VirginiaMike Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 Guys, I know back before the year started there was alot of discussion on whether the Bills should go after Michael Vick. Most folks were against it not only for moral reasons of what Vick did, but because we weren't sure whether or not he'd ever return to his more productive self. As it has turned out, he is even better than he was in Atlanta. Given that, in looking at what both Vick and Fitzgerald bring to the table I am not convinced that Vick could have performed in Buffalo as well as Fitzy has this year. Although Vick has great escapability, it's his pocket performance and his ability to remain there that is making him great in Philly. For most of the year the Bills really have not had any pocket performance because if the ball isn't out very quickly it's not coming out. Fitzy's strength is his making quick decisions and getting the ball out. Holding the ball in the pocket is not an option in Buffalo. I'm not sure Vick would have done better than Fitzy on the Bills this year. That said, as the team improves Vick would have certainly been a better long term QB solution, but right now I'm happy with Fitz.
muffmonster Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 Guys, I know back before the year started there was alot of discussion on whether the Bills should go after Michael Vick. Most folks were against it not only for moral reasons of what Vick did, but because we weren't sure whether or not he'd ever return to his more productive self. As it has turned out, he is even better than he was in Atlanta. Given that, in looking at what both Vick and Fitzgerald bring to the table I am not convinced that Vick could have performed in Buffalo as well as Fitzy has this year. Although Vick has great escapability, it's his pocket performance and his ability to remain there that is making him great in Philly. For most of the year the Bills really have not had any pocket performance because if the ball isn't out very quickly it's not coming out. Fitzy's strength is his making quick decisions and getting the ball out. Holding the ball in the pocket is not an option in Buffalo. I'm not sure Vick would have done better than Fitzy on the Bills this year. That said, as the team improves Vick would have certainly been a better long term QB solution, but right now I'm happy with Fitz. Â Does anyone know our QBs name? Fitzgerald is a WR for the Cardinals. Fitzgibbons is the QB for Buffalo.
Omar Little Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 I think the QB has been here long enough for people to get his name right.
The Beautiful East Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 Nowpe, shuddent. Herd that Richie Turbo is out on IR?
cjatcreek07 Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 HOW THE F DO PEOPLE NOT KNOW HIS NAME BY NOW!!!!!!! ARE YOU BLEEPING SERIOUS!!!!!DO YOU EVEN WATCH THE GAMES?!
tennesseeboy Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 Duh...vick is rated number 2 in the nfl...Fitzpatrick number 20. Vick's rating is around 105, Fitz around 89. Vick's team is in playoff contention, Fitz is 2 and 9. How can you even think of comparing the two? http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating/year/2010/seasontype/2
bowery4 Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 When Fitz gets old we can call him Fitzgeritol
ReturnoftheBuffaloBeast23 Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 Guys, I know back before the year started there was alot of discussion on whether the Bills should go after Michael Vick. Most folks were against it not only for moral reasons of what Vick did, but because we weren't sure whether or not he'd ever return to his more productive self. As it has turned out, he is even better than he was in Atlanta. Given that, in looking at what both Vick and Fitzgerald bring to the table I am not convinced that Vick could have performed in Buffalo as well as Fitzy has this year. Although Vick has great escapability, it's his pocket performance and his ability to remain there that is making him great in Philly. For most of the year the Bills really have not had any pocket performance because if the ball isn't out very quickly it's not coming out. Fitzy's strength is his making quick decisions and getting the ball out. Holding the ball in the pocket is not an option in Buffalo. I'm not sure Vick would have done better than Fitzy on the Bills this year. That said, as the team improves Vick would have certainly been a better long term QB solution, but right now I'm happy with Fitz. Â Your crazy! What make me right is you don't even know his got damn name! FITZPATRICK.... LMAO! But you say he's better for the bills than MV7...You deserve a sticker for best thread of 2010!
PromoTheRobot Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 Does anyone know our QBs name? Fitzgerald is a WR for the Cardinals. Fitzgibbons is the QB for Buffalo. No it's Ryan Fitzpatrick...or is it Patrick Fitzryan? Â PTR
muffmonster Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 No it's Ryan Fitzpatrick...or is it Patrick Fitzryan? Â PTR Â Honestly between this and the Fitzgibbons thread my co-workers must think I'm going insane with all the giggling going on.
Grimace Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 I can't decide if I should laugh or bang my head on my desk. The combination of the two is making my co-workers look at me funny.
Van_phelaN1 Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 I thought his name was Ryan Fitzminstersonchesterton...
Repulsif Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 but right now I'm happy with Fitz So what is your post point then ?
Recommended Posts