/dev/null Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/democratic-party/steven-spielberg-advising-nanc.html Look for the Democrats to add more Ewoks and Walkie-Talkies
Nanker Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 Maybe she could just have some more plastic surgery.
Dante Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 Hollywood a outright propaganda arm for Democrats. geeze
Magox Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 Since we're talking about Hollywood, I happen to catch a statement made by Ben Affleck on NPR, to paraphrase he basically said "CEO's make too much money". classic
Nanker Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 Since we're talking about Hollywood, I happen to catch a statement made by Ben Affleck on NPR, to paraphrase he basically said "CEO's make too much money". classic Yes. But he's different, he earns his money and he's worth it.
Booster4324 Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 (edited) Yes. But he's different, he earns his money and he's worth it. As his movies have been pretty profitable, yes. Now I despise when ignorant Hollywood movie types chime in, but this is a guy who made the money. One other point, people love to quote Bob Hope (love him) and the democrats are zombies bit. So I assume that would be out of bounds? Edited December 23, 2010 by Booster4324
Magox Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 As his movies have been pretty profitable, yes. Now I despise when ignorant Hollywood movie types chime in, but this is a guy who made the money. One other point, people love to quote Bob Hope (love him) and the democrats are zombies bit. So I assume that would be out of bounds? I believe you are missing the broader point, no one (at least not me) isn't suggesting that he doesn't "deserve" the money he has made, just that he isn't the best ambassador of "who is deserving of high pay".
Booster4324 Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 I believe you are missing the broader point, no one (at least not me) isn't suggesting that he doesn't "deserve" the money he has made, just that he isn't the best ambassador of "who is deserving of high pay". I wasn't arguing whether he deserved to be an advocate of reduced pay or who is deserving of said pay. Just that he deserved the money he has made.
whateverdude Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 (edited) Didn't Bill Clinton already do this and succeed at it? Gary Marshall comes to mind Edited December 23, 2010 by whateverdude
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 So many Conservatives admit that Rush Limbo, probably the most powerful Conservative in the country, is nothing more than an entertainer, that its hard to deny that politics has, at least to Conservatives, been reduced to celebrity group think. Look at Palin, she's living the life of a rock star by simply repeating simple Conservative platitudes and blathering on on Fox "news"
DC Tom Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 So many Conservatives admit that Rush Limbo, probably the most powerful Conservative in the country, is nothing more than an entertainer, that its hard to deny that politics has, at least to Conservatives, been reduced to celebrity group think. Look at Palin, she's living the life of a rock star by simply repeating simple Conservative platitudes and blathering on on Fox "news" "Yes We Can!"
Nanker Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 I wasn't arguing whether he deserved to be an advocate of reduced pay or who is deserving of said pay. Just that he deserved the money he has made. And CEOs don't. Man, you'd be a blast in a boardroom. Suggest using a Magic 8 Ball to make investment, operational and production decisions do you? Laissez bon temps rouler baby! Laissez bon temps rouler. So many Conservatives admit that Rush Limbo, probably the most powerful Conservative in the country, is nothing more than an entertainer, that its hard to deny that politics has, at least to Conservatives, been reduced to celebrity group think. Look at Palin, she's living the life of a rock star by simply repeating simple Conservative platitudes and blathering on on Fox "news" You hear than on Stewart's show or Colbert's? Maybe Keith Olberman and/or Chris Matthews or Rachel Maddow would agree too.
Magox Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 I wasn't arguing whether he deserved to be an advocate of reduced pay or who is deserving of said pay. Just that he deserved the money he has made. Correct me if I'm wrong, considering you came to his defense in this thread, don't you think that it least implies that you somewhat agree with his stance?
/dev/null Posted December 23, 2010 Author Posted December 23, 2010 Maybe Keith Olberman and/or Chris Matthews or Rachel Maddow would agree too. I feel dirty for coming to Dave's side on this one, but unlike Rush nobody has ever accused Olberman/Matthews/Maddow of being entertaining
Magox Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 I feel dirty for coming to Dave's side on this one, but unlike Rush nobody has ever accused Olberman/Matthews/Maddow of being entertaining That is true Nanker, he got ya there.
Gene Frenkle Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 I feel dirty for coming to Dave's side on this one, but unlike Rush nobody has ever accused Olberman/Matthews/Maddow of being entertaining Blubbering Oxycontin-fueled rants are nothing if not entertaining!
DrFishfinder Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 Maybe she could just have some more plastic surgery. I loved her cameo in The Walking Dead.
3rdnlng Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 Blubbering Oxycontin-fueled rants are nothing if not entertaining! Same schit from you, different day. He's certainly an entertainer and self-promoter, but he's also right on the issues 99.8% of the time. If you had 1/4 of his intelligence you would be, well, the smartest liberal out there.
Gene Frenkle Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 Same schit from you, different day. He's certainly an entertainer and self-promoter, but he's also right on the issues 99.8% of the time. If you had 1/4 of his intelligence you would be, well, the smartest liberal out there. The only thing that amazes me is that you "claim" to only agree with 99.8% of what Rush thinks. Did you run some statistical analysis to come up with your extraordinary .2% disagreement rate?
DC Tom Posted December 23, 2010 Posted December 23, 2010 The only thing that amazes me is that you "claim" to only agree with 99.8% of what Rush thinks. Did you run some statistical analysis to come up with your extraordinary .2% disagreement rate? Maybe he's confusing Rush with Ivory soap.
Recommended Posts