Booster4324 Posted November 30, 2010 Posted November 30, 2010 (edited) Link Quote Joe Scarborough tells GOP to man up and confront Sarah Palin You’ve got to admit hers is a breathtaking high-wire act. What man or mouse with a fully functioning human brain and a résumé as thin as Palin’s would flirt with a presidential run? It makes the political biography of Barack Obama look more like Winston Churchill’s, despite the fact that the 44th president breezed into the Oval Office as little more than a glorified state senator. Edited November 30, 2010 by Booster4324
IDBillzFan Posted November 30, 2010 Posted November 30, 2010 On 11/30/2010 at 8:52 PM, Booster4324 said: Link I'd put more stock in that if Scarborough were actually a Republican.
ieatcrayonz Posted December 1, 2010 Posted December 1, 2010 On 11/30/2010 at 8:25 PM, LABillzFan said: Barack Obama: The Trent Edwards of presidents. Glove wearing Barry?
Rob's House Posted December 1, 2010 Posted December 1, 2010 (edited) Quote Joe Scarborough tells GOP to man up and confront Sarah Palin Youve got to admit hers is a breathtaking high-wire act. What man or mouse with a fully functioning human brain and a résumé as thin as Palins would flirt with a presidential run? It makes the political biography of Barack Obama look more like Winston Churchills, despite the fact that the 44th president breezed into the Oval Office as little more than a glorified state senator. Sometimes I see Joe doing an interview for a lib and think he's a pretty down to earth guy. Then I glance at his show and realize that he's a huge vagina in a suit. Despite his qualification, the bold statement is no less retarded for it. If anything the exact opposite could be said. Obama's rise from community organizer , to state Senator (where he voted "present" on just about everthing short of housing legislation to line the pockets of his cronies who just coincidentally hooked him up with sweetheart real estate deals), to U.S. senator (where he served for all of about 10 minutes before abandoning that responsibility to become a full time Presidential candidate, as could only be done in the MTV era) is somehow more substantial than being the Governor of a state? Even if it is Alaska? Really, Joe? This is Joe doing his best O'Reilly impression trying to appease libs by showing that he doesn't let logic prevent him from selling himself as an independent. Edited December 1, 2010 by Rob's House
IDBillzFan Posted December 1, 2010 Posted December 1, 2010 On 12/1/2010 at 3:35 PM, Rob said: This is Joe doing his best O'Reilly impression trying to appease libs by showing that he doesn't let logic prevent him from selling himself as an independent. And as I was reading last night, it's probably not in Scarborough's best interest to criticize anyone for leaving an elected office early (he quit five months after his being elected to a fourth term) lest they start asking him about having dead interns show up in their office.
pBills Posted December 1, 2010 Posted December 1, 2010 On 12/1/2010 at 3:35 PM, Rob said: Sometimes I see Joe doing an interview for a lib and think he's a pretty down to earth guy. Then I glance at his show and realize that he's a huge vagina in a suit. Despite his qualification, the bold statement is no less retarded for it. If anything the exact opposite could be said. Obama's rise from community organizer , to state Senator (where he voted "present" on just about everthing short of housing legislation to line the pockets of his cronies who just coincidentally hooked him up with sweetheart real estate deals), to U.S. senator (where he served for all of about 10 minutes before abandoning that responsibility to become a full time Presidential candidate, as could only be done in the MTV era) is somehow more substantial than being the Governor of a state? Even if it is Alaska? Really, Joe? This is Joe doing his best O'Reilly impression trying to appease libs by showing that he doesn't let logic prevent him from selling himself as an independent. Why doesn't confront her? Why not?
Rob's House Posted December 1, 2010 Posted December 1, 2010 On 12/1/2010 at 4:11 PM, pBills said: Why doesn't confront her? Why not?
pBills Posted December 1, 2010 Posted December 1, 2010 On 12/1/2010 at 4:55 PM, Rob said: What are you unsure about?
LeviF Posted December 1, 2010 Posted December 1, 2010 On 12/1/2010 at 5:14 PM, pBills said: What are you unsure about? Not to speak for Rob, but I think it might be the question, "Why does not confront her?"
Magox Posted December 1, 2010 Posted December 1, 2010 On 12/1/2010 at 5:16 PM, LeviF91 said: Not to speak for Rob, but I think it might be the question, "Why does not confront her?" Not only that, but in what context? Who's confronting who?
IDBillzFan Posted December 1, 2010 Posted December 1, 2010 On 12/1/2010 at 5:25 PM, Magox said: Not only that, but in what context? Who's confronting who? And where is this confronting taking place, if why does confront her?
Magox Posted December 1, 2010 Posted December 1, 2010 On 12/1/2010 at 5:35 PM, LABillzFan said: And where is this confronting taking place, if why does confront her? why's on first? Well then where the hell is who??
Recommended Posts