Reason's Greetings

[Adam]

To get away from the back and forth insults, how about I pose this question about the origins of the Big Bang-

 

What if our universe isn't everything and was just part of a greater whole- that solves what could have led to the Big Bang creating the Universe that we exist in. It doesn't solve the problem about how existance itself began. A problem that I find hard to believe will ever be solved. Not definitively, at least.

[Jim in Anchorage]

To get away from the back and forth insults, how about I pose this question about the origins of the Big Bang-

 

What if our universe isn't everything and was just part of a greater whole- that solves what could have led to the Big Bang creating the Universe that we exist in. It doesn't solve the problem about how existance itself began. A problem that I find hard to believe will ever be solved. Not definitively, at least.

There may have been a infinite number of big bangs in the same Universe-a endless cycle of expansion/contraction. We just live in one of them.

As far as if God exists, only the dead know and they ain't talking.

[Magox]

As far as if God exists, only the dead know and they ain't talking.

Oh yes they are, they talk to me all the time... YOu know that mountain you were talking about? yup, up there.

[Jim in Anchorage]

Oh yes they are, they talk to me all the time... Your know that mountain you were talking about? yup, up there.

I guess you weren't kidding about the mushrooms. Do you also go in a smoke hut to meet your ancestors?

[Booster4324]

I guess you weren't kidding about the mushrooms. Do you also go in a smoke hut to meet your ancestors?

 

Is there another way?

[Jim in Anchorage]

Is there another way?

The "visit" my be longer then intended. Don't want to see em that bad, they probably speak bad English. Will wait for the next big bang.

[DC Tom]

To get away from the back and forth insults, how about I pose this question about the origins of the Big Bang-

 

What if our universe isn't everything and was just part of a greater whole- that solves what could have led to the Big Bang creating the Universe that we exist in. It doesn't solve the problem about how existance itself began. A problem that I find hard to believe will ever be solved. Not definitively, at least.

 

THIS is why I consider you people idiots.

 

I already answered this. You shouldn't even have to ask.

[Jim in Anchorage]

THIS is why I consider you people idiots.

 

I already answered this. You shouldn't even have to ask.

You answered the mystery of creation? And here I thought you where just a garden variety egghead

[Adam]

THIS is why I consider you people idiots.

 

I already answered this. You shouldn't even have to ask.

My apologies. I didn't realize you answered somebody's question. I didn't mean to piss in your coffee.

 

I was merely speculating on a topic that I find intriguing.

[Nanker]

To get away from the back and forth insults, how about I pose this question about the origins of the Big Bang-

 

What if our universe isn't everything and was just part of a greater whole- that solves what could have led to the Big Bang creating the Universe that we exist in. It doesn't solve the problem about how existance itself began. A problem that I find hard to believe will ever be solved. Not definitively, at least.

 

Please submit the galactic axial coordinates of the epicenter to NASA and Gene.

[whateverdude]

Just conner's. And Holcomb's Arm's.

 

Really, what's the sense in arguing belief. It's not empirical, it's completely subjective. Arguing about it is like contemplating the color of the inside of a brick.

Faith is a requirement of making choices in life. You first have to have belief and faith in the scientific method and belief that it is the "right" method to explain what is known before you use it or else whats the point.

Edited December 24, 2010 by whateverdude

[DC Tom]

Faith is a requirement of making choices in life. You first have to have belief and faith in the scientific method and belief that it is the "right" method to explain what is known before you use it or else whats the point.

 

I've said that already, too.

 

Do any of you actually read others' posts?

[Booster4324]

I've said that already, too.

 

Do any of you actually read others' posts?

 

Yes, just not yours evidently.

[whateverdude]

I've said that already, too.

 

Do any of you actually read others' posts?

No not really...to tell you the truth Tom, I'm only really interested in what I have to say.

[DC Tom]

No not really...to tell you the truth Tom, I'm only really interested in what I have to say.

 

That makes one of us.

 

 

Still one more than is interested in what I have to say.

[ieatcrayonz]

Ricky Gervais Christmas photo

 

I wonder is anything is on the front of the t-shirt.

[Nanker]

Probably this or this or simply WWRGD?

[Adam]

Well, first you had Tom Breshnahan's offense and there was nothing. Ted Marchibroda arrives and bang! Tons of energy. Problem is that we all know that Marchibroda was the coordinator before Breshnahan. I will have to hypothosize and hypotanuse about this.

Edited December 27, 2010 by Adam

[ieatcrayonz]

I will have to hypothosize and hypotanuse about this.

I think Ricky tried to use a hypotanuse but couldn't find any rope so he used the oven.

[RkFast]

I wish I could nail SE Cupp, but she does a FINE job of nailing Frenkle and his ilk in this piece:

 

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2010/12/29/2010-12-29_the_arrogance_of_the_atheists_they_batter_believers_with_smug_certainty.html