Jump to content

Cost of the census doubled in ten years


Gary M

Recommended Posts

The cost of the door-to-door count of the U.S. population is roughly doubling every 10 years...

 

[...]

 

...the cost of doing the census soared by 62.5 percent

 

So it roughly doubled if you roughly double the actual increase.

 

Nice !@#$ing reporting. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, but come on, a 60% increase when the population only went up 10 percent is a little much don't you think?

 

Depends on why. If half your cost is tracking down people who don't turn in their census forms, and the number of people who don't turn in their census forms doubles...then no, not really. Or if government regulations created in the past ten years means you have to change a whole bunch of stuff all at once (whereas other government organizations spread that cost out over a number of years).

 

I won't judge until know what the source of the stupidity actually is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it roughly doubled if you roughly double the actual increase.

 

Nice !@#$ing reporting. :lol:

 

I think your ire is misdirected at the Fox piece. Fox isn't claiming costs are doubling, it is saying that the GAO report say's so.

 

The report, released this week, warns that if fundamental reforms aren't instituted, the cost of the next census could more than double.

 

"Indeed, the cost of conducting the census has, on average, doubled each decade since 1970, in constant 2010 dollars," the report said. "If that rate of cost escalation continues into 2020, the nation could be facing a $30 billion census."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I thought you were from the US. Good to know they make dunderheads in other countries too.

 

I am from the US, and when I last check more than half of the US was against the Obama healthcare plan, but he forced it through with the "promise" it would lower premiums.

 

My arguement is and always will be that the US government is not effiecient at running anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am from the US, and when I last check more than half of the US was against the Obama healthcare plan, but he forced it through with the "promise" it would lower premiums.

 

My arguement is and always will be that the US government is not effiecient at running anything.

The larger any organization (public or private) becomes, the more inefficient it tends to become.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The larger any organization bureaucracy (public or private) becomes, the more inefficient it tends to become.

 

Fixed.

 

Manufacturing and logistics organizations can achieve economies of scale as they get larger. Bureaucracies, just the opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...