Beerball Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 leonidas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Sorry, but it's a little too early for 2011 puff pieces, for me at least. I' m still lamenting at how bad we were in 2010 and how there seems to be little hope for the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1B4IDie Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Sorry, but it's a little too early for 2011 puff pieces, for me at least. I' m still lamenting at how bad we were in 2010 and how there seems to be little hope for the future. What is there to get over? This was a 5-11 team by all accounts. They performed better than expected if anything. I'm glad they encouraged Easely to attend all the meetings. That will go a long way in his development. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San-O Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 What is there to get over? This was a 5-11 team by all accounts. They performed better than expected if anything. I'm glad they encouraged Easely to attend all the meetings. That will go a long way in his development. Cool. Sounds like a well spoken kid. Really looking forward to getting a look at him on the field. I hope he does play Sunday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Hope Easley comes back and can contribute in 2011. It may be hard for him to even get on the field though, especially if we re-sign Roscoe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AxelRipper Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Actually... 5-8-3 is a lot better than the 2-14 that a lot of pundits gave us at the beginning of the year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San-O Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 That's a nice problem to have, I really thought the WR corp would be the weakest on the team, given the Hardy situation and general inexperience of most of the other guys. It probably helps a lot when your QB isn't afraid to throw the ball! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Considering what Chan has done with a bunch of no-name receivers I'm curious to see what Easley brings in 2011. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van_phelaN1 Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Actually... 5-8-3 is a lot better than the 2-14 that a lot of pundits gave us at the beginning of the year 5-8-3??? No no no, we lost those overtime games. They belong in the loss column. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajzepp Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Considering what Chan has done with a bunch of no-name receivers I'm curious to see what Easley brings in 2011. Me too. I don't know why, but I have had a good feeling about this kid since we drafted him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AxelRipper Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 5-8-3??? No no no, we lost those overtime games. They belong in the loss column. In Hockey, an overtime loss gets its own column... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 I had forgotten. We were picked for only two wins weren't we. I think its amazing that right now we have so much potential talent at WR. No wonder Lee is depressed. he teaches all the kids and now they are going to keep the ball away from him. Since we have someone that is actually throwing the ball ..i agree! But it sure makes us a better team. And i wish our mr. Easley becomes all we hoped he could be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts