Beerball Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 discuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 discuss Depends. Was the 23 year old listening to the ipod at the time? If so I think the sentence was too severe. He should have gotten an award. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 I think he got off light. If the dog had taken a dump on his lawn, than it would have been totally justified. But seriously, if I follow the story accurately, the old man showed his gun and then the dead guy punched him in the face? If you are dumb enough to punch a man in the face who you know is armed, I don't have a major problem with any action that keeps you from further procreating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarkLessWagMore Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 I think he got off light. If the dog had taken a dump on his lawn, than it would have been totally justified. But seriously, if I follow the story accurately, the old man showed his gun and then the dead guy punched him in the face? If you are dumb enough to punch a man in the face who you know is armed, I don't have a major problem with any action that keeps you from further procreating. I didn't read it that way. I think the guy was still alive when he punched him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 I didn't read it that way. I think the guy was still alive when he punched him. Not for long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted December 30, 2010 Share Posted December 30, 2010 I didn't read it that way. I think the guy was still alive when he punched him. :lol: Although I agree with what KD meant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts