/dev/null Posted December 10, 2004 Share Posted December 10, 2004 http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=...itics&printer=1 We bought it, we own it, we're going to take it back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey Posted December 10, 2004 Share Posted December 10, 2004 http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=...itics&printer=1 154760[/snapback] Well, they did raise lots of cash, you have to give them that. They sure are not short of pluck even if they are not overwhelmed with "intellectual horse power" (a phrase that Jen b*tch uses all the time on the Apprentice, I wanted to take it for a test spin). Seriously, Thomas Frank who wrote that "What's the matter with Kansas" book would probably applaud this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuntheDamnBall Posted December 10, 2004 Share Posted December 10, 2004 Well, they did raise lots of cash, you have to give them that. They sure are not short of pluck even if they are not overwhelmed with "intellectual horse power" (a phrase that Jen b*tch uses all the time on the Apprentice, I wanted to take it for a test spin). Seriously, Thomas Frank who wrote that "What's the matter with Kansas" book would probably applaud this. 154799[/snapback] And can one necessarily fault MoveOn for pointing out that the current leadership will not change a losing strategy? McAuliffe=Gilbride Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey Posted December 10, 2004 Share Posted December 10, 2004 And can one necessarily fault MoveOn for pointing out that the current leadership will not change a losing strategy? McAuliffe=Gilbride 154937[/snapback] Yeah, but maybe it is trading one losing strategy for another even more "losinger" than the last one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted December 10, 2004 Share Posted December 10, 2004 http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=...itics&printer=1 154760[/snapback] Considering the verbal sparring the DEMs have had on the editorial pages of WSJ over the past month, it doesn't surprise me. Until the DEMs finish the civil war among themselves, there's no point to consider them to be a viable party in the next election. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted December 10, 2004 Share Posted December 10, 2004 Moveon is on to something. Somebody set up us the bomb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted December 10, 2004 Author Share Posted December 10, 2004 Moveon is on to something. Somebody set up us the bomb. 155549[/snapback] what you say! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_BiB_ Posted December 10, 2004 Share Posted December 10, 2004 Hillary is going to get the Dem nomination in a cakewalk. The Clinton faction holds all the money, and no one can raise it like them. They're going to pull some rabbits out on the internet both learning from and also to offset Screamer Boy. As much as Kerry is ALREADY campaigning for 2008, it's not going to happen for him. That will be the result of the whole show. The only viable way the Republicans will have a chance against Hillary is to start promoting Condi Rice (except she probably doesn't want it) about 1 Feb 2006. That would go a long way to deflating the novelties. Also, in 2008 foreign policy will be an even bigger factor than it was in 2004. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted December 10, 2004 Author Share Posted December 10, 2004 The only viable way the Republicans will have a chance against Hillary155566[/snapback] Hillary Clinton winning the Democratic nomination is a gift wrapped Republican victory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_BiB_ Posted December 10, 2004 Share Posted December 10, 2004 Hillary Clinton winning the Democratic nomination is a gift wrapped Republican victory 155572[/snapback] Think it through. The world and by extension our country is going to be a s.hittier place four years from now. TV will blame it all on the Bush administration. 97.376 percent of the population will believe whatever TV tells them. If Kerry weren't the Democratic equivalent of the '96 Bob Dole, he'd be getting sworn in January 20th. One thing I do have hope for (wishfull thinking, albeit), is that 2008 might produce a semi-viable third party candidate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted December 10, 2004 Author Share Posted December 10, 2004 Think it through. The world and by extension our country is going to be a s.hittier place four years from now. I disagree with you on that, the world IMO will be a little better. not that it has anything to do with bush or would have anything to do with kerry were he elected 97.376 percent of the population will believe whatever TV tells them.you give your fellow americans too much credit. i put that figure over 99% If Kerry weren't the Democratic equivalent of the '96 Bob Dole, he'd be getting sworn in January 20th.maybe bob can council john on how to cope with the loss, and maybe hook him up with some viagra. i know i'd suffer ED were i married to kerry's wife One thing I do have hope for (wishfull thinking, albeit), is that 2008 might produce a semi-viable third party candidate. i've been hoping that since the day i registered to vote. still waiting for progress Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweet baboo Posted December 10, 2004 Share Posted December 10, 2004 maybe bob can council john on how to cope with the loss, and maybe hook him up with some viagra. i know i'd suffer ED were i married to kerry's wife 155600[/snapback] i feel like vomiting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts