Jim Posted December 29, 2010 Posted December 29, 2010 discuss Depends. Was the 23 year old listening to the ipod at the time? If so I think the sentence was too severe. He should have gotten an award.
KD in CA Posted December 29, 2010 Posted December 29, 2010 I think he got off light. If the dog had taken a dump on his lawn, than it would have been totally justified. But seriously, if I follow the story accurately, the old man showed his gun and then the dead guy punched him in the face? If you are dumb enough to punch a man in the face who you know is armed, I don't have a major problem with any action that keeps you from further procreating.
BarkLessWagMore Posted December 29, 2010 Posted December 29, 2010 I think he got off light. If the dog had taken a dump on his lawn, than it would have been totally justified. But seriously, if I follow the story accurately, the old man showed his gun and then the dead guy punched him in the face? If you are dumb enough to punch a man in the face who you know is armed, I don't have a major problem with any action that keeps you from further procreating. I didn't read it that way. I think the guy was still alive when he punched him.
Chef Jim Posted December 29, 2010 Posted December 29, 2010 I didn't read it that way. I think the guy was still alive when he punched him. Not for long.
Booster4324 Posted December 30, 2010 Posted December 30, 2010 I didn't read it that way. I think the guy was still alive when he punched him. :lol: Although I agree with what KD meant.
Recommended Posts